Stratification of responses to tDCS intervention in a healthy pediatric population based on resting-state EEG profiles.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
25 05 2023
25 05 2023
Historique:
received:
03
01
2023
accepted:
06
05
2023
medline:
29
5
2023
pubmed:
26
5
2023
entrez:
25
5
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) is a non-invasive neuromodulation technique with a wide variety of clinical and research applications. As increasingly acknowledged, its effectiveness is subject dependent, which may lead to time consuming and cost ineffective treatment development phases. We propose the combination of electroencephalography (EEG) and unsupervised learning for the stratification and prediction of individual responses to tDCS. A randomized, sham-controlled, double-blind crossover study design was conducted within a clinical trial for the development of pediatric treatments based on tDCS. The tDCS stimulation (sham and active) was applied either in the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex or in the right inferior frontal gyrus. Following the stimulation session, participants performed 3 cognitive tasks to assess the response to the intervention: the Flanker Task, N-Back Task and Continuous Performance Test (CPT). We used data from 56 healthy children and adolescents to implement an unsupervised clustering approach that stratify participants based on their resting-state EEG spectral features before the tDCS intervention. We then applied a correlational analysis to characterize the clusters of EEG profiles in terms of participant's difference in the behavioral outcome (accuracy and response time) of the cognitive tasks when performed after a tDCS-sham or a tDCS-active session. Better behavioral performance following the active tDCS session compared to the sham tDCS session is considered a positive intervention response, whilst the reverse is considered a negative one. Optimal results in terms of validity measures was obtained for 4 clusters. These results show that specific EEG-based digital phenotypes can be associated to particular responses. While one cluster presents neurotypical EEG activity, the remaining clusters present non-typical EEG characteristics, which seem to be associated with a positive response. Findings suggest that unsupervised machine learning can be successfully used to stratify and eventually predict responses of individuals to a tDCS treatment.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37231030
doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-34724-5
pii: 10.1038/s41598-023-34724-5
pmc: PMC10213038
doi:
Types de publication
Randomized Controlled Trial
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
8438Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
Neuroscience. 2020 Sep 1;443:120-130
pubmed: 32730948
Sci Rep. 2021 Nov 2;11(1):21512
pubmed: 34728684
Genome Biol. 2019 Jun 4;20(1):118
pubmed: 31164141
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1986 Nov;12(4):476-83
pubmed: 2946804
CNS Drugs. 2008;22(3):213-37
pubmed: 18278977
J Intern Med. 2013 Oct;274(4):308-20
pubmed: 23865950
Neuroimage. 2021 May 1;231:117823
pubmed: 33549760
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2013 May;21(3):333-45
pubmed: 22949089
Transl Psychiatry. 2017 Mar 7;7(3):e1053
pubmed: 28267146
Elife. 2021 Mar 23;10:
pubmed: 33755019
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2002 Mar;26(2):105-25
pubmed: 11856556
Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2013 Oct;16(9):1927-36
pubmed: 23719048
Neuroimage Clin. 2020;28:102399
pubmed: 32891892
Sci Rep. 2017 Apr 21;7(1):876
pubmed: 28432349
Clin Neurophysiol. 2021 Feb;132(2):643-649
pubmed: 33243617
PLoS Comput Biol. 2019 Jun 20;15(6):e1006907
pubmed: 31220072
Neurosci Lett. 2016 Aug 26;629:105-109
pubmed: 27369325
Clin Neurophysiol. 2007 Jul;118(7):1472-9
pubmed: 17502165
PLoS One. 2019 Apr 12;14(4):e0215095
pubmed: 30978259
Cortex. 2019 Apr;113:37-57
pubmed: 30597311
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2021 Sep;128:789-818
pubmed: 33549739
Nat Biotechnol. 2020 Apr;38(4):439-447
pubmed: 32042166
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Apr 1;4(4):e215335
pubmed: 33843998
Nature. 2022 Sep;609(7925):109-118
pubmed: 36002572
Brain Stimul. 2020 Nov - Dec;13(6):1753-1764
pubmed: 33049412
Clin Neurophysiol. 2017 Sep;128(9):1774-1809
pubmed: 28709880
Trends Cogn Sci. 2008 Dec;12(12):447-54
pubmed: 18951833
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2011 Feb;37(1):137-51
pubmed: 20731517
J Exp Psychol. 1958 Apr;55(4):352-8
pubmed: 13539317
Psychiatry Res. 2012 Aug 15;198(3):482-8
pubmed: 22425468
J Biomed Inform. 2018 Sep;85:30-39
pubmed: 30016722
Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2014 Oct;16(10):479
pubmed: 25135779
Paediatr Child Health. 2015 May;20(4):200-2
pubmed: 26038639
J Consult Psychol. 1956 Oct;20(5):343-50
pubmed: 13367264
Brain Behav. 2015 Apr;5(4):e00330
pubmed: 25798338
Dev Neuropsychol. 2012;37(3):253-73
pubmed: 22545661
Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 2015;55:15-34
pubmed: 25423479
Clin Neurophysiol. 2017 Jan;128(1):56-92
pubmed: 27866120
Sci Rep. 2019 Jan 24;9(1):690
pubmed: 30679616
Front Hum Neurosci. 2016 Dec 21;10:643
pubmed: 28066214
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2019 Aug;44(9):1613-1622
pubmed: 31039579
J Affect Disord. 2020 Mar 15;265:460-467
pubmed: 32090773
Psychophysiology. 2015 Oct;52(10):1293-304
pubmed: 26238380
Clin Neurophysiol. 2019 Aug;130(8):1342-1350
pubmed: 31200241
Trends Cogn Sci. 2014 Apr;18(4):177-85
pubmed: 24440116