Evaluating compliance and applicability of postpartum pessary use for preventing and treating pelvic floor dysfunction: a prospective multicenter study.
Compliance
Pelvic floor dysfunction
Pessary therapy
Postpartum
Prevention
Journal
Archives of gynecology and obstetrics
ISSN: 1432-0711
Titre abrégé: Arch Gynecol Obstet
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 8710213
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 2023
08 2023
Historique:
received:
13
03
2023
accepted:
04
05
2023
medline:
28
6
2023
pubmed:
21
5
2023
entrez:
21
5
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Pelvic floor disorders are common and associated with pregnancy and childbirth. For restitution of pelvic floor connective tissue and thereby therapy of postpartum pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence, the Restifem Restifem After 8 weeks, 209 women answered the questionnaire. 119 women used the pessary. Common problems were discomfort, pain and the pessary use was to circuitous. Vaginal infections were rare. After 3 months, 85 women and after 6 months, 38 women still used the pessary. 3 months postpartum, 94% of women with POP, 72% of women with UI and 66% of women with OAB stated to have an improvement of their symptoms using the pessary. 88% women without any disorder felt an improvement of stability. Use of the Restifem
Identifiants
pubmed: 37210701
doi: 10.1007/s00404-023-07075-9
pii: 10.1007/s00404-023-07075-9
pmc: PMC10293351
doi:
Types de publication
Multicenter Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
651-659Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
Handa VL, Blomquist JL, Knoepp LR, Hoskey KA, McDermott KC, Muñoz A (2011) Pelvic floor disorders 5–10 years after vaginal or cesarean childbirth. Obstet Gynecol 118(4):777–784. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182267f2f . (PMID: 21897313; PMCID: PMC3178744)
doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182267f2f
pubmed: 21897313
pmcid: 3178744
Blomquist JL, Muñoz A, Carroll M, Handa VL (2018) Association of delivery mode with pelvic floor disorders after childbirth. JAMA 320(23):2438–2447. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2018.18315 . (PMID: 30561480; PMCID: PMC6583632)
doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.18315
pubmed: 30561480
pmcid: 6583632
Allen RE, Hosker GL, Smith AR, Warrell DW (1990) Pelvic floor damage and childbirth: a neurophysiological study. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 97(9):770–779. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.1990.tb02570.x . (PMID: 2242361)
doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1990.tb02570.x
pubmed: 2242361
Kruger JA, Budgett SC, Wong V, Nielsen PMF, Nash MP, Smalldridge J, Hayward LM, Tian TY, Taberner AJ (2017) Characterizing levator-ani muscle stiffness pre- and post-childbirth in European and Polynesian women in New Zealand: a pilot study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 96(10):1234–1242. https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.13186 . (Epub 2017 Jul 28 PMID: 28664535)
doi: 10.1111/aogs.13186
pubmed: 28664535
Dietz HP (2021) Ultrasound imaging of maternal birth trauma. Int Urogynecol J 32(7):1953–1962. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-020-04669-8 . (Epub 2021 Feb 17 PMID: 33595672)
doi: 10.1007/s00192-020-04669-8
pubmed: 33595672
Van de Waarsenburg MK, Verberne EA, van der Vaart CH, Withagen MIJ (2018) Recovery of puborectalis muscle after vaginal delivery: an ultrasound study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 52(3):390–395. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.18976 . (PMID: 29205594)
doi: 10.1002/uog.18976
pubmed: 29205594
van Veelen GA, Schweitzer KJ, van der Vaart CH (2014) Ultrasound imaging of the pelvic floor: changes in anatomy during and after first pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 44(4):476–480. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.13301 . (PMID: 24436146)
doi: 10.1002/uog.13301
pubmed: 24436146
Woodley SJ, Lawrenson P, Boyle R, Cody JD, Mørkved S, Kernohan A, Hay-Smith EJC (2020) Pelvic floor muscle training for preventing and treating urinary and faecal incontinence in antenatal and postnatal women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 5(5):CD007471. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD007471.pub4 . (PMID: 32378735; PMCID: PMC7203602)
doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007471.pub4
pubmed: 32378735
Bø K, Anglès-Acedo S, Batra A, Brækken IH, Chan YL, Jorge CH, Kruger J, Yadav M, Dumoulin C (2022) International urogynecology consultation chapter 3 committee 2; conservative treatment of patient with pelvic organ prolapse: pelvic floor muscle training. Int Urogynecol J 33(10):2633–2667. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-022-05324-0 . (Epub 2022 Aug 18. PMID: 35980443; PMCID: PMC9477909)
doi: 10.1007/s00192-022-05324-0
pubmed: 35980443
pmcid: 9477909
Schütze S, Heinloth M, Uhde M, Schütze J, Hüner B, Janni W, Deniz M (2022) The effect of pelvic floor muscle training on pelvic floor function and sexuality postpartum. A randomized study including 300 primiparous. Arch Gynecol Obstet 306(3):785–793. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-022-06542-z . (Epub 2022 Apr 4. PMID: 35377043; PMCID: PMC8977567)
doi: 10.1007/s00404-022-06542-z
pubmed: 35377043
pmcid: 8977567
Alouini S, Memic S, Couillandre A (2022) Pelvic floor muscle training for urinary incontinence with or without biofeedback or electrostimulation in women: a systematic review. Int J Environ Res Public Health 19(5):2789. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19052789 . (PMID: 35270480; PMCID: PMC8910078)
doi: 10.3390/ijerph19052789
pubmed: 35270480
pmcid: 8910078
Bodner-Adler B, Bodner K, Stinglmeier A, Kimberger O, Halpern K, Koelbl H, Umek W (2019) Prolapse surgery versus vaginal pessary in women with symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse: which factors influence the choice of treatment? Arch Gynecol Obstet 299(3):773–777. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-019-05046-7 . (Epub 2019 Jan 17. PMID: 30656443; PMCID: PMC6394765)
doi: 10.1007/s00404-019-05046-7
pubmed: 30656443
pmcid: 6394765
Al-Shaikh G, Syed S, Osman S, Bogis A, Al-Badr A (2018) Pessary use in stress urinary incontinence: a review of advantages, complications, patient satisfaction, and quality of life. Int J Womens Health 17(10):195–201. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJWH.S152616 . (PMID: 29713205; PMCID: PMC5909791)
doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S152616
Karlsson J, Eriksson BI, Swärd L (1996) Early functional treatment for acute ligament injuries of the ankle joint. Scand J Med Sci Sports 6(6):341–345. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0838.1996.tb00104.x . (PMID: 9046544)
doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0838.1996.tb00104.x
pubmed: 9046544
Baessler K, Heihoff-Klose A, Boelke S, Stupin J, Junginger B (2019) Does an early postpartum pessary treatment lead to remission of pelvic organ prolapse after vaginal birth? A pilot study. Int Urogynecol J 30(1):S349–S350. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-019-04116-3
doi: 10.1007/s00192-019-04116-3
Lange R, Tabibi E, Hitschold T, Lange S, Naumann G (2021) Beckenboden-REhabilitations-STudie BREST. Kongress der Deutschen Kontinenz Gesellschaft sine loco [digital], 05.-06.-11.2021. German Medical Science GMS Publishing House, Düsseldorf, p Doc65. https://doi.org/10.3205/21dkg65
doi: 10.3205/21dkg65
DeLancey JO (1992) Anatomic aspects of vaginal eversion after hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 166(6 Pt 1):1717–1724. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9378(92)91562-o . (Discussion 1724-8, PMID: 1615980)
doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(92)91562-o
pubmed: 1615980
Huebner M, DeLancey JOL (2019) Levels of pelvic floor support: what do they look like on magnetic resonance imaging? Int Urogynecol J 30(9):1593–1595. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-019-03986-x . (Epub 2019 May 29. PMID: 31143979; PMCID: PMC6707880)
doi: 10.1007/s00192-019-03986-x
pubmed: 31143979
pmcid: 6707880
Beilecke K (2019) Postpartale Beeinflussung des Beckenbodenbindegewebes—ein bisher vernachlässigter Therapieansatz. Frauenarzt Nr. 8:505–507
Baessler K, Junginger B (2011) Beckenboden-Fragebogen für Frauen. Validierung eines Instrumentes mit posttherapeutischem Modul zur Evaluation von Symptomen, Leidensdruck, Lebensqualität, Verbesserung und Zufriedenheit. Aktuelle Urol 42:316–322
pubmed: 21898280
Bihler J, Tunn R, Reisenauer C, Kolenic GE, Pauluschke-Froehlich J, Wagner P, Abele H, Rall KK, Naumann G, Wallwiener S, Wallwiener M, Sohn C, Brucker SY, Huebner M (2019) The preferred mode of delivery of medical professionals and non-medical professional mothers-to-be and the impact of additional information on their decision: an online questionnaire cohort study. Arch Gynecol Obstet 299(2):371–384. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-018-4970-7 . (Epub 2018 Nov 22 PMID: 30467635)
doi: 10.1007/s00404-018-4970-7
pubmed: 30467635
Meyer VM, Benjamens S, Moumni ME, Lange JFM, Pol RA (2022) Global overview of response rates in patient and health care professional surveys in surgery: a systematic review. Ann Surg 275(1):e75–e81. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000004078 . (PMID: 32649458; PMCID: PMC8683255)
doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004078
pubmed: 32649458
Hsieh MF, Tsai HW, Liou WS, Lo CC, Lin ZH, An YF, Lin HY (2019) Long-term compliance of vaginal pessaries: does stress urinary incontinence matter? Medicine (Baltimore) 98(14):e15063. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000015063 . (PMID: 30946355; PMCID: PMC6455947)
doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000015063
pubmed: 30946355
Manchana T (2011) Ring pessary for all pelvic organ prolapse. Arch Gynecol Obstet 284(2):391–395. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-010-1675-y . (Epub 2010 Sep 17 PMID: 20848116)
doi: 10.1007/s00404-010-1675-y
pubmed: 20848116
Manzini C, Morsinkhof LM, van der Vaart CH, Withagen MIJ, Grob ATM (2022) Parameters associated with unsuccessful pessary fitting for pelvic organ prolapse up to three months follow-up: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Urogynecol J 33(7):1719–1763. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-021-05015-2 . (Epub 2022 Jan 17. PMID: 35037973; PMCID: PMC9270314)
doi: 10.1007/s00192-021-05015-2
pubmed: 35037973
pmcid: 9270314