Development, implementation and evaluation of patient decision aids supporting shared decision making in women with recurrent ovarian cancer.
Cancer care
Implementation
Patient decision aid
Patient involvement
Shared decision making
Journal
PEC innovation
ISSN: 2772-6282
Titre abrégé: PEC Innov
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 9918367980406676
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2023
Dec 2023
Historique:
received:
21
04
2022
revised:
12
11
2022
accepted:
26
12
2022
medline:
22
5
2023
pubmed:
22
5
2023
entrez:
22
5
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Shared decision making (SDM) and use of patient decision aids (PtDAs) are key components in patient-centered care in relapsed ovarian cancer. This paper describes the development and implementation process of PtDAs into a clinical routine in three departments. Two PtDAs were developed in collaboration between patients and clinicians. Acceptability and usability of the PtDAs were tested on clinicians and patients using items from the internationally validated questionnaire "Preparation for Decision Making Scale". Ten patients and 15 clinicians participated in the study. Most patients indicated that PtDAs would be helpful as preparation for the decision-making process with the clinicians. Ten (75%) of the clinicians responded that the PtDAs helped the patients to understand the benefits and disadvantages of each treatment option. Generally, the clinicians indicated that they would use SDM if they had a PtDA tailored to the clinical situation. Two PtDAs were systematically developed, tested, and implemented thereby supporting an SDM intervention. The PtDAs are still in use at the participating departments. This study was successful in reusing a generic template for a patient decision aid (PtDA) developed at one institution and implemented in two other institutions. This was guided by a well-described systematic development process for PtDAs.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37214495
doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2022.100120
pii: S2772-6282(22)00105-4
pmc: PMC10194391
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
100120Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.
Références
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2022 Jun;171:36-41
pubmed: 35606311
Patient Educ Couns. 2006 Feb;60(2):102-14
pubmed: 16442453
Med Decis Making. 2021 Oct;41(7):907-937
pubmed: 33319621
Acta Oncol. 2021 Apr;60(4):434-443
pubmed: 33651647
BMJ. 2017 Nov 6;359:j4891
pubmed: 29109079
BMJ. 2006 Aug 26;333(7565):417
pubmed: 16908462
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Jan 23;20(1):59
pubmed: 31973754
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2013;13 Suppl 2:S2
pubmed: 24625093
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2019 Oct 4;19(1):190
pubmed: 31585534
Acta Oncol. 2021 Aug;60(8):1032-1037
pubmed: 34010102
J Oncol Pract. 2018 Apr;14(4):229-235
pubmed: 29641952
J Eval Clin Pract. 2019 Dec;25(6):1121-1130
pubmed: 31140689
JAMA. 2017 Aug 15;318(7):657-658
pubmed: 28810006
Patient Educ Couns. 2010 Jan;78(1):130-3
pubmed: 19560303
N Engl J Med. 2012 Mar 1;366(9):780-1
pubmed: 22375967
Patient Educ Couns. 2021 Jul;104(7):1560-1567
pubmed: 33390303
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2015 Jun 10;15:45
pubmed: 26058557
J Gen Intern Med. 2012 Oct;27(10):1361-7
pubmed: 22618581
Int J Womens Health. 2019 Apr 30;11:287-299
pubmed: 31118829
BMJ. 2017 Apr 18;357:j1744
pubmed: 28420639
Urol Pract. 2019 Mar;6(2):93-99
pubmed: 34350322
Med Decis Making. 2010 Nov-Dec;30(6):701-11
pubmed: 21088131
Ann Oncol. 2017 Nov 1;28(suppl_8):viii51-viii56
pubmed: 29232464
Patient Educ Couns. 2019 Nov;102(11):1961-1968
pubmed: 31129012
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 12;4:CD001431
pubmed: 28402085