Five-year follow-up study on quantitative muscle magnetic resonance imaging in facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy: The link to clinical outcome.
Biomarker
Clinical outcome
FSHD
MRI
Muscle imaging
Journal
Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle
ISSN: 2190-6009
Titre abrégé: J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 101552883
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 2023
08 2023
Historique:
revised:
10
03
2023
received:
24
10
2022
accepted:
15
04
2023
medline:
7
8
2023
pubmed:
23
5
2023
entrez:
23
5
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
It is unclear how changes in quantitative muscle magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) relate to changes in clinical outcome in facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD), although this information is crucial for optimal use of MRI as imaging biomarker in trials. We therefore assessed muscle MRI and clinical outcome measures in a large longitudinal prospective cohort study. All patients were assessed by MRI at baseline and at 5-year follow-up, employing 2pt-Dixon and turbo inversion recovery magnitude (TIRM) sequences, after which fat fraction and TIRM positivity of 19 leg muscles were determined bilaterally. The MRI compound score (CoS) was defined as the mean fat fraction of all muscles weighted for cross-sectional area. Clinical outcome measures included the Ricci-score, FSHD clinical score (FSHD-CS), MRC sumscore (MRC-SS), and motor-function-measure (MFM). We included 105 FSHD patients [mean age 54 ± 14 years, median Ricci-score 7 (range 0-10)]. The median change over 5 years' time in the MRI-CoS was 2.0% (range -4.6 to +12.1; P < 0.001). The median change over 5 years' time in clinical outcome measures was small in all measures, with z-scores ranging from 5.0 to 7.2 (P < 0.001). The change in MRI-CoS correlated with change in FSHD-CS and Ricci-score (ρ = 0.25, respectively; ρ = 0.23, P < 0.05). The largest median increase in MRI-CoS was seen in baseline subgroups with an MRI-CoS 20-40% (6.1%), with ≥2 TIRM positive muscles (3.5%) or with an FSHD-CS 5-10 (3.1%). This 5-year study showed significant changes in MRI and clinical outcome measures and a significant correlation between changes in MRI-CoS and changes in clinical outcome measures. In addition, we identified subgroups of patients that are most prone to radiological disease progression. This knowledge further establishes quantitative MRI parameters as prognostic biomarkers in FSHD and as efficacy biomarkers in upcoming clinical trials.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
It is unclear how changes in quantitative muscle magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) relate to changes in clinical outcome in facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD), although this information is crucial for optimal use of MRI as imaging biomarker in trials. We therefore assessed muscle MRI and clinical outcome measures in a large longitudinal prospective cohort study.
METHODS
All patients were assessed by MRI at baseline and at 5-year follow-up, employing 2pt-Dixon and turbo inversion recovery magnitude (TIRM) sequences, after which fat fraction and TIRM positivity of 19 leg muscles were determined bilaterally. The MRI compound score (CoS) was defined as the mean fat fraction of all muscles weighted for cross-sectional area. Clinical outcome measures included the Ricci-score, FSHD clinical score (FSHD-CS), MRC sumscore (MRC-SS), and motor-function-measure (MFM).
RESULTS
We included 105 FSHD patients [mean age 54 ± 14 years, median Ricci-score 7 (range 0-10)]. The median change over 5 years' time in the MRI-CoS was 2.0% (range -4.6 to +12.1; P < 0.001). The median change over 5 years' time in clinical outcome measures was small in all measures, with z-scores ranging from 5.0 to 7.2 (P < 0.001). The change in MRI-CoS correlated with change in FSHD-CS and Ricci-score (ρ = 0.25, respectively; ρ = 0.23, P < 0.05). The largest median increase in MRI-CoS was seen in baseline subgroups with an MRI-CoS 20-40% (6.1%), with ≥2 TIRM positive muscles (3.5%) or with an FSHD-CS 5-10 (3.1%).
CONCLUSIONS
This 5-year study showed significant changes in MRI and clinical outcome measures and a significant correlation between changes in MRI-CoS and changes in clinical outcome measures. In addition, we identified subgroups of patients that are most prone to radiological disease progression. This knowledge further establishes quantitative MRI parameters as prognostic biomarkers in FSHD and as efficacy biomarkers in upcoming clinical trials.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37218549
doi: 10.1002/jcsm.13250
pmc: PMC10401523
doi:
Substances chimiques
Biomarkers
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1695-1706Informations de copyright
© 2023 The Authors. Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society on Sarcopenia, Cachexia and Wasting Disorders.
Références
J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2023 Aug;14(4):1695-1706
pubmed: 37218549
Muscle Nerve. 2018 Jun;57(6):905-912
pubmed: 29236297
J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2021 Dec;12(6):2259-2261
pubmed: 34904399
Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2019 May 16;6(6):1033-1045
pubmed: 31211167
Neurology. 2022 Aug 30;99(9):e877-e889
pubmed: 35750498
Nat Methods. 2012 Jun 28;9(7):676-82
pubmed: 22743772
J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2019 Dec;10(6):1258-1265
pubmed: 31668022
Neurology. 2018 Jul 31;91(5):e444-e454
pubmed: 29997197
Ann Neurol. 2020 Oct;88(4):669-681
pubmed: 32495452
Eur Radiol. 2021 Jun;31(6):4264-4276
pubmed: 33219846
J Neurol. 2017 Mar;264(3):438-447
pubmed: 28000006
Front Neurol. 2019 Feb 11;10:78
pubmed: 30804884
Muscle Nerve. 2010 Aug;42(2):213-7
pubmed: 20544930
Neuromuscul Disord. 2021 Sep;31(9):907-918
pubmed: 34404575
Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2012 Feb;23(1):149-72, xii
pubmed: 22239881
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2021 Feb;33(2):291-301
pubmed: 32198628
PLoS One. 2014 Jan 14;9(1):e85416
pubmed: 24454861
Continuum (Minneap Minn). 2019 Dec;25(6):1662-1681
pubmed: 31794465
Neuromuscul Disord. 2012 Oct 1;22 Suppl 2:S54-67
pubmed: 22980769
Neuromuscul Disord. 2023 Jan;33(1):65-75
pubmed: 36369218
Commun Med (Lond). 2022 Dec 1;2(1):155
pubmed: 36450865
J Neurol. 2019 May;266(5):1127-1135
pubmed: 30778707
Neurology. 2020 Mar 3;94(9):e897-e909
pubmed: 32024675
Brain. 2010 Oct;133(10):2838-44
pubmed: 20928945
Neuromuscul Disord. 2005 Jul;15(7):463-70
pubmed: 16106528
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021 Mar 10;22(1):262
pubmed: 33691664
Neurology. 2020 Sep 1;95(9):e1211-e1221
pubmed: 32611642
Neurology. 2017 Nov 14;89(20):2057-2065
pubmed: 29030457
Magn Reson Med. 2020 May;83(5):1825-1836
pubmed: 31677312
Muscle Nerve. 2018 Jun;57(6):872-874
pubmed: 29328515
Neurology. 2016 May 3;86(18):1700-7
pubmed: 27037227
J Neurol. 2016 Jun;263(6):1204-14
pubmed: 27126453
PLoS One. 2017 Aug 25;12(8):e0183825
pubmed: 28841698