The role of principled engagement in public health policymaking: the case of Zambia's prolonged efforts to develop a comprehensive tobacco control policy.
Collaborative governance
Zambia
policy process
principled engagement
tobacco control
Journal
Global health action
ISSN: 1654-9880
Titre abrégé: Glob Health Action
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101496665
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
31 12 2023
31 12 2023
Historique:
medline:
23
5
2023
pubmed:
22
5
2023
entrez:
22
5
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC) requires countries to develop and implement multi-sectoral tobacco control strategies, including policies and legislation. Zambia, potentially faced by a rising problem of tobacco smoking, signed the FCTC in 2008 but has been unable to enact a tobacco policy for over a decade. This study explores the role of 'principled engagement', a key element of the theoretical framework for collaborative governance, in Zambia's delayed success to develop a comprehensive tobacco control policy. This was a qualitative case study of key stakeholders in the collaborative process of trying to develop a tobacco policy in Zambia. Participan-ts were sampled from across various sectors, including government departments and civil society, comprising anti-tobacco activists and researchers. A total of 27 key informant interviews were undertaken. We supplemented the interview data with a document review of relevant policies and legislation. Data were analysed using thematic analysis. Several factors hindered efforts to attain principled engagement, including the adverse legal and socioeconomic environment in which the collaborative regime evolves; poor planning of meetings and frequent changes in tobacco focal point persons; lack of active and meaningful participation; and communication challenges among the key stakeholders. These collaborative dynamics, coupled with the opposition to tobacco control efforts from within some government departments, revealed the inadequacy of the current collaborative governance regime to facilitate enactment of a comprehensive tobacco control policy in Zambia. Efforts to develop a comprehensive tobacco control policy in Zambia will require addressing challenges such as disagreements, communication, and leadership at engagement level across interested sectors. We further argue that principled engagement has a greater role to play in unlocking these efforts and should therefore be embraced by those entrusted to lead the process to develop tobacco policy in Zambia.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
The Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC) requires countries to develop and implement multi-sectoral tobacco control strategies, including policies and legislation. Zambia, potentially faced by a rising problem of tobacco smoking, signed the FCTC in 2008 but has been unable to enact a tobacco policy for over a decade.
OBJECTIVE
This study explores the role of 'principled engagement', a key element of the theoretical framework for collaborative governance, in Zambia's delayed success to develop a comprehensive tobacco control policy.
METHODS
This was a qualitative case study of key stakeholders in the collaborative process of trying to develop a tobacco policy in Zambia. Participan-ts were sampled from across various sectors, including government departments and civil society, comprising anti-tobacco activists and researchers. A total of 27 key informant interviews were undertaken. We supplemented the interview data with a document review of relevant policies and legislation. Data were analysed using thematic analysis.
RESULTS
Several factors hindered efforts to attain principled engagement, including the adverse legal and socioeconomic environment in which the collaborative regime evolves; poor planning of meetings and frequent changes in tobacco focal point persons; lack of active and meaningful participation; and communication challenges among the key stakeholders. These collaborative dynamics, coupled with the opposition to tobacco control efforts from within some government departments, revealed the inadequacy of the current collaborative governance regime to facilitate enactment of a comprehensive tobacco control policy in Zambia.
CONCLUSION
Efforts to develop a comprehensive tobacco control policy in Zambia will require addressing challenges such as disagreements, communication, and leadership at engagement level across interested sectors. We further argue that principled engagement has a greater role to play in unlocking these efforts and should therefore be embraced by those entrusted to lead the process to develop tobacco policy in Zambia.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37212391
doi: 10.1080/16549716.2023.2212959
pmc: PMC10208213
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2212959Références
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016 Oct 24;13(10):
pubmed: 27783060
Tob Control. 2016 Jul;25(4):483-7
pubmed: 26135987
Global Health. 2018 Jan 16;14(1):5
pubmed: 29338793
Tob Control. 2022 Jun;31(Suppl 1):s26-s32
pubmed: 35078910
Nicotine Tob Res. 2020 Dec 12;22(12):2238-2245
pubmed: 31608412
BMC Public Health. 2018 Aug 15;18(Suppl 1):959
pubmed: 30168392
Lancet. 2015 Mar 14;385(9972):1029-43
pubmed: 25784350
Tob Control. 2019 Jun;28(Suppl 2):s94-s96
pubmed: 30659104
Tob Control. 2019 Jul;28(4):386-393
pubmed: 30045974
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2021 Jun 1;46(3):435-465
pubmed: 33647948
J Am Coll Dent. 2014 Summer;81(3):14-8
pubmed: 25951678
Tob Control. 2014 Nov;23(6):518-23
pubmed: 23788605
PLoS Med. 2016 Sep 20;13(9):e1002125
pubmed: 27649386
BMC Public Health. 2018 Aug 15;18(Suppl 1):962
pubmed: 30168399
BMC Public Health. 2018 Aug 15;18(Suppl 1):960
pubmed: 30168390
Lancet Public Health. 2017 Apr;2(4):e166-e174
pubmed: 29253448
Annu Rev Public Health. 2017 Mar 20;38:329-349
pubmed: 28125390
Health Policy Plan. 2018 Apr 1;33(3):420-428
pubmed: 29401223
BMC Public Health. 2022 Jan 31;22(1):205
pubmed: 35101017
Glob Health Res Policy. 2017 Jul 10;2:19
pubmed: 29202087
J Glob Health Rep. 2020 Apr 03;4:e2020015
pubmed: 33184609
Crit Public Health. 2023;33(1):25-36
pubmed: 36776543
BMC Public Health. 2018 Aug 15;18(Suppl 1):954
pubmed: 30168395
Tob Prev Cessat. 2020 Dec 22;6:72
pubmed: 33426382
Prev Med. 2016 Oct;91S:S16-S22
pubmed: 26876626