Transcriptomic analysis of benznidazole-resistant and susceptible Trypanosoma cruzi populations.
Benznidazole
Chagas disease
RNAseq
Resistance
Transcriptomics
Trypanosoma cruzi
Journal
Parasites & vectors
ISSN: 1756-3305
Titre abrégé: Parasit Vectors
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101462774
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
22 May 2023
22 May 2023
Historique:
received:
08
12
2022
accepted:
16
04
2023
medline:
24
5
2023
pubmed:
23
5
2023
entrez:
22
5
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Chagas disease (CD), caused by the parasite Trypanosoma cruzi, is a serious public health concern in Latin America. Nifurtimox and benznidazole (BZ), the only two drugs currently approved for the treatment of CD, have very low efficacies in the chronic phase of the disease and several toxic side effects. Trypanosoma cruzi strains that are naturally resistant to both drugs have been reported. We performed a comparative transcriptomic analysis of wild-type and BZ-resistant T. cruzi populations using high-throughput RNA sequencing to elucidate the metabolic pathways related to clinical drug resistance and identify promising molecular targets for the development of new drugs for treating CD. All complementary DNA (cDNA) libraries were constructed from the epimastigote forms of each line, sequenced and analysed using the Prinseq and Trimmomatic tools for the quality analysis, STAR as the aligner for mapping the reads against the reference genome (T. cruzi Dm28c-2018), the Bioconductor package EdgeR for statistical analysis of differential expression and the Python-based library GOATools for the functional enrichment analysis. The analytical pipeline with an adjusted P-value of < 0.05 and fold-change > 1.5 identified 1819 transcripts that were differentially expressed (DE) between wild-type and BZ-resistant T. cruzi populations. Of these, 1522 (83.7%) presented functional annotations and 297 (16.2%) were assigned as hypothetical proteins. In total, 1067 transcripts were upregulated and 752 were downregulated in the BZ-resistant T. cruzi population. Functional enrichment analysis of the DE transcripts identified 10 and 111 functional categories enriched for the up- and downregulated transcripts, respectively. Through functional analysis we identified several biological processes potentially associated with the BZ-resistant phenotype: cellular amino acid metabolic processes, translation, proteolysis, protein phosphorylation, RNA modification, DNA repair, generation of precursor metabolites and energy, oxidation-reduction processes, protein folding, purine nucleotide metabolic processes and lipid biosynthetic processes. The transcriptomic profile of T. cruzi revealed a robust set of genes from different metabolic pathways associated with the BZ-resistant phenotype, proving that T. cruzi resistance mechanisms are multifactorial and complex. Biological processes associated with parasite drug resistance include antioxidant defenses and RNA processing. The identified transcripts, such as ascorbate peroxidase (APX) and iron superoxide dismutase (Fe-SOD), provide important information on the resistant phenotype. These DE transcripts can be further evaluated as molecular targets for new drugs against CD.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Chagas disease (CD), caused by the parasite Trypanosoma cruzi, is a serious public health concern in Latin America. Nifurtimox and benznidazole (BZ), the only two drugs currently approved for the treatment of CD, have very low efficacies in the chronic phase of the disease and several toxic side effects. Trypanosoma cruzi strains that are naturally resistant to both drugs have been reported. We performed a comparative transcriptomic analysis of wild-type and BZ-resistant T. cruzi populations using high-throughput RNA sequencing to elucidate the metabolic pathways related to clinical drug resistance and identify promising molecular targets for the development of new drugs for treating CD.
METHODS
METHODS
All complementary DNA (cDNA) libraries were constructed from the epimastigote forms of each line, sequenced and analysed using the Prinseq and Trimmomatic tools for the quality analysis, STAR as the aligner for mapping the reads against the reference genome (T. cruzi Dm28c-2018), the Bioconductor package EdgeR for statistical analysis of differential expression and the Python-based library GOATools for the functional enrichment analysis.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The analytical pipeline with an adjusted P-value of < 0.05 and fold-change > 1.5 identified 1819 transcripts that were differentially expressed (DE) between wild-type and BZ-resistant T. cruzi populations. Of these, 1522 (83.7%) presented functional annotations and 297 (16.2%) were assigned as hypothetical proteins. In total, 1067 transcripts were upregulated and 752 were downregulated in the BZ-resistant T. cruzi population. Functional enrichment analysis of the DE transcripts identified 10 and 111 functional categories enriched for the up- and downregulated transcripts, respectively. Through functional analysis we identified several biological processes potentially associated with the BZ-resistant phenotype: cellular amino acid metabolic processes, translation, proteolysis, protein phosphorylation, RNA modification, DNA repair, generation of precursor metabolites and energy, oxidation-reduction processes, protein folding, purine nucleotide metabolic processes and lipid biosynthetic processes.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
The transcriptomic profile of T. cruzi revealed a robust set of genes from different metabolic pathways associated with the BZ-resistant phenotype, proving that T. cruzi resistance mechanisms are multifactorial and complex. Biological processes associated with parasite drug resistance include antioxidant defenses and RNA processing. The identified transcripts, such as ascorbate peroxidase (APX) and iron superoxide dismutase (Fe-SOD), provide important information on the resistant phenotype. These DE transcripts can be further evaluated as molecular targets for new drugs against CD.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37217925
doi: 10.1186/s13071-023-05775-4
pii: 10.1186/s13071-023-05775-4
pmc: PMC10204194
doi:
Substances chimiques
benzonidazole
YC42NRJ1ZD
Trypanocidal Agents
0
Nitroimidazoles
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
167Subventions
Organisme : Programa INOVA FIOCRUZ
ID : VPPCB-007-FIO-18-2-94
Organisme : Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais
ID : FAPEMIG - APQ 02816-21
Organisme : Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
ID : CNPq 304158/2019-4
Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
Microb Genom. 2018 May;4(5):
pubmed: 29708484
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2014 May 22;8(5):e2844
pubmed: 24853684
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 Aug 16;91(17):8278-82
pubmed: 8058795
Int J Parasitol. 2011 Mar;41(3-4):429-38
pubmed: 21163262
BMC Genomics. 2015 Jul 04;16:499
pubmed: 26141959
Biochemistry. 2001 Dec 11;40(49):14985-94
pubmed: 11732919
F1000Res. 2016 Jun 20;5:1438
pubmed: 27508061
Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2022 Feb 28;117:e210401
pubmed: 35239945
Bioinformatics. 2013 Jan 1;29(1):15-21
pubmed: 23104886
Elife. 2020 Dec 01;9:
pubmed: 33258448
Bioinformatics. 2011 Mar 15;27(6):863-4
pubmed: 21278185
Curr Genomics. 2018 Feb;19(2):87-97
pubmed: 29491737
Mol Biochem Parasitol. 2010 Oct;173(2):53-63
pubmed: 20594956
Korean J Parasitol. 2013 Aug;51(4):413-9
pubmed: 24039283
Eur J Intern Med. 2017 Sep;43:6-15
pubmed: 28502864
FEBS Lett. 2003 Nov 6;554(1-2):201-5
pubmed: 14596940
Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1987;81(5):755-9
pubmed: 3130683
Acta Trop. 2006 Nov;100(1-2):119-32
pubmed: 17113553
Protein Sci. 2003 May;12(5):1039-50
pubmed: 12717026
C R Acad Sci III. 1995 Dec;318(12):1239-44
pubmed: 8745639
Nat Rev Microbiol. 2006 Mar;4(3):229-36
pubmed: 16489349
PLoS One. 2016 Aug 09;11(8):e0159197
pubmed: 27505626
Free Radic Biol Med. 2016 Jun;95:27-42
pubmed: 26923386
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2017 Nov;97(5):1289-1303
pubmed: 29016289
PLoS Pathog. 2017 Dec 14;13(12):e1006767
pubmed: 29240831
Parasit Vectors. 2012 Aug 07;5:161
pubmed: 22871258
Exp Parasitol. 2018 Jan;184:1-10
pubmed: 29162347
Pathogens. 2019 Oct 19;8(4):
pubmed: 31635071
Exp Parasitol. 2006 Dec;114(4):341-4
pubmed: 16725140
Mutat Res Rev Mutat Res. 2016 Jan-Mar;767:8-22
pubmed: 27036062
Parasitol Res. 2013 Jun;112(6):2341-51
pubmed: 23572046
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Apr 1;105(13):5022-7
pubmed: 18367671
Mol Microbiol. 2017 Dec;106(5):704-718
pubmed: 28884498
Nucleic Acids Res. 2010 Jan;38(Database issue):D457-62
pubmed: 19843604
Bioinformatics. 2014 Aug 1;30(15):2114-20
pubmed: 24695404
Am J Reprod Immunol. 2018 Jul;80(1):e12852
pubmed: 29577492
Mol Biochem Parasitol. 2006 Apr;146(2):151-62
pubmed: 16442642
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2021 Mar 22;15(3):e0009269
pubmed: 33750958
Parasit Vectors. 2011 Sep 05;4:169
pubmed: 21892937
J Proteome Res. 2008 Jun;7(6):2357-67
pubmed: 18435557
Parasitol Res. 2009 Mar;104(4):835-44
pubmed: 19018566
Free Radic Biol Med. 2006 Jan 15;40(2):210-25
pubmed: 16413404
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2022 Oct 19;16(10):e0010845
pubmed: 36260546
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2012 Jan;56(1):115-23
pubmed: 22037852
Genome Biol. 2010;11(10):R106
pubmed: 20979621
Parasit Vectors. 2020 May 14;13(1):255
pubmed: 32410662
Bioinformatics. 2010 Jan 1;26(1):139-40
pubmed: 19910308
Exp Parasitol. 2015 Jan;148:73-80
pubmed: 25450774
Sci Rep. 2018 Jul 18;8(1):10872
pubmed: 30022098
Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo. 1976 Nov-Dec;18(6):450-5
pubmed: 828295
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2018 Jan 10;12(1):e0006170
pubmed: 29320490
Parasit Vectors. 2020 Nov 30;13(1):600
pubmed: 33256787
Mol Aspects Med. 2004 Feb-Apr;25(1-2):211-20
pubmed: 15051329
PeerJ. 2017 Mar 8;5:e3017
pubmed: 28286708
Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2018 Jul 26;113(9):e180162
pubmed: 30066751
Future Microbiol. 2009 Oct;4(8):1065-74
pubmed: 19824794
Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2015 May;110(3):433-44
pubmed: 25946152
Nat Prod Rep. 2003 Aug;20(4):367-81
pubmed: 12964833
Bull World Health Organ. 1985;63(4):721-6
pubmed: 3936634
PLoS Pathog. 2016 Apr 05;12(4):e1005511
pubmed: 27046031
J Cell Biochem. 2017 Jul;118(7):1936-1945
pubmed: 28276600
J Biol Chem. 1983 Jan 10;258(1):125-30
pubmed: 6336744
Nucleic Acids Res. 2009 Jun;37(10):3407-17
pubmed: 19336417
Sci Rep. 2018 May 30;8(1):8399
pubmed: 29849031
Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2012 Jun;107(4):494-502
pubmed: 22666860