Reasons for modern contraceptives choice and long-acting reversible contraceptives early removal in Amhara Region, Northwest Ethiopia; qualitative approach.
Choice
Early removal
Ethiopia
Modern contraceptives
Qualitative
Journal
BMC women's health
ISSN: 1472-6874
Titre abrégé: BMC Womens Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101088690
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
19 05 2023
19 05 2023
Historique:
received:
24
01
2023
accepted:
18
04
2023
medline:
22
5
2023
pubmed:
20
5
2023
entrez:
19
5
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Women use modern contraceptive methods, mainly either to limit or space pregnancy and both are not identical in their choices. One method may not best fit an individual's need irrespective of the time of spacing. Cognizant of this, the context with which women base in choice of contraceptives, their lived experiences in using, and factors for early removal/ discontinuation of long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARCs) are not much investigated in the study setting and our study aimed to bridge the gap through exploring the underlying reasons. A phenomenological study design was used to explore sampled women's reasons and experiences. Reproductive-aged women (15-49 years) who removed long-acting methods in the past 6 months were included. A criterion sampling approach was employed to recruit study participants. Data was collected using an interview guide for in-depth (IDIs) and key informant interviews and were tape-recorded with interviewees' consent. Audio data were transcribed verbatim and translated into English. The data was first saved in plain text format and imported into Atlas.ti 7.0 software to facilitate coding and categorizing. The content analysis method was used to classify, organize data, and interpret the qualitative data according to key categories. Several misconceptions about contraceptives (e.g., implants are not appropriate for daily laborers, women who use contraceptives (such as injectables) can only bear girl-child, etc.) were reported by clients and health providers. These misconceptions might not have scientific merit but they are powerful enough to affect actual behaviors toward contraceptives, including early removal. The awareness, attitude, and use of contraceptives tend to be lower in rural areas. For premature removal of LARCs, side effects, and heavy menstrual bleeding, was the most commonly identified reason. The IUCD is the least preferred method and users said it is not comfortable during sex. Our study found different reasons and misconceptions for modern contraceptive methods' non-use and discontinuation. Standardized counseling approaches like the REDI (Rapport Building, Exploration, Decision Making, and Implementation) framework should be implemented in the country consistently. Some of the concrete providers' conceptions should be well-studied considering contextual factors to bring scientific evidence.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Women use modern contraceptive methods, mainly either to limit or space pregnancy and both are not identical in their choices. One method may not best fit an individual's need irrespective of the time of spacing. Cognizant of this, the context with which women base in choice of contraceptives, their lived experiences in using, and factors for early removal/ discontinuation of long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARCs) are not much investigated in the study setting and our study aimed to bridge the gap through exploring the underlying reasons.
METHOD
A phenomenological study design was used to explore sampled women's reasons and experiences. Reproductive-aged women (15-49 years) who removed long-acting methods in the past 6 months were included. A criterion sampling approach was employed to recruit study participants. Data was collected using an interview guide for in-depth (IDIs) and key informant interviews and were tape-recorded with interviewees' consent. Audio data were transcribed verbatim and translated into English. The data was first saved in plain text format and imported into Atlas.ti 7.0 software to facilitate coding and categorizing. The content analysis method was used to classify, organize data, and interpret the qualitative data according to key categories.
RESULTS
Several misconceptions about contraceptives (e.g., implants are not appropriate for daily laborers, women who use contraceptives (such as injectables) can only bear girl-child, etc.) were reported by clients and health providers. These misconceptions might not have scientific merit but they are powerful enough to affect actual behaviors toward contraceptives, including early removal. The awareness, attitude, and use of contraceptives tend to be lower in rural areas. For premature removal of LARCs, side effects, and heavy menstrual bleeding, was the most commonly identified reason. The IUCD is the least preferred method and users said it is not comfortable during sex.
CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION
Our study found different reasons and misconceptions for modern contraceptive methods' non-use and discontinuation. Standardized counseling approaches like the REDI (Rapport Building, Exploration, Decision Making, and Implementation) framework should be implemented in the country consistently. Some of the concrete providers' conceptions should be well-studied considering contextual factors to bring scientific evidence.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37208658
doi: 10.1186/s12905-023-02375-3
pii: 10.1186/s12905-023-02375-3
pmc: PMC10199468
doi:
Substances chimiques
Contraceptive Agents
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
273Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
BMC Public Health. 2017 Jun 29;17(1):604
pubmed: 28662695
Int J Public Health. 2015 Dec;60(8):987-97
pubmed: 25967466
PLoS One. 2017 Feb 13;12(2):e0171573
pubmed: 28192478
Contraception. 1994 Jan;49(1):56-72
pubmed: 8137626
BMC Womens Health. 2016 Jan 15;16:2
pubmed: 26772591
Open Access J Contracept. 2016 Mar 29;7:33-41
pubmed: 29386935
PLoS One. 2015 Oct 20;10(10):e0139628
pubmed: 26485524
Contraception. 2017 Oct;96(4):221-226
pubmed: 28756187
J Adolesc Health. 2009 Sep;45(3):262-7
pubmed: 19699422
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Jan;206(1):40.e1-7
pubmed: 21903193
Contraception. 2013 Jan;87(1):101-6
pubmed: 23083530
Glob Health Sci Pract. 2018 Oct 4;6(3):473-483
pubmed: 30213877
J Pak Med Assoc. 2012 Oct;62(10):1023-8
pubmed: 23866439
Reprod Health. 2017 Apr 27;14(1):56
pubmed: 28449723
Womens Health Issues. 2017 Sep - Oct;27(5):539-545
pubmed: 28412049
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2015 Sep;47(3):115-22
pubmed: 26280666
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016 Nov 16;16(1):355
pubmed: 27852239
BMC Womens Health. 2018 Jan 08;18(1):10
pubmed: 29310654
Int J Womens Health. 2021 Jul 02;13:645-652
pubmed: 34239332
Contraception. 2009 Dec;80(6):527-32
pubmed: 19913146
Arch Public Health. 2019 Mar 12;77:11
pubmed: 30911385
BMC Womens Health. 2013 Feb 28;13:9
pubmed: 23448283
BMC Womens Health. 2020 Jan 2;20(1):2
pubmed: 31896349
Int J Reprod Med. 2018 Jan 21;2018:3597487
pubmed: 29796392