Learning and Predicting from Dynamic Models for COVID-19 Patient Monitoring.
decision support
inverse regression
longitudinal data analysis
prediction
statistical graphics
Journal
Statistical science : a review journal of the Institute of Mathematical Statistics
ISSN: 0883-4237
Titre abrégé: Stat Sci
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 100962994
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
May 2022
May 2022
Historique:
medline:
22
5
2023
pubmed:
22
5
2023
entrez:
22
5
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
COVID-19 has challenged health systems to learn how to learn. This paper describes the context, methods and challenges for learning to improve COVID-19 care at one academic health center. Challenges to learning include: (1) choosing a right clinical target; (2) designing methods for accurate predictions by borrowing strength from prior patients' experiences; (3) communicating the methodology to clinicians so they understand and trust it; (4) communicating the predictions to the patient at the moment of clinical decision; and (5) continuously evaluating and revising the methods so they adapt to changing patients and clinical demands. To illustrate these challenges, this paper contrasts two statistical modeling approaches - prospective longitudinal models in common use and retrospective analogues complementary in the COVID-19 context - for predicting future biomarker trajectories and major clinical events. The methods are applied to and validated on a cohort of 1,678 patients who were hospitalized with COVID-19 during the early months of the pandemic. We emphasize graphical tools to promote physician learning and inform clinical decision making.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37213435
doi: 10.1214/22-sts861
pmc: PMC10198065
mid: NIHMS1844199
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
251-265Subventions
Organisme : NIGMS NIH HHS
ID : T32 GM136577
Pays : United States
Références
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019 Dec 31;20(1):1
pubmed: 31888507
Int J Med Inform. 2020 Oct;142:104258
pubmed: 32927229
Brief Bioinform. 2021 Nov 5;22(6):
pubmed: 34081102
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jul 9;23(7):e29514
pubmed: 34081611
J Biomed Inform. 2016 Dec;64:87-92
pubmed: 27693565
Sci Rep. 2021 Aug 19;11(1):16936
pubmed: 34413324
J Law Biosci. 2014 Apr 28;1(2):202-208
pubmed: 27774161
Ann Intern Med. 2021 Jan;174(1):33-41
pubmed: 32960645
J Am Stat Assoc. 2018;113(524):1541-1549
pubmed: 30774169
JAMA. 2012 Apr 11;307(14):1513-6
pubmed: 22419800
Biometrics. 2000 Jun;56(2):337-44
pubmed: 10877287
Stat Med. 2014 Aug 15;33(18):3167-78
pubmed: 24676841
Int J Epidemiol. 2021 Nov 10;50(5):1731-1743
pubmed: 33729514
JAMA. 2018 Dec 4;320(21):2199-2200
pubmed: 30398550
Biometrics. 2006 Jun;62(2):432-45
pubmed: 16918907
Rev Med Virol. 2021 Jan;31(1):1-10
pubmed: 32845042
Biometrics. 1999 Sep;55(3):978-83
pubmed: 11315038
Am J Epidemiol. 2021 Oct 1;190(10):2094-2106
pubmed: 33984860
Ann Intern Med. 2021 Jun;174(6):777-785
pubmed: 33646849
Smart Health (Amst). 2021 Apr;20:100178
pubmed: 33521226
J Clin Invest. 2019 Mar 1;129(3):944-945
pubmed: 30688662
Lancet Infect Dis. 2022 Dec;22(12):e370-e376
pubmed: 36057267