The proteasome regulator PSME4 modulates proteasome activity and antigen diversity to abrogate antitumor immunity in NSCLC.
Journal
Nature cancer
ISSN: 2662-1347
Titre abrégé: Nat Cancer
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101761119
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 2023
05 2023
Historique:
received:
30
05
2022
accepted:
10
04
2023
medline:
29
5
2023
pubmed:
23
5
2023
entrez:
22
5
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Immunotherapy revolutionized treatment options in cancer, yet the mechanisms underlying resistance in many patients remain poorly understood. Cellular proteasomes have been implicated in modulating antitumor immunity by regulating antigen processing, antigen presentation, inflammatory signaling and immune cell activation. However, whether and how proteasome complex heterogeneity may affect tumor progression and the response to immunotherapy has not been systematically examined. Here, we show that proteasome complex composition varies substantially across cancers and impacts tumor-immune interactions and the tumor microenvironment. Through profiling of the degradation landscape of patient-derived non-small-cell lung carcinoma samples, we find that the proteasome regulator PSME4 is upregulated in tumors, alters proteasome activity, attenuates presented antigenic diversity and associates with lack of response to immunotherapy. Collectively, our approach affords a paradigm by which proteasome composition heterogeneity and function should be examined across cancer types and targeted in the context of precision oncology.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37217651
doi: 10.1038/s43018-023-00557-4
pii: 10.1038/s43018-023-00557-4
doi:
Substances chimiques
Proteasome Endopeptidase Complex
EC 3.4.25.1
PSME4 protein, human
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
629-647Subventions
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MC_UP_1201/5
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MR/V033077/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature America, Inc.
Références
Johnson, D. B., Nebhan, C. A., Moslehi, J. J. & Balko, J. M. Immune-checkpoint inhibitors: long-term implications of toxicity. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 19, 254–267 (2022).
pubmed: 35082367
pmcid: 8790946
doi: 10.1038/s41571-022-00600-w
Rock, K. L., Reits, E. & Neefjes, J. Present yourself! By MHC class I and MHC class II molecules. Trends Immunol. 37, 724–737 (2016).
pubmed: 27614798
pmcid: 5159193
doi: 10.1016/j.it.2016.08.010
Rousseau, A. & Bertolotti, A. Regulation of proteasome assembly and activity in health and disease. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 19, 697–712 (2018).
pubmed: 30065390
doi: 10.1038/s41580-018-0040-z
Salzmann, U. et al. Mutational analysis of subunit iβ2 (MECL-1) demonstrates conservation of cleavage specificity between yeast and mammalian proteasomes. FEBS Lett. 454, 11–15 (1999).
pubmed: 10413086
doi: 10.1016/S0014-5793(99)00768-1
Driscoll, J., Brown, M. G., Finley, D. & Monaco, J. J. MHC-linked LMP gene products specifically alter peptidase activities of the proteasome. Nature 365, 262–264 (1993).
pubmed: 8371781
doi: 10.1038/365262a0
Gaczynska, M., Rock, K. L. & Goldberg, A. L. γ-Interferon and expression of MHC genes regulate peptide hydrolysis by proteasomes. Nature 365, 264–267 (1993).
pubmed: 8396732
doi: 10.1038/365264a0
Winter, M. B. et al. Immunoproteasome functions explained by divergence in cleavage specificity and regulation. eLife 6, e27364 (2017).
pubmed: 29182146
pmcid: 5705213
doi: 10.7554/eLife.27364
Chong, C. et al. High-throughput and sensitive immunopeptidomics platform reveals profound interferonγ-mediated remodeling of the human leukocyte antigen (HLA) ligandome. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 17, 533–548 (2018).
pubmed: 29242379
doi: 10.1074/mcp.TIR117.000383
Javitt, A. et al. Pro-inflammatory cytokines alter the immunopeptidome landscape by modulation of HLA-B expression. Front. Immunol. 10, 141 (2019).
pubmed: 30833945
pmcid: 6387973
doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.00141
Riaz, N. et al. Tumor and microenvironment evolution during immunotherapy with nivolumab. Cell 171, 934–949.e16 (2017).
pubmed: 29033130
pmcid: 5685550
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.09.028
Tripathi, S. C. et al. Immunoproteasome deficiency is a feature of non-small cell lung cancer with a mesenchymal phenotype and is associated with a poor outcome. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, E1555–E1564 (2016).
pubmed: 26929325
pmcid: 4801290
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1521812113
Kalaora, S. et al. Immunoproteasome expression is associated with better prognosis and response to checkpoint therapies in melanoma. Nat. Commun. 11, 896 (2020).
pubmed: 32060274
pmcid: 7021791
doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-14639-9
Blickwedehl, J. et al. The proteasome activator PA200 regulates tumor cell responsiveness to glutamine and resistance to ionizing radiation. Mol. Cancer Res. 10, 937–944 (2012).
pubmed: 22550082
pmcid: 5261820
doi: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-11-0493-T
Ustrell, V., Hoffman, L., Pratt, G. & Rechsteiner, M. Pa200, a nuclear proteasome activator involved in DNA repair. EMBO J. 21, 3516–3525 (2002).
pubmed: 12093752
pmcid: 126083
doi: 10.1093/emboj/cdf333
Welk, V. et al. Inhibition of proteasome activity induces formation of alternative proteasome complexes. J. Biol. Chem. 291, 13147–13159 (2016).
pubmed: 27129254
pmcid: 4933230
doi: 10.1074/jbc.M116.717652
Qian, M.-X. et al. Acetylation-mediated proteasomal degradation of core histones during DNA repair and spermatogenesis. Cell 153, 1012–1024 (2013).
pubmed: 23706739
pmcid: 3983474
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.04.032
Fabre, B. et al. Label-free quantitative proteomics reveals the dynamics of proteasome complexes composition and stoichiometry in a wide range of human cell lines. J. Proteome Res. 13, 3027–3037 (2014).
pubmed: 24804812
doi: 10.1021/pr500193k
Toste Rêgo, A. & da Fonseca, P. C. A. Characterization of fully recombinant human 20S and 20S-PA200 proteasome complexes. Mol. Cell 76, 138–147.e5 (2019).
pubmed: 31473102
pmcid: 6863390
doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2019.07.014
Tsvetkov, P. et al. Suppression of 19S proteasome subunits marks emergence of an altered cell state in diverse cancers. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 382–387 (2017).
pubmed: 28028240
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1619067114
Tanahashi, N. et al. Molecular properties of the proteasome activator PA28 family proteins and γ-interferon regulation. Genes Cells 2, 195–211 (1997).
pubmed: 9189757
doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2443.1997.d01-308.x
Sánchez-Martín, D. et al. Proteasome activator complex PA28 identified as an accessible target in prostate cancer by in vivo selection of human antibodies. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 13791–13796 (2013).
pubmed: 23918357
pmcid: 3752212
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1300013110
Kisselev, A. F. F., Akopian, T. N. N., Woo, K. M. M. & Goldberg, A. L. L. The sizes of peptides generated from protein by mammalian 26 and 20 S proteasomes. Implications for understanding the degradative mechanism and antigen presentation. J. Biol. Chem. 274, 3363–3371 (1999).
pubmed: 9920878
doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.6.3363
Ruschak, A. M. & Kay, L. E. Proteasome allostery as a population shift between interchanging conformers. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, E3454–E3462 (2012).
pubmed: 23150576
pmcid: 3528551
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1213640109
Yamano, T. et al. Allele-selective effect of PA28 in MHC class I antigen processing. J. Immunol. 181, 1655–1664 (2008).
pubmed: 18641301
doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.181.3.1655
de Graaf, N. et al. PA28 and the proteasome immunosubunits play a central and independent role in the production of MHC class I-binding peptides in vivo. Eur. J. Immunol. 41, 926–935 (2011).
pubmed: 21360704
pmcid: 3100532
doi: 10.1002/eji.201041040
Murata, S., Takahama, Y., Kasahara, M. & Tanaka, K. The immunoproteasome and thymoproteasome: functions, evolution and human disease. Nat. Immunol. 19, 923–931 (2018).
pubmed: 30104634
doi: 10.1038/s41590-018-0186-z
Dick, T. P. et al. Coordinated dual cleavages induced by the proteasome regulator PA28 lead to dominant MHC ligands. Cell 86, 253–262 (1996).
pubmed: 8706130
doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80097-5
Wolf-Levy, H. et al. Revealing the cellular degradome by mass spectrometry analysis of proteasome-cleaved peptides. Nat. Biotechnol. 36, 1110–1116 (2018).
doi: 10.1038/nbt.4279
Javitt, A. & Merbl, Y. Global views of proteasome-mediated degradation by mass spectrometry. Expert Rev. Proteomics https://doi.org/10.1080/14789450.2019.1651979 (2019).
Litchfield, K. et al. Meta-analysis of tumor- and T cell-intrinsic mechanisms of sensitization to checkpoint inhibition. Cell 184, 596–614.e14 (2021).
pubmed: 33508232
pmcid: 7933824
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2021.01.002
Kim, J. Y., Choi, J. K. & Jung, H. Genome-wide methylation patterns predict clinical benefit of immunotherapy in lung cancer. Clin. Epigenetics 12, 1–10 (2020).
doi: 10.1186/s13148-020-00907-4
Gillette, M. A. et al. Proteogenomic characterization reveals therapeutic vulnerabilities in lung adenocarcinoma. Cell 182, 200–225.e35 (2020).
pubmed: 32649874
pmcid: 7373300
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.06.013
Kahana, C. & Reiss, Y. Cell-free assay for ubiquitin-independent proteasomal protein degradation. Methods Mol. Biol. 301, 83–96 (2005).
pubmed: 15917628
Pishesha, N., Harmand, T. J. & Ploegh, H. L. A guide to antigen processing and presentation. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 22, 751–764 (2022).
pubmed: 35418563
doi: 10.1038/s41577-022-00707-2
Lavin, Y., Kobayashi, S., Leader, A. & Rahman, A. Innate immune landscape in early lung adenocarcinoma by paired single-cell analyses. Cell 169, 750–757.e15 (2017).
pubmed: 28475900
pmcid: 5737939
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.04.014
Maier, B. et al. A conserved dendritic-cell regulatory program limits antitumour immunity. Nature 580, 257–262 (2020).
pubmed: 32269339
pmcid: 7787191
doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2134-y
Li, S., Wu, J., Zhu, S., Liu, Y. J. & Chen, J. Disease-associated plasmacytoid dendritic cells. Front. Immunol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2017.01268 (2017).
Morozov, A. V. & Karpov, V. L. Proteasomes and several aspects of their heterogeneity relevant to cancer. Front. Oncol. 9, 761 (2019).
pubmed: 31456945
pmcid: 6700291
doi: 10.3389/fonc.2019.00761
Cantin, A. M. & Richter, M. V. Cigarette smoke-induced proteostasis imbalance in obstructive lung diseases. Curr. Mol. Med. 12, 836–849 (2012).
pubmed: 22697342
doi: 10.2174/156652412801318746
Kammerl, I. E. et al. Dissecting the molecular effects of cigarette smoke on proteasome function. J. Proteomics 193, 1–9 (2019).
pubmed: 30557664
doi: 10.1016/j.jprot.2018.12.015
Srinivas, U. S., Tan, B. W. Q., Vellayappan, B. A. & Jeyasekharan, A. D. ROS and the DNA damage response in cancer. Redox Biol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.redox.2018.101084 (2019).
Young, J. H. et al. Computational discovery of pathway-level genetic vulnerabilities in non-small-cell lung cancer. Bioinformatics 32, 1373–1379 (2016).
pubmed: 26755624
pmcid: 4848405
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw010
Jiang, T.-X. et al. Proteasome activator PA200 maintains stability of histone marks during transcription and aging. Theranostics 11, 1458 (2021).
pubmed: 33391545
pmcid: 7738882
doi: 10.7150/thno.48744
Wani, P. S., Rowland, M. A., Ondracek, A., Deeds, E. J. & Roelofs, J. Maturation of the proteasome core particle induces an affinity switch that controls regulatory particle association. Nat. Commun. 6, 6384 (2015).
pubmed: 25812915
doi: 10.1038/ncomms7384
Marques, A. J., Glanemann, C., Ramos, P. C. & Dohmen, R. J. The C-terminal extension of the β7 subunit and activator complexes stabilize nascent 20 S proteasomes and promote their maturation. J. Biol. Chem. 282, 34869–34876 (2007).
pubmed: 17911101
doi: 10.1074/jbc.M705836200
Boulpicante, M. et al. Tumors escape immunosurveillance by overexpressing the proteasome activator PSME3. Oncoimmunology 9, 1761205 (2020).
pubmed: 32923122
pmcid: 7458623
doi: 10.1080/2162402X.2020.1761205
Sahu, I. & Glickman, M. H. Structural insights into substrate recognition and processing by the 20S proteasome. Biomolecules 11, 1–15 (2021).
doi: 10.3390/biom11020148
Huang, L., Marvin, J. M., Tatsis, N. & Eisenlohr, L. C. Cutting edge: selective role of ubiquitin in MHC class I antigen presentation. J. Immunol. 186, 1904–1908 (2011).
pubmed: 21239720
doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1003411
Wei, J. et al. Varied role of ubiquitylation in generating MHC class I peptide ligands. J. Immunol. 198, 3835 (2017).
pubmed: 28363906
doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1602122
Abi Habib, J., Lesenfants, J., Vigneron, N. & Van den Eynde, B. J. Functional differences between proteasome subtypes. Cells 11, 421 (2022).
pubmed: 35159231
pmcid: 8834425
doi: 10.3390/cells11030421
van Endert, P. Intracellular recycling and cross-presentation by MHC class I molecules. Immunol. Rev. 272, 80–96 (2016).
pubmed: 27319344
doi: 10.1111/imr.12424
Buneeva, O. A. & Medvedev, A. E. Ubiquitin-independent degradation of proteins in proteasomes. Biochem. (Mosc.) Suppl. B Biomed. Chem. 12, 203–219 (2018).
Mamrosh, J. L. et al. A systematic interrogation of MHC class I peptide presentation identifies constitutive and compensatory protein degradation pathways. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.10.07.463289 (2022).
Yewdell, J. W., Dersh, D. & Fåhraeus, R. Peptide channeling: the key to MHC class I immunosurveillance? Trends Cell Biol. 29, 929–939 (2019).
pubmed: 31662235
doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2019.09.004
Blum, J. S., Wearsch, P. A. & Cresswell, P. Pathways of antigen processing. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 31, 443–473 (2013).
pubmed: 23298205
pmcid: 4026165
doi: 10.1146/annurev-immunol-032712-095910
Lev, A. et al. Compartmentalized MHC class I antigen processing enhances immunosurveillance by circumventing the law of mass action. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 6964–6969 (2010).
pubmed: 20351281
pmcid: 2872426
doi: 10.1073/pnas.0910997107
Yewdell, J. W., Norbury, C. C. & Bennink, J. R. Mechanisms of exogenous antigen presentation by MHC class I molecules in vitro and in vivo: implications for generating CD8
pubmed: 10399005
doi: 10.1016/S0065-2776(08)60785-3
Harel, M. et al. Proteomics of melanoma response to immunotherapy reveals mitochondrial dependence. Cell 179, 236–250.e18 (2019).
pubmed: 31495571
pmcid: 7993352
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2019.08.012
Spits, M. & Neefjes, J. Immunoproteasomes and immunotherapy—a smoking gun for lung cancer? J. Thorac. Dis. 8, E558–E563 (2016).
pubmed: 27501321
pmcid: 4958817
doi: 10.21037/jtd.2016.05.21
Boshuizen, J. & Peeper, D. S. Rational cancer treatment combinations: an urgent clinical need. Mol. Cell 78, 1002–1018 (2020).
pubmed: 32559422
doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2020.05.031
Pfirschke, C. et al. Immunogenic chemotherapy sensitizes tumors to checkpoint blockade therapy. Immunity 44, 343–354 (2016).
pubmed: 26872698
pmcid: 4758865
doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2015.11.024
Mariathasan, S. et al. TGFβ attenuates tumour response to PD-L1 blockade by contributing to exclusion of T cells. Nature 554, 544–548 (2018).
pubmed: 29443960
pmcid: 6028240
doi: 10.1038/nature25501
McDermott, D. F. et al. Clinical activity and molecular correlates of response to atezolizumab alone or in combination with bevacizumab versus sunitinib in renal cell carcinoma. Nat. Med. 24, 749–757 (2018).
pubmed: 29867230
pmcid: 6721896
doi: 10.1038/s41591-018-0053-3
Snyder, A. et al. Genetic basis for clinical response to CTLA-4 blockade in melanoma. New Engl. J. Med. 371, 2189–2199 (2014).
pubmed: 25409260
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1406498
Hugo, W. et al. Genomic and transcriptomic features of response to anti-PD-1 therapy in metastatic melanoma. Cell 165, 35–44 (2016).
pubmed: 26997480
pmcid: 4808437
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.02.065
Van Allen, E. M. et al. Genomic correlates of response to CTLA-4 blockade in metastatic melanoma. Science 350, 207–211 (2015).
pubmed: 26359337
pmcid: 5054517
doi: 10.1126/science.aad0095
Gu, Z., Eils, R. & Schlesner, M. Complex heatmaps reveal patterns and correlations in multidimensional genomic data. Bioinformatics 32, 2847–2849 (2016).
pubmed: 27207943
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw313
Wickam, H. ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis (Springer-Verlag New York, 2016).
Subramanian, A. et al. Gene set enrichment analysis: a knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 15545–15550 (2005).
pubmed: 16199517
pmcid: 1239896
doi: 10.1073/pnas.0506580102
Trujillo, J. A., Sweis, R. F., Bao, R. & Luke, J. J. T cell-inflamed versus non-T cell-inflamed tumors: a conceptual framework for cancer immunotherapy drug development and combination therapy selection. Cancer Immunol. Res. 6, 990–1000 (2018).
pubmed: 30181337
pmcid: 6145135
doi: 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-18-0277
Spranger, S., Bao, R. & Gajewski, T. F. Melanoma-intrinsic β-catenin signalling prevents anti-tumour immunity. Nature 523, 231–235 (2015).
pubmed: 25970248
doi: 10.1038/nature14404
Uhlen, M. et al. A pathology atlas of the human cancer transcriptome. Science 357, eaan2507 (2017).
pubmed: 28818916
doi: 10.1126/science.aan2507
Thul, P. J. et al. A subcellular map of the human proteome. Science 356, 6340 (2017).
doi: 10.1126/science.aal3321
Uhlén, M. et al. Tissue-based map of the human proteome. Science 347, 6220 (2015).
doi: 10.1126/science.1260419
Welk, V. et al. Proteasome activator PA200 regulates myofibroblast differentiation. Sci. Rep. 9, 1–11 (2019).
doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-51665-0
Klotz, L. et al. Comprehensive clinical profiling of the Gauting locoregional lung adenocarcinoma donors. Cancer Med. 8, 1486–1499 (2019).
pubmed: 30806043
pmcid: 6488114
doi: 10.1002/cam4.2031
Kohen, R. et al. UTAP: User-friendly Transcriptome Analysis Pipeline. BMC Bioinf. 20, 1–7 (2019).
doi: 10.1186/s12859-019-2728-2
Stuart, T. et al. Comprehensive integration of single-cell data. Cell 177, 1888–1902.e21 (2019).
pubmed: 31178118
pmcid: 6687398
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2019.05.031
Grün, D. et al. Single-cell messenger RNA sequencing reveals rare intestinal cell types. Nature 525, 251–255 (2015).
pubmed: 26287467
doi: 10.1038/nature14966
Maier, B. et al. A conserved dendritic-cell regulatory program limits antitumour immunity. Nature 580, 257–262 (2020).
pubmed: 32269339
pmcid: 7787191
doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2134-y
Heng, T. S. P. et al. The immunological genome project: networks of gene expression in immune cells. Nat. Immunol. 9, 1091–1094 (2008).
pubmed: 18800157
doi: 10.1038/ni1008-1091
Raudvere, U. et al. G:Profiler: a web server for functional enrichment analysis and conversions of gene lists (2019 update). Nucleic Acids Res. 47, W191–W198 (2019).
pubmed: 31066453
pmcid: 6602461
doi: 10.1093/nar/gkz369
Love, M. I., Huber, W. & Anders, S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 15, 550 (2014).
pubmed: 25516281
pmcid: 4302049
doi: 10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8
Vizcaíno, J. A. et al. 2016 update of the PRIDE database and its related tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, D447–D456 (2016).
pubmed: 26527722
doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv1145