Echo2Pheno: a deep-learning application to uncover echocardiographic phenotypes in conscious mice.


Journal

Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society
ISSN: 1432-1777
Titre abrégé: Mamm Genome
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9100916

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
06 2023
Historique:
received: 17 02 2023
accepted: 28 04 2023
medline: 26 6 2023
pubmed: 24 5 2023
entrez: 23 5 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Echocardiography, a rapid and cost-effective imaging technique, assesses cardiac function and structure. Despite its popularity in cardiovascular medicine and clinical research, image-derived phenotypic measurements are manually performed, requiring expert knowledge and training. Notwithstanding great progress in deep-learning applications in small animal echocardiography, the focus has so far only been on images of anesthetized rodents. We present here a new algorithm specifically designed for echocardiograms acquired in conscious mice called Echo2Pheno, an automatic statistical learning workflow for analyzing and interpreting high-throughput non-anesthetized transthoracic murine echocardiographic images in the presence of genetic knockouts. Echo2Pheno comprises a neural network module for echocardiographic image analysis and phenotypic measurements, including a statistical hypothesis-testing framework for assessing phenotypic differences between populations. Using 2159 images of 16 different knockout mouse strains of the German Mouse Clinic, Echo2Pheno accurately confirms known cardiovascular genotype-phenotype relationships (e.g., Dystrophin) and discovers novel genes (e.g., CCR4-NOT transcription complex subunit 6-like, Cnot6l, and synaptotagmin-like protein 4, Sytl4), which cause altered cardiovascular phenotypes, as verified by H&E-stained histological images. Echo2Pheno provides an important step toward automatic end-to-end learning for linking echocardiographic readouts to cardiovascular phenotypes of interest in conscious mice.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37221250
doi: 10.1007/s00335-023-09996-x
pii: 10.1007/s00335-023-09996-x
pmc: PMC10290584
doi:

Substances chimiques

Cnot6l protein, mouse EC 3.1.-
Ribonucleases EC 3.1.-

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

200-215

Informations de copyright

© 2023. The Author(s).

Références

Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2004 Feb;286(2):E252-60
pubmed: 14570702
Hypertension. 2020 Feb;75(2):285-292
pubmed: 31865786
Neuroimage. 2019 Feb 1;186:713-727
pubmed: 30502445
Sci Rep. 2021 Mar 22;11(1):6559
pubmed: 33753835
Physiol Genomics. 2003 Nov 11;15(3):165-76
pubmed: 14612588
Nature. 2023 Apr;616(7957):520-524
pubmed: 37020027
Neuron. 2011 Apr 28;70(2):252-65
pubmed: 21521612
Nat Rev Neurol. 2019 Jul;15(7):373-386
pubmed: 31147635
Circulation. 2020 Mar 3;141(9):e139-e596
pubmed: 31992061
Behav Brain Res. 2018 Oct 15;352:187-196
pubmed: 28966146
Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 2019 Apr 22;17(1):7
pubmed: 31010431
J Cell Mol Med. 2014 Dec;18(12):2530-5
pubmed: 25388378
Commun Chem. 2019;2:
pubmed: 32382661
PLoS One. 2016 May 31;11(5):e0156054
pubmed: 27243905
Int J Mol Sci. 2019 Jul 09;20(13):
pubmed: 31323913
Circ J. 2018 Feb 23;82(3):620-628
pubmed: 29415914
Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 2021 Aug 20;19(1):29
pubmed: 34416899
JAMA Cardiol. 2021 Jun 1;6(6):624-632
pubmed: 33599681
Skelet Muscle. 2017 Sep 12;7(1):19
pubmed: 28899419
Nat Med. 2012 Oct;18(10):1539-49
pubmed: 22961109
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2022 Oct 1;323(4):H628-H639
pubmed: 35984765
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2002 Jun;282(6):H2134-40
pubmed: 12003821
ACS Chem Neurosci. 2017 Dec 20;8(12):2759-2765
pubmed: 28880525
NPJ Digit Med. 2020 Jan 24;3:10
pubmed: 31993508
Genes Cells. 2011 Apr;16(4):368-79
pubmed: 21299754
Life Sci Alliance. 2018 Jul 16;1(4):e201800084
pubmed: 30456367
Biochem J. 2006 Jan 1;393(Pt 1):421-30
pubmed: 16185194
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Sep 1;94(3):481-505
pubmed: 31313449
J Biol Chem. 2013 Oct 18;288(42):30330-30344
pubmed: 23990461
Nat Commun. 2018 Oct 3;9(1):4065
pubmed: 30283131
Behav Genet. 2011 Jan;41(1):125-33
pubmed: 20798984

Auteurs

Christina Bukas (C)

Helmholtz AI, Helmholtz Zentrum München, Neuherberg, Germany.

Isabella Galter (I)

Institute of Experimental Genetics, German Research Center for Environmental Health, Neuherberg, Germany.

Patricia da Silva-Buttkus (P)

Institute of Experimental Genetics, German Mouse Clinic, German Research Center for Environmental Health, Ingolstädter Landstr. 1, 85764, Neuherberg, Germany.

Helmut Fuchs (H)

Institute of Experimental Genetics, German Mouse Clinic, German Research Center for Environmental Health, Ingolstädter Landstr. 1, 85764, Neuherberg, Germany.

Holger Maier (H)

Institute of Experimental Genetics, German Research Center for Environmental Health, Neuherberg, Germany.

Valerie Gailus-Durner (V)

Institute of Experimental Genetics, German Mouse Clinic, German Research Center for Environmental Health, Ingolstädter Landstr. 1, 85764, Neuherberg, Germany.

Christian L Müller (CL)

Helmholtz AI, Helmholtz Zentrum München, Neuherberg, Germany.
Institute of Computational Biology, Helmholtz Zentrum München, Neuherberg, Germany.
Department of Statistics, LMU München, Munich, Germany.
Center for Computational Mathematics, Flatiron Institute, New York, USA.

Martin Hrabě de Angelis (M)

Institute of Experimental Genetics, German Mouse Clinic, German Research Center for Environmental Health, Ingolstädter Landstr. 1, 85764, Neuherberg, Germany. martin.hrabedeangelis@helmholtz-munich.de.
Chair of Experimental Genetics, TUM School of Life Sciences, Technische Universität München, Freising, Germany. martin.hrabedeangelis@helmholtz-munich.de.
German Center for Diabetes Research (DZD), Neuherberg, Germany. martin.hrabedeangelis@helmholtz-munich.de.

Marie Piraud (M)

Helmholtz AI, Helmholtz Zentrum München, Neuherberg, Germany.

Nadine Spielmann (N)

Institute of Experimental Genetics, German Mouse Clinic, German Research Center for Environmental Health, Ingolstädter Landstr. 1, 85764, Neuherberg, Germany.

Articles similaires

Robotic Surgical Procedures Animals Humans Telemedicine Models, Animal

Odour generalisation and detection dog training.

Lyn Caldicott, Thomas W Pike, Helen E Zulch et al.
1.00
Animals Odorants Dogs Generalization, Psychological Smell

Selecting optimal software code descriptors-The case of Java.

Yegor Bugayenko, Zamira Kholmatova, Artem Kruglov et al.
1.00
Software Algorithms Programming Languages
Animals TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases Colorectal Neoplasms Colitis Mice

Classifications MeSH