The gender dimensions of mental health during the Covid-19 pandemic: A path analysis.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2023
2023
Historique:
received:
09
08
2022
accepted:
28
02
2023
medline:
22
5
2023
pubmed:
19
5
2023
entrez:
19
5
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The Covid-19 pandemic has had a substantial population mental health impact, with evidence indicating that mental health has deteriorated in particular for women. This gender difference could be explained by the distinct experiences of women during the pandemic, including the burden of unpaid domestic labour, changes in economic activity, and experiences of loneliness. This study investigates potential mediators in the relationship between gender and mental health during the first wave of the Covid-19 pandemic in the UK. We used data from 9,351 participants of Understanding Society, a longitudinal household survey from the UK. We conducted a mediation analysis using structural equation modelling to estimate the role of four mediators, measured during the first lockdown in April 2020, in the relationship between gender and mental health in May and July 2020. Mental health was measured with the 12-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12). Standardized coefficients for each path were obtained, as well as indirect effects for the role of employment disruption, hours spent on housework, hours spent on childcare, and loneliness. In a model controlling for age, household income and pre-pandemic mental health, we found that gender was associated with all four mediators, but only loneliness was associated with mental health at both time points. The indirect effects showed strong evidence of partial mediation through loneliness for the relationship between gender and mental health problems; loneliness accounted for 83.9% of the total effect in May, and 76.1% in July. No evidence of mediation was found for housework, childcare, or employment disruption. The results suggest that the worse mental health found among women during the initial period of the Covid-19 pandemic is partly explained by women reporting more experiences of loneliness. Understanding this mechanism is important for prioritising interventions to address gender-based inequities that have been exacerbated by the pandemic.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
The Covid-19 pandemic has had a substantial population mental health impact, with evidence indicating that mental health has deteriorated in particular for women. This gender difference could be explained by the distinct experiences of women during the pandemic, including the burden of unpaid domestic labour, changes in economic activity, and experiences of loneliness. This study investigates potential mediators in the relationship between gender and mental health during the first wave of the Covid-19 pandemic in the UK.
METHODS
We used data from 9,351 participants of Understanding Society, a longitudinal household survey from the UK. We conducted a mediation analysis using structural equation modelling to estimate the role of four mediators, measured during the first lockdown in April 2020, in the relationship between gender and mental health in May and July 2020. Mental health was measured with the 12-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12). Standardized coefficients for each path were obtained, as well as indirect effects for the role of employment disruption, hours spent on housework, hours spent on childcare, and loneliness.
RESULTS
In a model controlling for age, household income and pre-pandemic mental health, we found that gender was associated with all four mediators, but only loneliness was associated with mental health at both time points. The indirect effects showed strong evidence of partial mediation through loneliness for the relationship between gender and mental health problems; loneliness accounted for 83.9% of the total effect in May, and 76.1% in July. No evidence of mediation was found for housework, childcare, or employment disruption.
CONCLUSION
The results suggest that the worse mental health found among women during the initial period of the Covid-19 pandemic is partly explained by women reporting more experiences of loneliness. Understanding this mechanism is important for prioritising interventions to address gender-based inequities that have been exacerbated by the pandemic.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37205670
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0283514
pii: PONE-D-22-22332
pmc: PMC10198511
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0283514Subventions
Organisme : Department of Health
Pays : United Kingdom
Informations de copyright
Copyright: © 2023 Dotsikas et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
J Psychol. 2012 Jan-Apr;146(1-2):85-104
pubmed: 22303614
Br J Psychiatry. 2021 Jun;218(6):334-343
pubmed: 33228822
Psychiatry Res. 2021 Sep;303:114074
pubmed: 34271372
Soc Indic Res. 2018;137(3):1145-1162
pubmed: 29962655
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2022 Nov;57(11):2161-2178
pubmed: 35583561
Lancet Psychiatry. 2021 Jan;8(1):48-57
pubmed: 33181096
BJPsych Open. 2022 Jun 01;8(4):e103
pubmed: 35642377
Psychiatry Res. 2020 Sep;291:113267
pubmed: 32623266
Soc Sci Med. 2020 Nov;265:113521
pubmed: 33257177
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2020 Jul;55(7):793-810
pubmed: 32524169
PLoS One. 2021 Mar 4;16(3):e0247959
pubmed: 33662014
Soc Sci Med. 2022 Sep;308:115226
pubmed: 35932537
Epidemiol Health. 2020;42:e2020038
pubmed: 32512661
Lancet. 2020 Mar 14;395(10227):912-920
pubmed: 32112714
J Psychiatr Res. 2021 Apr;136:103-108
pubmed: 33582608
Lancet Psychiatry. 2020 Oct;7(10):883-892
pubmed: 32707037
Psychiatry Res. 2021 Feb;296:113648
pubmed: 33348199
BMC Psychiatry. 2017 Mar 20;17(1):97
pubmed: 28320380
Ann Behav Med. 2010 Oct;40(2):218-27
pubmed: 20652462
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2020 Oct;55(10):1297-1310
pubmed: 31538206
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2021 Mar;75(3):224-231
pubmed: 32978210
Psychol Med. 2022 Oct;52(13):2549-2558
pubmed: 33183370
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2020 Feb;55(2):251-257
pubmed: 31115597
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2021 Dec;55(12):1144-1156
pubmed: 34256632
Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2018 Aug;64(5):427-435
pubmed: 29792097
Psychol Med. 2022 Oct;52(14):2997-3006
pubmed: 33280639
Lancet Psychiatry. 2021 Feb;8(2):141-149
pubmed: 33308420
Psychol Aging. 2010 Jun;25(2):453-63
pubmed: 20545429
Clin Pract Epidemiol Ment Health. 2010 Jun 18;6:36-46
pubmed: 20802807
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2016 May;89(4):561-73
pubmed: 26715495
J Affect Disord. 2022 Jan 1;296:567-576
pubmed: 34600966
PLoS One. 2021 Jan 6;16(1):e0244419
pubmed: 33406085
Sci Rep. 2021 Aug 5;11(1):15958
pubmed: 34354201
Biol Sex Differ. 2022 May 12;13(1):23
pubmed: 35550193
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2011 Apr;79(2):225-35
pubmed: 21443322
J Behav Exp Econ. 2022 Dec;101:101952
pubmed: 36339351