Memory and creativity: A meta-analytic examination of the relationship between memory systems and creative cognition.

Convergent thinking Creative cognition Divergent thinking Semantic memory Working memory

Journal

Psychonomic bulletin & review
ISSN: 1531-5320
Titre abrégé: Psychon Bull Rev
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9502924

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
25 May 2023
Historique:
accepted: 30 04 2023
medline: 26 5 2023
pubmed: 26 5 2023
entrez: 25 5 2023
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Increasing evidence suggests that specific memory systems (e.g., semantic vs. episodic) may support specific creative thought processes. However, there are a number of inconsistencies in the literature regarding the strength, direction, and influence of different memory (semantic, episodic, working, and short-term) and creativity (divergent and convergent thinking) types, as well as the influence of external factors (age, stimuli modality) on this purported relationship. In this meta-analysis, we examined 525 correlations from 79 published studies and unpublished datasets, representing data from 12,846 individual participants. We found a small but significant (r = .19) correlation between memory and creative cognition. Among semantic, episodic, working, and short-term memory, all correlations were significant, but semantic memory - particularly verbal fluency, the ability to strategically retrieve information from long-term memory - was found to drive this relationship. Further, working memory capacity was found to be more strongly related to convergent than divergent creative thinking. We also found that within visual creativity, the relationship with visual memory was greater than that of verbal memory, but within verbal creativity, the relationship with verbal memory was greater than that of visual memory. Finally, the memory-creativity correlation was larger for children compared to young adults despite no impact of age on the overall effect size. These results yield three key conclusions: (1) semantic memory supports both verbal and nonverbal creative thinking, (2) working memory supports convergent creative thinking, and (3) the cognitive control of memory is central to performance on creative thinking tasks.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37231179
doi: 10.3758/s13423-023-02303-4
pii: 10.3758/s13423-023-02303-4
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Subventions

Organisme : National Science Foundation
ID : 2000047 BSC
Organisme : National Science Foundation
ID : DRL-1920653

Informations de copyright

© 2023. The Psychonomic Society, Inc.

Auteurs

Courtney R Gerver (CR)

Department of Psychology, Pennsylvania State University, 140 Moore Building, University Park, PA, 16802, USA.

Jason W Griffin (JW)

Department of Psychology, Pennsylvania State University, 140 Moore Building, University Park, PA, 16802, USA.

Nancy A Dennis (NA)

Department of Psychology, Pennsylvania State University, 140 Moore Building, University Park, PA, 16802, USA.

Roger E Beaty (RE)

Department of Psychology, Pennsylvania State University, 140 Moore Building, University Park, PA, 16802, USA. rebeaty@psu.edu.

Classifications MeSH