Clinical significance of distal femur morphology in a healthy Mongolian youth population.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
20 05 2023
20 05 2023
Historique:
received:
07
03
2022
accepted:
18
05
2023
medline:
22
5
2023
pubmed:
21
5
2023
entrez:
20
5
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Morphological parameters of knee joint are related to race and nationality. At present, knee prosthesis come from white male population. Due to the mismatch between the prosthesis and other ethnic groups, the prosthesis life span is reduced, revision surgery and the patients' economic burden are increased. There is no data of the Mongolian ethnic group. In order to treat patients more accurately, we measured the Mongolian data of the femoral condyle. A total of 122 knee joints were scanned in 61 volunteers (21 males and 40 females) with an average age of 23.259 ± 1.395 years. The Mimics software was used to reconstruct the 3D image and measure the data of each line. The data were analyzed by statistical methods such as t test, and P < 0.05 was taken as the significant. 122 normal femoral condyle data were obtained. The mean transverse diameter of femoral condyle is 76.472 ± 5.952 mm, medial condyle is 29.259 ± 11.461 mm, and the sagittal diameter of the medial condyle was 56.758 ± 4.163 mm. The transverse diameter of the lateral femoral condyle is 29.388 ± 3.157 mm, the sagittal diameter of the lateral condyle is 58.937 ± 3.527 mm and the femoral plane rate is 1.264 ± 0.072. (1) There was no statistical significance in the left and right knee joint data (P > 0.05). (2) The different genders data of femoral condyle were statistically significant (P < 0.05). (3) Compared with other nationalities and races, the data of femoral condyle are different. (4) There are differences between femoral surface ratio and mainstream prosthesis data.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37210457
doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-35463-3
pii: 10.1038/s41598-023-35463-3
pmc: PMC10199924
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
8187Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
Knee Surg Relat Res. 2015 Mar;27(1):17-23
pubmed: 25750890
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019 Jul;27(7):2130-2139
pubmed: 30770956
Knee. 2016 Aug;23(4):719-24
pubmed: 26853740
Knee. 2013 Jan;20(1):26-30
pubmed: 22721912
Int Orthop. 2014 Feb;38(2):273-83
pubmed: 24366186
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016 Aug;24(8):2532-40
pubmed: 25605560
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Jul;472(7):2197-200
pubmed: 24615421
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013 Oct;21(10):2314-24
pubmed: 23404515
Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2010 Jun;39(6 Suppl):9-12
pubmed: 20631933
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Jan;475(1):170-182
pubmed: 27704318
Int Orthop. 2018 Oct;42(10):2349-2356
pubmed: 29464370
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005 Sep;87 Suppl 1(Pt 2):271-84
pubmed: 16140800
Forensic Sci Int. 2016 Feb;259:246.e1-5
pubmed: 26743712
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017 Jun;25(6):1720-1730
pubmed: 27671286
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019 May;27(5):1544-1551
pubmed: 29860600
Bone Joint J. 2014 Nov;96-B(11 Supple A):101-4
pubmed: 25381419
J Arthroplasty. 2011 Jan;26(1):124-30
pubmed: 20149574
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2009 Dec;17(12):766-74
pubmed: 19948701
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85-A Suppl 4:115-22
pubmed: 14652402
Knee. 2014 Dec;21(6):1221-4
pubmed: 25450008
J Arthroplasty. 2010 Jan;25(1):58-63
pubmed: 19097851
J Arthroplasty. 2017 Dec;32(12):3854-3860
pubmed: 28844632
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 Jan;470(1):172-85
pubmed: 21948324
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010 May;92(5):1115-21
pubmed: 20439656