Migraine care practices in primary care: results from a national US survey.

neurology primary care quality of care quality of life statistical modeling survey research

Journal

Family practice
ISSN: 1460-2229
Titre abrégé: Fam Pract
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8500875

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
23 May 2023
Historique:
medline: 24 5 2023
pubmed: 24 5 2023
entrez: 23 5 2023
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Primary care clinicians play a critical role in diagnosis and treatment of migraine, yet barriers exist. This national survey assessed barriers to diagnosis and treatment of migraine, preferred approaches to receiving migraine education, and familiarity with recent therapeutic innovations. The survey was created by the American Academy of Family Physicians (AAFP) and Eli Lilly and Company and distributed to a national sample through the AAFP National Research Network and affiliated PBRNs from mid-April through the end of May 2021. Initial analyses were descriptive statistics, ANOVAs, and Chi-Square tests. Individual and multivariate models were completed for: adult patients seen in a week; respondent years since residency; and adult patients with migraine seen in a week. Respondents who saw fewer patients were more likely to indicate unclear patient histories were a barrier to diagnosing. Respondents who saw more patients with migraine were more likely to indicate the priority of other comorbidities and insufficient time were barriers to diagnosing. Respondents who had been out of residency longer were more likely to change a treatment plan due to attack impact, quality of life, and medication cost. Respondents who had been out of residency shorter were more likely to prefer to learn from migraine/headache research scientists and use paper headache diaries. Results demonstrate differences in familiarity with migraine diagnosis and treatment options based on patients seen and years since residency. To maximise appropriate diagnosis within primary care, targeted efforts to increase familiarity and decrease barriers to migraine care should be implemented.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Primary care clinicians play a critical role in diagnosis and treatment of migraine, yet barriers exist. This national survey assessed barriers to diagnosis and treatment of migraine, preferred approaches to receiving migraine education, and familiarity with recent therapeutic innovations.
METHODS METHODS
The survey was created by the American Academy of Family Physicians (AAFP) and Eli Lilly and Company and distributed to a national sample through the AAFP National Research Network and affiliated PBRNs from mid-April through the end of May 2021. Initial analyses were descriptive statistics, ANOVAs, and Chi-Square tests. Individual and multivariate models were completed for: adult patients seen in a week; respondent years since residency; and adult patients with migraine seen in a week.
RESULTS RESULTS
Respondents who saw fewer patients were more likely to indicate unclear patient histories were a barrier to diagnosing. Respondents who saw more patients with migraine were more likely to indicate the priority of other comorbidities and insufficient time were barriers to diagnosing. Respondents who had been out of residency longer were more likely to change a treatment plan due to attack impact, quality of life, and medication cost. Respondents who had been out of residency shorter were more likely to prefer to learn from migraine/headache research scientists and use paper headache diaries.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Results demonstrate differences in familiarity with migraine diagnosis and treatment options based on patients seen and years since residency. To maximise appropriate diagnosis within primary care, targeted efforts to increase familiarity and decrease barriers to migraine care should be implemented.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37221301
pii: 7177377
doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmad054
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Subventions

Organisme : Eli Lilly and Company

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Auteurs

Elisabeth Callen (E)

American Academy of Family Physicians, Leawood, KS, United States.

Tarin Clay (T)

American Academy of Family Physicians, Leawood, KS, United States.

Jillian Alai (J)

American Academy of Family Physicians, Leawood, KS, United States.

Paul Crawford (P)

Department of Family Medicine, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, United States.

Adam Visconti (A)

Department of Family Medicine, MedStar Georgetown University, Washington, DC, United States.

Andrea Nederveld (A)

Department of Family Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, United States.

Inez Cruz (I)

Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, United States.

Bailey Perez (B)

University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, United States.

Karen L Roper (KL)

Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, KY, United States.

Tamara K Oser (TK)

Department of Family Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, United States.

May-Lorie Saint Laurent (ML)

Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, United States.

Yalda Jabbarpour (Y)

The Robert Graham Center, Washington, DC, United States.

Classifications MeSH