Validation of the family focused mental health practice questionnaire in measuring health and social care professionals' family focused practice.


Journal

PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2023
Historique:
received: 27 10 2021
accepted: 25 04 2023
medline: 24 5 2023
pubmed: 22 5 2023
entrez: 22 5 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Parental mental illness is a major public health issue and there is growing evidence that family focused practice can improve outcomes for parents and their families. However, few reliable and valid instruments measure mental health and social care professionals' family focused practice. To explore the psychometric properties of the Family Focused Mental Health Practice Questionnaire in a population of health and social care professionals. Health and Social Care Professionals (n = 836) in Northern Ireland completed an adapted version of the Family Focused Mental Health Practice Questionnaire. Exploratory factor analysis was used to test the structure of the underlying dimensions in the questionnaire. The results, and theoretical considerations, guided construction of a model that could explain variation in respondents' items. This model was then validated using confirmatory factor analysis. Exploratory factor analysis revealed that solutions including 12 to 16 factors provided a good fit to the data and indicated underlying factors that could be meaningfully interpreted in line with existing literature. From these exploratory analyses, we derived a model that included 14 factors and tested this model with Confirmatory Factor Analysis. The results suggested 12 factors that summarized 46 items that were most optimal in reflecting family focused behaviours and professional and organizational factors. The 12 dimensions identified were meaningful and consistent with substantive theories: furthermore, their inter-correlations were consistent with known professional and organizational processes known to promote or hinder family focused practice. This psychometric evaluation reveals that the scale provides a meaningful measure of professionals' family focused practice within adult mental health and children's services, and the factors that hinder and enable practice in this area. The findings, therefore, support the use of this measure to benchmark and further develop family focused practice in both adult mental health and children's services.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Parental mental illness is a major public health issue and there is growing evidence that family focused practice can improve outcomes for parents and their families. However, few reliable and valid instruments measure mental health and social care professionals' family focused practice.
OBJECTIVES
To explore the psychometric properties of the Family Focused Mental Health Practice Questionnaire in a population of health and social care professionals.
METHODS
Health and Social Care Professionals (n = 836) in Northern Ireland completed an adapted version of the Family Focused Mental Health Practice Questionnaire. Exploratory factor analysis was used to test the structure of the underlying dimensions in the questionnaire. The results, and theoretical considerations, guided construction of a model that could explain variation in respondents' items. This model was then validated using confirmatory factor analysis.
RESULTS
Exploratory factor analysis revealed that solutions including 12 to 16 factors provided a good fit to the data and indicated underlying factors that could be meaningfully interpreted in line with existing literature. From these exploratory analyses, we derived a model that included 14 factors and tested this model with Confirmatory Factor Analysis. The results suggested 12 factors that summarized 46 items that were most optimal in reflecting family focused behaviours and professional and organizational factors. The 12 dimensions identified were meaningful and consistent with substantive theories: furthermore, their inter-correlations were consistent with known professional and organizational processes known to promote or hinder family focused practice.
CONCLUSION
This psychometric evaluation reveals that the scale provides a meaningful measure of professionals' family focused practice within adult mental health and children's services, and the factors that hinder and enable practice in this area. The findings, therefore, support the use of this measure to benchmark and further develop family focused practice in both adult mental health and children's services.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37216367
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0285835
pii: PONE-D-21-34357
pmc: PMC10202282
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e0285835

Informations de copyright

Copyright: © 2023 Grant et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Références

Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2019 Feb;28(1):351-360
pubmed: 30191650
ISRN Nurs. 2011;2011:708318
pubmed: 22007325
J Child Health Care. 2015 Dec;19(4):444-53
pubmed: 24486816
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2016 Apr;23(3-4):163-71
pubmed: 27170070
Front Psychiatry. 2019 May 07;10:305
pubmed: 31133896
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Aug 6;18(1):609
pubmed: 30081882
Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2018 Apr;27(2):672-682
pubmed: 28721701
Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2019 Feb;28(1):140-151
pubmed: 29949231
Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2017 Jun;26(3):238-248
pubmed: 28026142
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2012 Jan;51(1):8-17.e8
pubmed: 22176935
Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2018 Jul;31(4):358-362
pubmed: 29847344
PLoS One. 2018 Sep 13;13(9):e0203901
pubmed: 30212539
Lancet Public Health. 2019 Jun;4(6):e291-e300
pubmed: 31155222
J Adv Nurs. 2020 May;76(5):1255-1265
pubmed: 32012334
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2006 Aug;40(8):657-64
pubmed: 16866761
Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2015 Apr;24(2):169-80
pubmed: 25619407
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Dec 8;17(1):818
pubmed: 29221455
Front Psychiatry. 2019 Apr 02;10:163
pubmed: 31001149
Med J Aust. 2013 Aug 5;199(3 Suppl):S23-5
pubmed: 25369844
Arch Psychiatr Nurs. 2012 Apr;26(2):135-44
pubmed: 22449561
Int J Ment Health Syst. 2016 Oct 5;10:64
pubmed: 27752281

Auteurs

Anne Grant (A)

School of Nursing and Midwifery, Medical Biology Centre, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom.

Susan Lagdon (S)

School of Psychology, Ulster University, Coleraine, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom.

John Devaney (J)

School of Social and Political Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.

Gavin Davidson (G)

School of Social Sciences, Education and Social Work, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom.

Joe Duffy (J)

School of Social Sciences, Education and Social Work, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom.

Oliver Perra (O)

School of Nursing and Midwifery, Medical Biology Centre, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH