Inflorescences of Cuscuta (Convolvulaceae): Diversity, evolution and relationships with breeding systems and fruit dehiscence modes.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2023
2023
Historique:
received:
06
12
2022
accepted:
09
05
2023
medline:
22
5
2023
pubmed:
19
5
2023
entrez:
19
5
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Cuscuta (dodder) includes ca. 200 species of plant obligate stem parasites with enormous ecological and economical significance. Inflorescences have been historically used in Cuscuta for species descriptions and identification keys, but no comprehensive study exists to date. The main objectives of this study were to survey the diversity and evolution of inflorescences and to uncover their possible form-function relationships. The inflorescence architecture of 132 Cuscuta taxa was analysed using herbarium specimens and eight species were grown to study their inflorescence development. Inflorescence traits were mapped into a genus phylogeny obtained from a combined analysis of nuclear ITS and plastid trnL-F sequences. To test the hypothesis that inflorescence architecture is connected to sexual reproduction, correlations between inflorescence traits (using Principal Components), sexual reproductive traits (pollen/ovule ratios, corolla length and diameter), fruit charaters (fruit length and width), and the modes of dehiscence were analyzed. Based on their development, three major types of inflorescences were observed: "Cuscuta type", a simple, monochasial scorpioid cyme; "Monogynella type", a compound monochasial scorpioid cymes with the longest primary axes having prolonged vegetative growth and giving the appearance of thyrses; and "Grammica type", a compound monochasial scorpiod cymes with up to five orders of axes. Maximum likelihood analyses suggested Monogynella as the ancestral type, while Cuscuta and Grammica were derived. Overall, the total length of axes exhibited a reduction trend throughout the genus evolution, but it was not correlated with the pedicels length. Inflorescences with similar architectures may exhibit contrasting pollen-ovule ratios. Positive significant correlations were noted between the size of the flower traits and pollen-ovule ratios. Several modes of dehiscence had statistically significant different total axes lengths, suggesting that the infructescence architecture is connected to the modes of dehiscence in Cuscuta and therefore seed dispersal.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37205688
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0286100
pii: PONE-D-22-33494
pmc: PMC10198556
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0286100Informations de copyright
Copyright: © 2023 Glofcheskie et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Am J Bot. 2002 Jan;89(1):37-49
pubmed: 21669710
Front Plant Sci. 2015 Feb 04;6:45
pubmed: 25699071
Am J Bot. 2014 Apr;101(4):670-90
pubmed: 24688058
Am J Bot. 2022 May;109(5):746-767
pubmed: 35619567
Ann Bot. 2013 Nov;112(8):1477-93
pubmed: 23243190
Evolution. 2006 Feb;60(2):234-46
pubmed: 16610316
Trends Plant Sci. 2009 Jun;14(6):302-9
pubmed: 19423382
New Phytol. 2005 Jun;166(3):737-51
pubmed: 15869638
Am J Bot. 2006 Jul;93(7):1010-8
pubmed: 21642166
Ann Bot. 2013 Nov;112(8):1523-42
pubmed: 23445936
PLoS One. 2020 Jun 12;15(6):e0234627
pubmed: 32530960
Trends Ecol Evol. 2012 Jun;27(6):353-61
pubmed: 22445687
Sci Rep. 2021 Nov 2;11(1):21494
pubmed: 34728750
Oecologia. 1998 Mar;114(1):100-105
pubmed: 28307547
Org Divers Evol. 2018;18(4):383-398
pubmed: 30930685
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Sep 15;117(37):23125-23130
pubmed: 32868415
Mycorrhiza. 2015 Oct;25(7):573-85
pubmed: 25720736
Evolution. 1977 Mar;31(1):32-46
pubmed: 28567723
Syst Biol. 2004 Jun;53(3):384-99
pubmed: 15503669
Ann Bot. 2013 Nov;112(8):1471-6
pubmed: 24383103
J Exp Bot. 2010 May;61(9):2235-46
pubmed: 20308206
Am J Bot. 2007 Apr;94(4):568-89
pubmed: 21636427
Am Nat. 2006 Apr;167(4):496-509
pubmed: 16670993
Am J Bot. 2009 Sep;96(9):1744-50
pubmed: 21622360