Outcomes of U-shaped internal fixation in the treatment of avulsion fracture of calcaneal tubercle.
Avulsion fracture of calcaneal tubercle
Efficacy
U-shaped internal fixation
Journal
BMC musculoskeletal disorders
ISSN: 1471-2474
Titre abrégé: BMC Musculoskelet Disord
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968565
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
22 May 2023
22 May 2023
Historique:
received:
11
04
2023
accepted:
17
05
2023
medline:
24
5
2023
pubmed:
23
5
2023
entrez:
22
5
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The purpose of this study was to analyze the efficacy of U-shaped internal fixation for calcaneal tubercle fracture after nearly 3 years of case follow-up and data collection. We retrospectively analyzed the collected data from 16 patients with avulsion fracture of calcaneal tubercle between December 2018 and February 2021 at our institute. All patients were required to conform to regular follow up postoperatively. X-ray film was applied to all cases. The American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Association (AOFAS) score, Cedell score and the visual analog scale (VAS) were used to evaluate functional results. All patients achieved bone union. The preoperative AOFAS score was 26.34 ± 3.34, which was significantly different from 91.38 ± 6.15 half a year after operation (p = 0.003). The preoperative Cedell score was 31.05 ± 4.18 and the score half a year after operation was 92.17 ± 5.39(p = 0.011). The VAS score was 8.91 ± 1.51 before operation and decreased to 0.58 ± 1.31 half a year after operation (p = 0.014). In the treatments of calcaneal tubercle fracture, U-shaped internal fixation is a new attempt. Through the short-term follow-up study, we found that its therapeutic effect is excellent, which is a recommended treatment in clinic.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The purpose of this study was to analyze the efficacy of U-shaped internal fixation for calcaneal tubercle fracture after nearly 3 years of case follow-up and data collection.
METHOD
METHODS
We retrospectively analyzed the collected data from 16 patients with avulsion fracture of calcaneal tubercle between December 2018 and February 2021 at our institute. All patients were required to conform to regular follow up postoperatively. X-ray film was applied to all cases. The American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Association (AOFAS) score, Cedell score and the visual analog scale (VAS) were used to evaluate functional results.
RESULTS
RESULTS
All patients achieved bone union. The preoperative AOFAS score was 26.34 ± 3.34, which was significantly different from 91.38 ± 6.15 half a year after operation (p = 0.003). The preoperative Cedell score was 31.05 ± 4.18 and the score half a year after operation was 92.17 ± 5.39(p = 0.011). The VAS score was 8.91 ± 1.51 before operation and decreased to 0.58 ± 1.31 half a year after operation (p = 0.014).
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
In the treatments of calcaneal tubercle fracture, U-shaped internal fixation is a new attempt. Through the short-term follow-up study, we found that its therapeutic effect is excellent, which is a recommended treatment in clinic.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37217900
doi: 10.1186/s12891-023-06542-3
pii: 10.1186/s12891-023-06542-3
pmc: PMC10201737
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
408Subventions
Organisme : Ningbo Medical Science and Technology Project
ID : 2021Y56
Organisme : Ningbo Medical Science and Technology Project
ID : 2021Y56
Organisme : Ningbo Medical Science and Technology Project
ID : 2021Y56
Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
J Surg Case Rep. 2023 Apr 26;2023(4):rjad173
pubmed: 37124579
Foot Ankle Surg. 2018 Feb;24(1):45-48
pubmed: 29413773
J Orthop. 2022 Sep 14;34:282-287
pubmed: 36158039
J Orthop Surg Res. 2016 Aug 22;11(1):92
pubmed: 27550340
Foot Ankle Int. 2008 Aug;29(8):863-6
pubmed: 18752789
Int Orthop. 2022 Jun;46(6):1413-1422
pubmed: 35333959
Foot Ankle Spec. 2015 Feb;8(1):10-7
pubmed: 25205682
J Orthop Surg Res. 2019 Aug 8;14(1):254
pubmed: 31395080
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021 Jun 21;22(1):567
pubmed: 34154601
J Orthop. 2019 Sep 12;18:132-137
pubmed: 32021019
Acta Biomed. 2018 Jan 19;89(1-S):138-150
pubmed: 29350643
J Foot Ankle Surg. 2018 Jan - Feb;57(1):191-195
pubmed: 29153287
Clin Interv Aging. 2021 Feb 15;16:275-280
pubmed: 33623377
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021 Dec 15;22(1):1043
pubmed: 34911525
Int Orthop. 2021 Sep;45(9):2365-2373
pubmed: 34333675
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021 Dec 10;22(1):1033
pubmed: 34893055
Orthop Surg. 2013 Aug;5(3):196-202
pubmed: 24002837
J Foot Ankle Surg. 2012 Jan-Feb;51(1):133-4
pubmed: 22112302
Foot Ankle Int. 2007 Nov;28(11):1183-6
pubmed: 18021588
Surg Radiol Anat. 2010 Feb;32(2):115-22
pubmed: 19777154
J Foot Ankle Surg. 2019 May;58(3):423-426
pubmed: 30745267
J Foot Ankle Surg. 2016 Jul-Aug;55(4):891-3
pubmed: 27067200
J Orthop Surg Res. 2018 Jun 7;13(1):142
pubmed: 29880004
J Foot Ankle Surg. 2016 Jan-Feb;55(1):157-60
pubmed: 26440932
Foot Ankle Int. 2006 Mar;27(3):196-201
pubmed: 16539902
Case Rep Orthop. 2018 Nov 11;2018:6207024
pubmed: 30534455
J Orthop Trauma. 2019 Aug;33 Suppl 1:S44-S45
pubmed: 31290836
J Foot Ankle Surg. 2012 Jan-Feb;51(1):123-7
pubmed: 22055492
Front Surg. 2021 May 28;8:620964
pubmed: 34124129
Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 2010 Jul;27(3):381-92
pubmed: 20691371
J Foot Ankle Surg. 2013 Nov-Dec;52(6):762-5
pubmed: 24160723
Clin Orthop Surg. 2012 Jun;4(2):134-8
pubmed: 22662299
J Foot Ankle Surg. 2016 Mar-Apr;55(2):310-3
pubmed: 25451203
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2022 Aug;48(4):3157-3163
pubmed: 34989813
J Orthop Sci. 2016 Sep;21(5):690-3
pubmed: 26740442