Radiation doses to mediastinal organs at risk in early-stage unfavorable Hodgkin lymphoma- a risk stratified analysis of the GHSG HD17 trial.
dosimetry
involved-field radiotherapy
involved-node radiotherapy
radiation oncology
radiation treatment
survivorship
Journal
Frontiers in oncology
ISSN: 2234-943X
Titre abrégé: Front Oncol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101568867
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2023
2023
Historique:
received:
10
03
2023
accepted:
14
04
2023
medline:
22
5
2023
pubmed:
22
5
2023
entrez:
22
5
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG) HD17 trial established the omission of radiotherapy (RT) for patients with early-stage unfavorable Hodgkin lymphoma being PET-negative after 2 cycles of BEACOPP escalated plus 2 cycles of ABVD. This patient group reveals heterogeneity in characteristics and disease extent which prompted us to perform a decisive dosimetric analysis according to GHSG risk factors. This may help to tailor RT individually balancing risks and benefits. For quality assurance, RT-plans were requested from the treating facilities (n= 141) and analyzed centrally. Dose-volume histograms were scanned either paper-based or digitally to obtain doses to mediastinal organs. These were registered and compared according to GHSG risk factors. Overall, RT plans of 176 patients were requested, 139 of which had dosimetric information on target volumes within the mediastinum. Most of these patients were stage II (92.8%), had no B-symptoms (79.1%) and were aged < 50 years (89.9%). Risk factors were present in 8.6% (extranodal involvement), 31.7% (bulky disease), 46.0% (elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate) and 64.0% (three involved areas), respectively. The presence of bulky disease significantly affected the mean RT doses to the heart (p=0.005) and to the left lung (median: 11.3 Gy vs. 9.9 Gy; p=0.042) as well as V5 of the right and left lung, respectively (median right lung: 67.4% vs. 51.0%; p=0.011; median left lung: 65.9% vs. 54.2%; p=0.008). Significant differences in similar organs at risk parameters could be found between the sub-cohorts with the presence or absence of extranodal involvement, respectively. In contrast, an elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate did not deteriorate dosimetry significantly. No association of any risk factor with radiation doses to the female breast was found. Pre-chemotherapy risk factors may help to predict potential RT exposure to normal organs and to critically review treatment indication. Individualized risk-benefit evaluations for patients with HL in early-stage unfavorable disease are mandatory.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37213291
doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1183906
pmc: PMC10196378
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
1183906Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 Oertel, Hering, Baues, Kittel, Fuchs, Kriz, Kröger, Vordermark, Herfarth, Engenhart-Cabillic, Lukas, Haverkamp, Borchmann and Eich.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Authors HE and MO report support of the present work from the German Cancer Aid. Author KH reports grants or contracts from Roche Pharma. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011 Oct 1;81(2):490-7
pubmed: 20800383
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2021 Jun 1;113(6):760-769
pubmed: 33351090
J Clin Oncol. 2010 Sep 20;28(27):4199-206
pubmed: 20713848
Am J Clin Oncol. 2004 Jun;27(3):279-84
pubmed: 15170148
J Clin Oncol. 2014 Apr 20;32(12):1188-94
pubmed: 24637998
JAMA Oncol. 2020 Jun 1;6(6):872-880
pubmed: 32352505
Strahlenther Onkol. 2008 Aug;184(8):406-10
pubmed: 18956517
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004 Mar 15;58(4):1121-7
pubmed: 15001253
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015 Feb 23;107(4):
pubmed: 25713164
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008 Aug 1;71(5):1419-24
pubmed: 18234433
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Jun 1;35(16):1786-1794
pubmed: 28291393
Blood. 2018 Oct 18;132(16):1635-1646
pubmed: 30108066
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004 Mar 1;58(3):805-8
pubmed: 14967437
Cancer. 1983 Dec 15;52(12):2223-6
pubmed: 6640492
J Clin Oncol. 2021 Nov 10;39(32):3591-3601
pubmed: 34388007
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014 Jul 15;89(4):854-62
pubmed: 23790512
Lancet. 2018 Dec 23;390(10114):2790-2802
pubmed: 29061295
J Clin Oncol. 2023 Feb 20;41(6):1193-1199
pubmed: 36508302
J Clin Oncol. 2003 Sep 15;21(18):3431-9
pubmed: 12885835
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007 Nov 15;69(4):1187-92
pubmed: 17703895
Blood. 2007 Mar 1;109(5):1878-86
pubmed: 17119114
Adv Radiat Oncol. 2022 Dec 30;8(3):101169
pubmed: 36896214
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2018 Feb 1;100(2):498-506
pubmed: 29153331
Strahlenther Onkol. 2021 Jan;197(1):56-62
pubmed: 32945894
Lancet Oncol. 2021 Feb;22(2):223-234
pubmed: 33539742
BMC Cancer. 2022 Jun 18;22(1):672
pubmed: 35717166
J Clin Oncol. 2019 Nov 1;37(31):2835-2845
pubmed: 31498753
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2021 Mar 26;118(12):205-211
pubmed: 34024324
Cancer. 2007 Dec 1;110(11):2576-86
pubmed: 17941006
N Engl J Med. 2015 Apr 23;372(17):1598-607
pubmed: 25901426
N Engl J Med. 2015 Dec 24;373(26):2499-511
pubmed: 26699166
Strahlenther Onkol. 2017 Feb;193(2):109-115
pubmed: 27596217
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2015 May 1;92(1):46-53
pubmed: 25863753
N Engl J Med. 2013 Mar 14;368(11):987-98
pubmed: 23484825
Blood. 2018 Mar 29;131(13):1456-1463
pubmed: 29437590
J Clin Oncol. 2001 Jun 1;19(11):2905-14
pubmed: 11387364