Caseworker Cultural Mediator Involvement in Neurocritical Care for Patients and Families With Non-English Language Preference: A Quality Improvement Project.
culture and sensitivity
implementation
interpreters
mediators
neurocritical care
quality improvement research
Journal
Cureus
ISSN: 2168-8184
Titre abrégé: Cureus
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101596737
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Apr 2023
Apr 2023
Historique:
accepted:
16
04
2023
medline:
22
5
2023
pubmed:
22
5
2023
entrez:
22
5
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Objective To describe Harborview Medical Center's experience with the involvement of caseworker cultural mediators (CCM) for patients requiring neurocritical care. Methods Using univariate and multivariate analysis (model adjusted for age, Glasgow Coma Scale score (GCS), Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) Scores, mechanical ventilation, transition to comfort measures only (CMO), and death by neurologic criteria), we examined CCM team members' involvement in the care of Amharic/Cambodian/Khmer/Somali/Spanish/Vietnamese patients admitted to our neurocritical care service between 2014-2022, factors associated with CCM utilization, and changes in CCM utilization after a QI initiative was implemented in 2020 to encourage healthcare providers to consult the CCM team. Results Compared to eligible patients (n=827) who did not receive CCM referral, patients with CCM involvement (n=121) were younger (49 [interquartile range, IQR 38,63] vs. 56 [IQR 42,68] years, p = 0.002), had greater illness severity (admission GCS 8.5 [IQR 3,14] vs. 14 [IQR 7,15], p < 0.001, SOFA scores (5 [IQR 2,8] vs. 4 [IQR2,6], p = 0.007), and more frequently required mechanical ventilation (67% vs. 40%, odds ratio, OR 3.07, 95% CI 2.06,4.64), with higher all-cause mortality (20% vs. 12%, RR 1.83, 95% CI 1.09, 2.95), and with a higher rate of transition to CMO (11.6% vs. 6.2%, OR 2.00, 95% CI 1.03;3.66). The CCM QI initiative was independently associated with increased CCM involvement (aOR 4.22, 95% CI [2.32;7.66]). Overall, 4/10 attempts made by CCMs to reach out to the family to provide support were declined by the family. CCMs reported providing cultural/emotional support (n=96, 79%), end-of-life counseling (n=16, 13%), conflict mediation (n=15, 12.4%), and facilitating goals of care meetings (n=4, 3.3%). Conclusions Among eligible patients, CCM consultations appeared to occur in patients with higher disease severity. Our QI initiative increased CCM involvement.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37214078
doi: 10.7759/cureus.37687
pmc: PMC10195074
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e37687Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023, Lele et al.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared financial relationships, which are detailed in the next section.
Références
J Immigr Minor Health. 2022 Jun;24(3):799-805
pubmed: 34328602
JAMA. 2020 Sep 15;324(11):1078-1097
pubmed: 32761206
BMJ Open. 2019 Nov 21;9(11):e032498
pubmed: 31753892
J Natl Med Assoc. 2008 Nov;100(11):1275-85
pubmed: 19024223
Soc Sci Med. 2001 Jun;52(11):1643-59
pubmed: 11327138
Patient Educ Couns. 2019 Dec;102(12):2192-2198
pubmed: 31272798
Med Arch. 2016 Feb;70(1):61-5
pubmed: 26980935
Patient Educ Couns. 2022 Jul;105(7):2346-2354
pubmed: 34857428
PLoS One. 2019 Jul 30;14(7):e0219971
pubmed: 31361783