Quantification of gallium cryo-FIB milling damage in biological lamellae.
electron cryomicroscopy
focused-ion-beam milling
ribosome
template matching
Journal
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
ISSN: 1091-6490
Titre abrégé: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7505876
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 06 2023
06 06 2023
Historique:
medline:
24
5
2023
pubmed:
22
5
2023
entrez:
22
5
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Cryogenic electron microscopy (cryo-EM) can reveal the molecular details of biological processes in their native, cellular environment at atomic resolution. However, few cells are sufficiently thin to permit imaging with cryo-EM. Thinning of frozen cells to <500 nm lamellae by focused-ion-beam (FIB) milling has enabled visualization of cellular structures with cryo-EM. FIB milling represents a significant advance over prior approaches because of its ease of use, scalability, and lack of large-scale sample distortions. However, the amount of damage it causes to a thinned cell section has not yet been determined. We recently described an approach for detecting and identifying single molecules in cryo-EM images of cells using 2D template matching (2DTM). 2DTM is sensitive to small differences between a molecular model (template) and the detected structure (target). Here, we use 2DTM to demonstrate that under the standard conditions used for machining lamellae of biological samples, FIB milling introduces a layer of variable damage that extends to a depth of 60 nm from each lamella surface. This layer of damage limits the recovery of information for in situ structural biology. We find that the mechanism of FIB milling damage is distinct from radiation damage during cryo-EM imaging. By accounting for both electron scattering and FIB milling damage, we estimate that FIB milling damage with current protocols will negate the potential improvements from lamella thinning beyond 90 nm.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37216561
doi: 10.1073/pnas.2301852120
pmc: PMC10266028
doi:
Substances chimiques
Gallium
CH46OC8YV4
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e2301852120Subventions
Organisme : Howard Hughes Medical Institute
ID : N/A
Pays : United States
Références
J Struct Biol. 2007 Jan;157(1):38-46
pubmed: 16859925
J Struct Biol. 2015 Nov;192(2):216-21
pubmed: 26278980
Elife. 2022 Nov 16;11:
pubmed: 36382886
Elife. 2017 May 03;6:
pubmed: 28467302
J Struct Biol. 2005 Apr;150(1):109-21
pubmed: 15797735
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Jun 6;120(23):e2301852120
pubmed: 37216561
Nature. 2020 Nov;587(7832):157-161
pubmed: 33087927
Nat Commun. 2023 Feb 6;14(1):629
pubmed: 36746945
Protein Sci. 2021 Jan;30(1):70-82
pubmed: 32881101
Nat Protoc. 2020 Jun;15(6):2041-2070
pubmed: 32405053
J Microsc. 2006 Apr;222(Pt 1):42-7
pubmed: 16734713
IUCrJ. 2021 Sep 30;8(Pt 6):943-953
pubmed: 34804546
Methods Enzymol. 2010;481:371-88
pubmed: 20887865
J Struct Biol. 2020 May 1;210(2):107488
pubmed: 32126263
Elife. 2021 Jun 11;10:
pubmed: 34114559
Nature. 2020 Nov;587(7832):152-156
pubmed: 33087931
Elife. 2020 Mar 09;9:
pubmed: 32149604
Nat Methods. 2007 Mar;4(3):215-7
pubmed: 17277781
Elife. 2015 May 29;4:e06980
pubmed: 26023829
J Struct Biol. 2017 Feb;197(2):73-82
pubmed: 27444390
Nat Methods. 2018 Nov;15(11):955-961
pubmed: 30349041
Ultramicroscopy. 2022 Jul;237:113511
pubmed: 35367902
Elife. 2018 Mar 07;7:
pubmed: 29513216
Elife. 2022 Aug 25;11:
pubmed: 36005291
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Mar 20;109(12):4449-54
pubmed: 22392984
Trends Cell Biol. 1999 Feb;9(2):81-5
pubmed: 10087625
Elife. 2021 Dec 24;10:
pubmed: 34951584
Faraday Discuss. 2022 Nov 8;240(0):277-302
pubmed: 35913392
J Struct Biol. 2005 Oct;152(1):36-51
pubmed: 16182563
J Struct Biol. 2018 Oct;204(1):38-44
pubmed: 29981485
Nat Methods. 2021 Feb;18(2):186-193
pubmed: 33542511
J Struct Biol. 2004 Oct;148(1):131-5
pubmed: 15363793
Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2019 Apr;26(4):275-280
pubmed: 30911188