Fiber-Type-Specific Hypertrophy with the Use of Low-Load Blood Flow Restriction Resistance Training: A Systematic Review.
cross-sectional area
fiber type
katsu
muscle growth
occlusion
Journal
Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology
ISSN: 2411-5142
Titre abrégé: J Funct Morphol Kinesiol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101712257
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
27 Apr 2023
27 Apr 2023
Historique:
received:
01
03
2023
revised:
18
04
2023
accepted:
20
04
2023
medline:
23
5
2023
pubmed:
23
5
2023
entrez:
23
5
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Emerging evidence indicates that the use of low-load resistance training in combination with blood flow restriction (LL-BFR) can be an effective method to elicit increases in muscle size, with most research showing similar whole muscle development of the extremities compared to high-load (HL) training. It is conceivable that properties unique to LL-BFR such as greater ischemia, reperfusion, and metabolite accumulation may enhance the stress on type I fibers during training compared to the use of LLs without occlusion. Accordingly, the purpose of this paper was to systematically review the relevant literature on the fiber-type-specific response to LL-BFR and provide insights into future directions for research. A total of 11 studies met inclusion criteria. Results of the review suggest that the magnitude of type I fiber hypertrophy is at least as great, and sometimes greater, than type II hypertrophy when performing LL-BFR. This finding is in contrast to HL training, where the magnitude of type II fiber hypertrophy tends to be substantially greater than that of type I myofibers. However, limited data directly compare training with LL-BFR to nonoccluded LL or HL conditions, thus precluding the ability to draw strong inferences as to whether the absolute magnitude of type I hypertrophy is indeed greater in LL-BFR vs. traditional HL training. Moreover, it remains unclear as to whether combining LL-BFR with traditional HL training may enhance whole muscle hypertrophy via greater increases in type I myofiber cross-sectional area.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37218848
pii: jfmk8020051
doi: 10.3390/jfmk8020051
pmc: PMC10204387
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Références
J Physiol. 2012 Sep 1;590(17):4351-61
pubmed: 22802591
Sports Med. 2018 Feb;48(2):361-378
pubmed: 29043659
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2021 Jul;31(7):1420-1439
pubmed: 33735465
J Biomech. 2002 May;35(5):657-63
pubmed: 11955505
J Neurophysiol. 1965 May;28:560-80
pubmed: 14328454
Sports Biomech. 2008 Jan;7(1):137-57
pubmed: 18341141
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2021 Jul 1;131(1):158-173
pubmed: 34013752
Sports Med. 2018 May;48(5):1207-1220
pubmed: 29470825
Sports Med. 2004;34(10):663-79
pubmed: 15335243
Sports Med. 2018 Jan;48(1):137-151
pubmed: 28933024
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2019 Feb;51(2):288-298
pubmed: 30188363
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2020 Jun 1;128(6):1523-1532
pubmed: 32324471
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2003 Nov;58(11):999-1001
pubmed: 14630880
Front Physiol. 2019 May 29;10:649
pubmed: 31191347
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2021 Aug 1;131(2):643-660
pubmed: 33955259
Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2008 Oct;33(5):1050-65
pubmed: 18923583
J Epidemiol Community Health. 1998 Jun;52(6):377-84
pubmed: 9764259
Open Med. 2009;3(3):e123-30
pubmed: 21603045
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2021 Dec 1;131(6):1731-1749
pubmed: 34554017
Front Physiol. 2018 Apr 18;9:402
pubmed: 29720946
Acta Physiol (Oxf). 2020 Jan;228(1):e13302
pubmed: 31108025
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2019 Mar 1;126(3):578-592
pubmed: 30543499
Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2018 Feb 15;:
pubmed: 29446524
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2023 Apr 1;134(4):1047-1062
pubmed: 36825645
Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2020 Feb 1;318(2):R284-R295
pubmed: 31823670
Exp Gerontol. 2023 Mar;173:112083
pubmed: 36621699
J Hum Kinet. 2020 Aug 31;74:51-58
pubmed: 33312275
Sports Med. 2020 Nov;50(11):1983-1999
pubmed: 32740889
Physiol Rep. 2018 Apr;6(8):e13675
pubmed: 29673119
Acta Physiol (Oxf). 2014 Aug;211(4):634-46
pubmed: 24762334