Clinical and biomechanical outcomes following patellar tendon repair with suture tape augmentation.
Acute
Ball sports
Chronic
Internal brace
Quadriceps
Return to sports
Sports Injury
Winter sports
Journal
European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie
ISSN: 1432-1068
Titre abrégé: Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol
Pays: France
ID NLM: 9518037
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2023
Dec 2023
Historique:
received:
26
02
2023
accepted:
05
05
2023
medline:
16
11
2023
pubmed:
26
5
2023
entrez:
26
5
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Patellar tendon ruptures (PTR) occur predominantly in middle-aged patients following indirect trauma. The aim of this study was to quantify the short-term results using a suture tape augmentation technique for the repair of PTR. All consecutive patients with acute (< 6 weeks) PTR who underwent suture tape augmentation between 03/2014 and 11/2019 at a single institution with a minimum follow-up of 12 months were retrospectively evaluated. Outcome measures included Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain, Tegner Activity Scale (TAS) and return to sport rates, Lysholm score, International Knee Documentation Committee subjective knee form (IKDC) as well as Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS). Additionally, a standardized clinical examination and an isometric strength evaluation of knee extension and flexion were performed. It was hypothesized that high return to sport rates and good functional outcome would be observed and that the majority of patients would not present with a severe (> 20%) knee extension strength deficit when compared to the contralateral side. A total of 7 patients (mean age 37.0 ± SD 13.5 years; 6 male/1 female) were available for final assessment at a median follow-up of 17.0 (25-75% IQR 16.0-77.0) months. Three injuries occurred during ball sports, two injuries occurred during winter sports, and one injury each occurred during a motorcycling and skateboarding accident. The average time between trauma and surgery was 4.7 ± 2.6 days. At follow-up, patients reported little pain (VAS: 0 [0-0.4]). Return to sport was possible for all patients 8.9 ± 4.0 months postoperatively at a high level (TAS: 7.0 [6.0-7.0]). Five patients (71.4%) returned to the preinjury level of play, and 2 (28.6%) did not return to the preinjury level of play. Patient-reported outcome measures were moderate to good (Lysholm score: 80.4 ± 14.5; IKDC: 84.2 ± 10.6; KOOS subscales: pain 95.6 ± 6.0, symptoms 81.1 [64.9-89.1], activities of daily living 98.5 [94.1-100], sport and recreation function 82.9 ± 14.1 and knee-related quality of life 75.9 ± 16.3). All patients were very satisfied (57.1%) or satisfied (42.9%) with the postoperative result. No postoperative complications were reported. Strength measurements revealed a severe knee extension deficit in 3 patients (42.9%), but no significant deficit of isometric knee extension or flexion strength in comparison with the contralateral side was observed overall (p > 0.05). Suture tape augmentation in acute PTR repair leads to good functional outcome without major complications. Although a severe knee extension strength deficit may occur in some patients postoperatively, an excellent return to sports rate and high patient satisfaction can be expected nonetheless. Retrospective cohort study; III.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37233797
doi: 10.1007/s00590-023-03572-4
pii: 10.1007/s00590-023-03572-4
pmc: PMC10651537
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
3569-3576Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2022 Sep;142(9):2263-2270
pubmed: 34664130
J Exp Orthop. 2017 Dec;4(1):9
pubmed: 28332149
Am J Sports Med. 2020 Sep;48(11):2686-2691
pubmed: 32757970
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2020 May;106(3):503-507
pubmed: 32179020
Orthop J Sports Med. 2016 Dec 21;4(12):2325967116676078
pubmed: 28210647
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2001 Nov;121(10):578-82
pubmed: 11768640
Am J Sports Med. 2018 Feb;46(2):470-477
pubmed: 29068725
Injury. 2008 Dec;39(12):1338-44
pubmed: 19036362
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2023 May;33(4):869-875
pubmed: 35137251
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013 Apr;21(4):869-79
pubmed: 22581194
J Exp Orthop. 2021 Apr 15;8(1):28
pubmed: 33860391
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2022 Dec;142(12):3837-3844
pubmed: 34988672
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Dec;474(12):2611-2618
pubmed: 27492687
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021 Aug;29(8):2695-2700
pubmed: 33760963
Eur Radiol Exp. 2019 Nov 20;3(1):45
pubmed: 31748839
Orthop J Sports Med. 2021 Jul 27;9(7):23259671211014230
pubmed: 34377711
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019 Oct;27(10):3269-3275
pubmed: 30762088
Am J Sports Med. 2018 Apr;46(5):1199-1204
pubmed: 29401403
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2015 May;101(3):307-11
pubmed: 25771528
Am J Sports Med. 2002 Jul-Aug;30(4):469-73
pubmed: 12130398
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2021 Mar 1;29(5):e251-e257
pubmed: 32590411
Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2020 Oct 24;2(5):e469-e473
pubmed: 33134982
Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2019 Feb;31(1):45-55
pubmed: 30683978
Int Orthop. 2016 Aug;40(8):1717-1723
pubmed: 26432575
PLoS One. 2018 Mar 19;13(3):e0194376
pubmed: 29554109
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2020 Feb;28(2):369-380
pubmed: 31230125
J Knee Surg. 2020 Aug;33(8):804-809
pubmed: 31067585
Bone Joint J. 2021 Oct;103-B(10):1619-1626
pubmed: 34587809
Arthroscopy. 2022 Feb;38(2):597-608
pubmed: 34252562
Phys Ther Sport. 2010 Feb;11(1):12-7
pubmed: 20129118
Am J Sports Med. 2008 Feb;36(2):316-23
pubmed: 17932403
Foot (Edinb). 2022 Mar;50:101865
pubmed: 35248918
Knee. 2015 Jun;22(3):148-55
pubmed: 25819155