Application of systematic evidence mapping to identify available data on the potential human health hazards of selected market-relevant azo dyes.


Journal

Environment international
ISSN: 1873-6750
Titre abrégé: Environ Int
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 7807270

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
06 2023
Historique:
received: 13 10 2022
revised: 18 04 2023
accepted: 25 04 2023
medline: 6 6 2023
pubmed: 25 5 2023
entrez: 24 5 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Azo dyes are used in textiles and leather clothing. Human exposure can occur from wearing textiles containing azo dyes. Since the body's enzymes and microbiome can cleave azo dyes, potentially resulting in mutagenic or carcinogenic metabolites, there is also an indirect health concern on the parent compounds. While several hazardous azo dyes are banned, many more are still in use that have not been evaluated systematically for potential health concerns. This systematic evidence map (SEM) aims to compile and categorize the available toxicological evidence on the potential human health risks of a set of 30 market-relevant azo dyes. Peer-reviewed and gray literature was searched and over 20,000 studies were identified. These were filtered using Sciome Workbench for Interactive computer-Facilitated Text-mining (SWIFT) Review software with evidence stream tags (human, animal, in vitro) yielding 12,800 unique records. SWIFT Active (a machine-learning software) further facilitated title/abstract screening. DistillerSR software was used for additional title/abstract, full-text screening, and data extraction. 187 studies were identified that met populations, exposures, comparators, and outcomes (PECO) criteria. From this pool, 54 human, 78 animal, and 61 genotoxicity studies were extracted into a literature inventory. Toxicological evidence was abundant for three azo dyes (also used as food additives) and sparse for five of the remaining 27 compounds. Complementary search in ECHA's REACH database for summaries of unpublished study reports revealed evidence for all 30 dyes. The question arose of how this information can be fed into an SEM process. Proper identification of prioritized dyes from various databases (including U.S. EPA's CompTox Chemicals Dashboard) turned out to be a challenge. Evidence compiled by this SEM project can be evaluated for subsequent use in problem formulation efforts to inform potential regulatory needs and prepare for a more efficient and targeted evaluation in the future for human health assessments.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Azo dyes are used in textiles and leather clothing. Human exposure can occur from wearing textiles containing azo dyes. Since the body's enzymes and microbiome can cleave azo dyes, potentially resulting in mutagenic or carcinogenic metabolites, there is also an indirect health concern on the parent compounds. While several hazardous azo dyes are banned, many more are still in use that have not been evaluated systematically for potential health concerns. This systematic evidence map (SEM) aims to compile and categorize the available toxicological evidence on the potential human health risks of a set of 30 market-relevant azo dyes.
METHODS
Peer-reviewed and gray literature was searched and over 20,000 studies were identified. These were filtered using Sciome Workbench for Interactive computer-Facilitated Text-mining (SWIFT) Review software with evidence stream tags (human, animal, in vitro) yielding 12,800 unique records. SWIFT Active (a machine-learning software) further facilitated title/abstract screening. DistillerSR software was used for additional title/abstract, full-text screening, and data extraction.
RESULTS
187 studies were identified that met populations, exposures, comparators, and outcomes (PECO) criteria. From this pool, 54 human, 78 animal, and 61 genotoxicity studies were extracted into a literature inventory. Toxicological evidence was abundant for three azo dyes (also used as food additives) and sparse for five of the remaining 27 compounds. Complementary search in ECHA's REACH database for summaries of unpublished study reports revealed evidence for all 30 dyes. The question arose of how this information can be fed into an SEM process. Proper identification of prioritized dyes from various databases (including U.S. EPA's CompTox Chemicals Dashboard) turned out to be a challenge. Evidence compiled by this SEM project can be evaluated for subsequent use in problem formulation efforts to inform potential regulatory needs and prepare for a more efficient and targeted evaluation in the future for human health assessments.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37224677
pii: S0160-4120(23)00225-8
doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2023.107952
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Azo Compounds 0
Carcinogens 0
Coloring Agents 0
Mutagens 0

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S. Systematic Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

107952

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Auteurs

Channa Keshava (C)

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA), Office of Research and Development, Center for Public Health and Environmental Assessment (CPHEA), Chemical Pollutant Assessment Division (CPAD), 109 T.W. Alexander Dr, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711, USA. Electronic address: keshava.channa@epa.gov.

Suna Nicolai (S)

German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR), Department of Chemical and Product Safety, Max-Dohrn-Strasse 8-10, 10589 Berlin, Germany. Electronic address: Suna.Nicolai@bfr.bund.de.

Suryanarayana V Vulimiri (SV)

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA), Office of Research and Development, Center for Public Health and Environmental Assessment (CPHEA), Chemical Pollutant Assessment Division (CPAD), 109 T.W. Alexander Dr, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711, USA. Electronic address: vulimiri.sury@epa.gov.

Florenz A Cruz (FA)

German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR), Department of Chemical and Product Safety, Max-Dohrn-Strasse 8-10, 10589 Berlin, Germany.

Narges Ghoreishi (N)

German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR), Department of Exposure, Max-Dohrn-Strasse 8-10, 10589 Berlin, Germany. Electronic address: Narges.Ghoreishi@bfr.bund.de.

Sven Knueppel (S)

German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR), Department of Food Safety, Max-Dohrn-Strasse 8-10, 10589 Berlin, Germany. Electronic address: Sven.Knueppel@bfr.bund.de.

Ariane Lenzner (A)

German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR), Department of Chemical and Product Safety, Max-Dohrn-Strasse 8-10, 10589 Berlin, Germany. Electronic address: Ariane.Lenzner@bfr.bund.de.

Patrick Tarnow (P)

German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR), Department of Chemical and Product Safety, Max-Dohrn-Strasse 8-10, 10589 Berlin, Germany. Electronic address: Patrick.Tarnow@bfr.bund.de.

Jens T Vanselow (JT)

German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR), Department of Chemical and Product Safety, Max-Dohrn-Strasse 8-10, 10589 Berlin, Germany. Electronic address: Jens.Vanselow@bfr.bund.de.

Brittany Schulz (B)

Oak Ridge Associated Universities (ORAU), Environmental Protection Agency National Student Services Contract (EPA NSSC), 100 ORAU Way, Oak Ridge, TN 37830, USA. Electronic address: schulz.brittany@epa.gov.

Amanda Persad (A)

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA), Office of Research and Development, Center for Public Health and Environmental Assessment (CPHEA), Chemical Pollutant Assessment Division (CPAD), 109 T.W. Alexander Dr, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711, USA. Electronic address: persad.amanda@epa.gov.

Nancy Baker (N)

Leidos, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711, USA. Electronic address: Baker.Nancy@epa.gov.

Kristina A Thayer (KA)

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA), Office of Research and Development, Center for Public Health and Environmental Assessment (CPHEA), Chemical Pollutant Assessment Division (CPAD), 109 T.W. Alexander Dr, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711, USA. Electronic address: thayer.kris@epa.gov.

Antony J Williams (AJ)

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA), Office of Research and Development, Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure (CCTE), Research Triangle Park, NC 27711, USA. Electronic address: Williams.Antony@epa.gov.

Ralph Pirow (R)

German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR), Department of Chemical and Product Safety, Max-Dohrn-Strasse 8-10, 10589 Berlin, Germany. Electronic address: Ralph.Pirow@bfr.bund.de.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH