A Study of Round Window and its Adjacent Anatomy to Guide the Cochlear Implant Electrode Insertion.
Cochlear implantation
Crista fenestra
Residual hearing
Round window
Journal
Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India
ISSN: 2231-3796
Titre abrégé: Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg
Pays: India
ID NLM: 9422551
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Apr 2023
Apr 2023
Historique:
received:
27
09
2022
accepted:
18
11
2022
pmc-release:
01
04
2024
medline:
19
5
2023
pubmed:
19
5
2023
entrez:
19
5
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Residual hearing preservation has gained attention now which has brought round window membrane into the light, as a port for cochlear implantation. Atraumatic insertion of electrodes can be achieved by study of anatomical variations of round window and its forms which can guide the surgeon. This study was undertaken to examine the anatomical variations of round window and its adjacent structures and their impact on surgical approach during cochlear implantation. A series of 40 adult human temporal bones underwent high-resolution CT scanning and were further dissected for microscopic study of the round window. The antero posterior dimensions of RW ranged from 1.22 to 2.51 mm on radiology and on dissection 1.76 mm +/- 0.3 mm. Shape of round window in 72.5% of bones was oval, and in 27.5% bones it was round shaped. As per Saint Thomas hospital classification for Round window visualization we found 82.5% bones had type I RW visualization and 17.5% had type IIa RW visualization. Area of crista fenestra on dissection was ranging from 0.41 to 0.69 mm Residual hearing preservation has become a new motto for surgeons. Therefore thorough anatomic knowledge of round window is must for careful insertion, as round window is closely related to the sensitive inner ear structures.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37206735
doi: 10.1007/s12070-022-03288-7
pii: 3288
pmc: PMC10188745
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
163-169Informations de copyright
© Association of Otolaryngologists of India 2022, Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Conflict of InterestNone.
Références
Clin Anat. 2014 Apr;27(3):331-6
pubmed: 24357095
Ann Anat. 2006 Mar;188(2):93-101
pubmed: 16551006
Audiol Neurootol. 2017;22(1):50-55
pubmed: 28641288
Laryngoscope. 1982 May;92(5):483-6
pubmed: 7078322
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2013 Mar;270(4):1237-42
pubmed: 22806055
Clin Otolaryngol. 2018 Apr;43(2):417-424
pubmed: 29240305
Folia Morphol (Warsz). 2004 Aug;63(3):309-12
pubmed: 15478106
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2019 Jul - Aug;85(4):435-446
pubmed: 29759935
Laryngoscope. 2007 Aug;117(8):1397-402
pubmed: 17585282
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1989 May;98(5 Pt 1):336-8
pubmed: 2719450
Otol Neurotol. 2012 Sep;33(7):1181-7
pubmed: 22892806
Otol Neurotol. 2014 Sep;35(8):1354-60
pubmed: 24608377
Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2012 May;26(10):445-8
pubmed: 22870716
Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2020 Jul;24(3):e288-e298
pubmed: 32754239
J Laryngol Otol. 1987 Feb;101(2):97-102
pubmed: 3572226