Bench Assessment of Work of Breathing During a Spontaneous Breathing Trial on Zero Pressure Support and Zero PEEP Compared to T-Piece.
Mechanical Ventilation
Spontaneous Breathing Trial
Weaning
Work of breathing
Journal
Respiratory care
ISSN: 1943-3654
Titre abrégé: Respir Care
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7510357
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 2023
06 2023
Historique:
pmc-release:
01
06
2024
medline:
26
5
2023
pubmed:
25
5
2023
entrez:
24
5
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Analysis of observational data suggests that both a T-piece and zero pressure support ventilation (PSV) and zero PEEP impose work of breathing (WOB) during a spontaneous breathing trial (SBT) similar to what a patient experiences after extubation. The aim of our study was to compare the WOB imposed by the T-piece with zero PSV and zero PEEP. We also compared the difference in WOB when using zero PSV and zero PEEP on 3 different ventilators. This study was conducted by using a breathing simulator that simulated 3 lung models (ie, normal, moderate ARDS, and COPD). Three ventilators were used and set to zero PSV and zero PEEP. The outcome variable was WOB expressed as mJ/L of tidal volume. An analysis of variance showed that WOB was statistically different between the T-piece and zero PSV and zero PEEP on all the ventilators (Servo-i, Servo-u, and Carescape R860). The absolute difference was lowest for the Carescape R860, which increased WOB by 5-6%, whereas the highest for Servo-u, which reduced the WOB by 15-21%. Work may be imposed or reduced during spontaneous breathing on zero PSV and zero PEEP when compared to T-piece. The unpredictable nature of how zero PSV and zero PEEP behaves on different ventilators makes it an imprecise SBT modality in the context of assessing extubation readiness.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Analysis of observational data suggests that both a T-piece and zero pressure support ventilation (PSV) and zero PEEP impose work of breathing (WOB) during a spontaneous breathing trial (SBT) similar to what a patient experiences after extubation. The aim of our study was to compare the WOB imposed by the T-piece with zero PSV and zero PEEP. We also compared the difference in WOB when using zero PSV and zero PEEP on 3 different ventilators.
METHODS
This study was conducted by using a breathing simulator that simulated 3 lung models (ie, normal, moderate ARDS, and COPD). Three ventilators were used and set to zero PSV and zero PEEP. The outcome variable was WOB expressed as mJ/L of tidal volume.
RESULTS
An analysis of variance showed that WOB was statistically different between the T-piece and zero PSV and zero PEEP on all the ventilators (Servo-i, Servo-u, and Carescape R860). The absolute difference was lowest for the Carescape R860, which increased WOB by 5-6%, whereas the highest for Servo-u, which reduced the WOB by 15-21%.
CONCLUSIONS
Work may be imposed or reduced during spontaneous breathing on zero PSV and zero PEEP when compared to T-piece. The unpredictable nature of how zero PSV and zero PEEP behaves on different ventilators makes it an imprecise SBT modality in the context of assessing extubation readiness.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37225650
pii: 68/6/767
doi: 10.4187/respcare.10642
pmc: PMC10209002
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
767-772Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 by Daedalus Enterprises.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Mr Chatburn discloses relationships with IngMar Medical, Vyaire, Inovytec, Aires, ProMedic, AutoMedx, and Elsevier. Dr Hatipoğlu discloses relationships with UpToDate and COPD. Dr Sameed has disclosed no conflicts of interest.
Références
Ann Transl Med. 2018 Sep;6(18):349
pubmed: 30370276
Am Rev Respir Dis. 1991 Mar;143(3):469-75
pubmed: 2001053
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017 Jun 1;195(11):1477-1485
pubmed: 27768396
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1995 Jul;152(1):129-36
pubmed: 7599811
Respir Care. 2018 Feb;63(2):158-168
pubmed: 29042486
Crit Care. 2016 Oct 27;20(1):346
pubmed: 27784322
Anesthesiology. 1988 Aug;69(2):171-9
pubmed: 3044189
Schweiz Med Wochenschr. 1994 Nov 26;124(47):2139-45
pubmed: 7992029
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1998 Jan;157(1):23-30
pubmed: 9445274
JAMA. 2013 Feb 20;309(7):671-7
pubmed: 23340588
Crit Care. 2005;9(6):607-21
pubmed: 16356246
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2012 Feb 15;185(4):349-50
pubmed: 22336673
J Crit Care. 2022 Feb;67:95-99
pubmed: 34741964
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1997 Mar;155(3):906-15
pubmed: 9117025
JAMA. 2021 Mar 23;325(12):1173-1184
pubmed: 33755077