Exploring the use of ChatGPT in OBGYN: a bibliometric analysis of the first ChatGPT-related publications.
Artificial intelligence
Bibliometrics
ChatGPT
OBGYN literature
Research
Journal
Archives of gynecology and obstetrics
ISSN: 1432-0711
Titre abrégé: Arch Gynecol Obstet
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 8710213
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 2023
12 2023
Historique:
received:
29
03
2023
accepted:
08
05
2023
medline:
23
10
2023
pubmed:
24
5
2023
entrez:
24
5
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Little is known about the scientific literature regarding the new revolutionary tool, ChatGPT. We aim to perform a bibliometric analysis to identify ChatGPT-related publications in obstetrics and gynecology (OBGYN). A bibliometric study through PubMed database. We mined all ChatGPT-related publications using the search term "ChatGPT". Bibliometric data were obtained from the iCite database. We performed a descriptive analysis. We further compared IF among publications describing a study vs. other publications. Overall, 42 ChatGPT-related publications were published across 26 different journals during 69 days. Most publications were editorials (52%) and news/briefing (22%), with only one (2%) research article identified. Five (12%) publications described a study performed. No ChatGPT-related publications in OBGYN were found. The leading journal by the number of publications was Nature (24%), followed by Lancet Digital Health and Radiology (7%, for both). The main subjects of publications were ChatGPT's scientific writing quality (26%) and a description of ChatGPT (26%) followed by tested performance of ChatGPT (14%), authorship and ethical issues (10% for both topics).In a comparison of publications describing a study performed (n = 5) vs. other publications (n = 37), mean IF was lower in the study-publications (mean 6.25 ± 0 vs. 25.4 ± 21.6, p < .001). The study highlights main trends in ChatGPT-related publications. OBGYN is yet to be represented in this literature.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37222839
doi: 10.1007/s00404-023-07081-x
pii: 10.1007/s00404-023-07081-x
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1785-1789Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Références
ChatGPT, ChatGPT. https://openai.com/blog/chatgpt/ Accessed 15 Jan 2023
Biswas S (2023) ChatGPT and the future of medical writing. Radiology. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.223312
doi: 10.1148/radiol.223312
pubmed: 37581498
van Dis EAM et al (2023) ChatGPT: five priorities for research. Nature 614(7947):224–226
doi: 10.1038/d41586-023-00288-7
pubmed: 36737653
Else H (2023) Abstracts written by ChatGPT fool scientists. Nature 613(7944):423
doi: 10.1038/d41586-023-00056-7
pubmed: 36635510
Agarwal A et al (2016) Bibliometrics: tracking research impact by selecting the appropriate metrics. Asian J Androl 18(2):296–309
doi: 10.4103/1008-682X.171582
pubmed: 26806079
pmcid: 4770502
Kokol P, Blažun Vošner H, Završnik J (2021) Application of bibliometrics in medicine: a historical bibliometrics analysis. Health Info Libr J 38(2):125–138
doi: 10.1111/hir.12295
pubmed: 31995273
Fisher SA, Miller ES (2022) Critical evaluation of clinical research in obstetrics and gynecology. Clin Obstet Gynecol 65(2):290–301
doi: 10.1097/GRF.0000000000000695
pubmed: 35467576
Stokel-Walker C (2023) ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove. Nature 613(7945):620–621
doi: 10.1038/d41586-023-00107-z
pubmed: 36653617
Hackelöer M, Schmidt L, Verlohren S (2022) New advances in prediction and surveillance of preeclampsia: role of machine learning approaches and remote monitoring. Arch Gynecol Obstet. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-022-06864-y
doi: 10.1007/s00404-022-06864-y
pubmed: 36566477
pmcid: 9790089
Arezzo F et al (2022) A machine learning approach applied to gynecological ultrasound to predict progression-free survival in ovarian cancer patients. Arch Gynecol Obstet 306(6):2143–2154
doi: 10.1007/s00404-022-06578-1
pubmed: 35532797
pmcid: 9633520
Lee KS et al (2022) Association of preterm birth with medications: machine learning analysis using national health insurance data. Arch Gynecol Obstet 305(5):1369–1376
doi: 10.1007/s00404-022-06405-7
pubmed: 35038042
D’Amico RS et al (2023) I Asked a ChatGPT to Write an editorial about how we can incorporate chatbots into neurosurgical research and patient care. Neurosurgery. https://doi.org/10.1227/neu.0000000000002414
doi: 10.1227/neu.0000000000002414
pubmed: 37470488
Ahn C (2023) Exploring ChatGPT for information of cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Resuscitation 185:109729
doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2023.109729
pubmed: 36773836
Fijačko N et al (2023) Can ChatGPT pass the life support exams without entering the American heart association course? Resuscitation. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2023.109732
doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2023.109732
pubmed: 37730097
Stokel-Walker C (2022) AI bot ChatGPT writes smart essays - should professors worry? Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-022-04397-7
doi: 10.1038/d41586-022-04397-7
pubmed: 36494443