Primary and reproductive healthcare access and use among reproductive aged women and female family planning patients in 3 states.


Journal

PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2023
Historique:
received: 07 02 2023
accepted: 02 05 2023
medline: 26 5 2023
pubmed: 24 5 2023
entrez: 24 5 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Public funding plays a key role in reducing cost barriers to sexual and reproductive health (SRH) care in the United States. In this analysis, we examine sociodemographic and healthcare seeking profiles of individuals in three states where public funding for health services has recently changed: Arizona, Iowa, and Wisconsin. In addition, we examine associations between individuals' health insurance status and whether they experienced delays or had trouble in obtaining their preferred contraception. This descriptive study draws on data collected between 2018 to 2021 in two distinct cross-sectional surveys in each state, one among a representative sample of female residents aged 18-44 and the other among a representative sample of female patients ages eighteen and older seeking family planning services at healthcare sites that receive public funding to deliver this care. The majority of reproductive-aged women and female family planning patients across states reported having a personal healthcare provider, had received at least one SRH service in the preceding 12 months, and were using a method of birth control. Between 49-81% across groups reported receiving recent person-centered contraceptive care. At least one-fifth of each group reported wanting healthcare in the past year but not getting it, and between 10-19% reported a delay or trouble getting birth control in the past 12 months. Common reasons for these outcomes involved cost and insurance-related issues, as well as logistical ones. Among all populations except Wisconsin family planning clinic patients, those with no health insurance had greater odds of being delayed or having trouble getting desired birth control in the past 12 months than those with health insurance. These data serve as a baseline to monitor access and use of SRH services in Arizona, Wisconsin, Iowa in the wake of drastic family planning funding shifts that changed the availability and capacity of the family planning service infrastructure across the country. Continuing to monitor these SRH metrics is critical to understand the potential effect of current political shifts.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37224157
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0285825
pii: PONE-D-23-03559
pmc: PMC10208491
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e0285825

Informations de copyright

Copyright: © 2023 Fuentes et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Références

Contracept X. 2020 Jul 07;2:100032
pubmed: 32715289
Contracept X. 2022 Jul 25;4:100081
pubmed: 35965653
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2022 Jun 1;47(3):293-318
pubmed: 34847221
Am J Prev Med. 2019 Mar;56(3):343-351
pubmed: 30661886
Matern Child Health J. 2022 Nov;26(11):2185-2191
pubmed: 36114977
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2017 Jun;26(6):692-701
pubmed: 27710196
Womens Health Issues. 2020 Nov - Dec;30(6):436-445
pubmed: 32958369
F S Rep. 2020 Jul 09;1(2):83-93
pubmed: 34223223
Contraception. 2018 Jan;97(1):34-40
pubmed: 28935217
JMIR Res Protoc. 2023 Mar 15;12:e40675
pubmed: 36920469
Popul Res Policy Rev. 2022;41(6):2555-2583
pubmed: 36092460

Auteurs

Liza Fuentes (L)

Formerly of the Research Division, Guttmacher Institute, New York, New York, United States of America.

Ayana Douglas-Hall (A)

Research Division, Guttmacher Institute, New York, New York, United States of America.

Christina E Geddes (CE)

Research Division, Guttmacher Institute, New York, New York, United States of America.

Megan L Kavanaugh (ML)

Research Division, Guttmacher Institute, New York, New York, United States of America.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH