Betadine-soaked gauzes intraoperative sizing in breast augmentation surgery.

Betadine Breast augmentation Breast implant Breast sizing Gauzes Intraoperative breast sizing

Journal

JPRAS open
ISSN: 2352-5878
Titre abrégé: JPRAS Open
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101680420

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jun 2023
Historique:
received: 21 11 2022
accepted: 26 03 2023
medline: 22 5 2023
pubmed: 22 5 2023
entrez: 22 5 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

In breast augmentation surgery, the correct evaluation of the implant size required is crucial to achieve satisfactory final result. Intraoperative volume decision is usually made by the use of silicone gel breast sizers. Intraoperative sizers have some disadvantages: the progressive loss of structural integrity, the increased risk of cross infection, the high costs. However, during breast augmentation surgery, it is mandatory to fill and expand the newly dissected pocket. In our practice we fill the dissected space with Betadine-soaked and then squeezed gauzes. The use of multiple soaked gauzes as sizers is advantageous for the following reasons: they fill and expand the pocket, they are useful to check the volume and to show the circumferential contour of the breast, to keep the pocket clean while dissecting the second one, to check final hemostasis and to compare the two breasts' size before definitive implant insertion. We simulated an "intra operative setting" where standardized volume Betadine-soaked gauzes were packed into a breast pocket. This easily reproducible and accurate technique is inexpensive and produces reliable and highly satisfactory results; it can be incorporated into the practice of any surgeon performing breast augmentation. Evidence Based Medicine (EBM) level: IV.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37215685
doi: 10.1016/j.jpra.2023.03.004
pii: S2352-5878(23)00009-8
pmc: PMC10196793
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

89-93

Informations de copyright

© 2023 The Author(s).

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Références

Plast Surg Int. 2016;2016:6584810
pubmed: 27092273
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2013 Mar;95(2):87-92
pubmed: 23484986
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2008 Jan;32(1):126-9
pubmed: 17929080
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2015 Oct;68(10):1364-9
pubmed: 26116968
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010 Jun;125(6):1781-1787
pubmed: 20009790
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019 Dec;144(6):1312-1321
pubmed: 31764644
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011 Feb;127(2):1005-1006
pubmed: 21285827
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2013 Oct 07;1(6):e43
pubmed: 25289237

Auteurs

Giuseppe Pezone (G)

Unit of Plastic Surgery, University "Federico II" , Via Sergio Pansini, 5, Napoli, Naples 80131, Italy.

Annachiara Cavaliere (A)

Unit of Plastic Surgery, University "Federico II" , Via Sergio Pansini, 5, Napoli, Naples 80131, Italy.

Gisella Nele (G)

Ruesch Private Hospital, , Viale Maria Cristina di Savoia, 39, Napoli, Naples 80122, Italy.

Francesco D'Andrea (F)

Unit of Plastic Surgery, University "Federico II" , Via Sergio Pansini, 5, Napoli, Naples 80131, Italy.

Fabrizio Schonauer (F)

Unit of Plastic Surgery, University "Federico II" , Via Sergio Pansini, 5, Napoli, Naples 80131, Italy.

Classifications MeSH