Anticipatory prescribing in community end-of-life care: systematic review and narrative synthesis of the evidence since 2017.

clinical decisions drug administration home care pain symptoms and symptom management terminal care

Journal

BMJ supportive & palliative care
ISSN: 2045-4368
Titre abrégé: BMJ Support Palliat Care
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101565123

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
26 May 2023
Historique:
received: 11 11 2022
accepted: 15 04 2023
medline: 27 5 2023
pubmed: 27 5 2023
entrez: 26 5 2023
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

The anticipatory prescribing of injectable medications is recommended practice in controlling distressing symptoms in the last days of life. A 2017 systematic review found practice and guidance was based on inadequate evidence. Since then, there has been considerable additional research, warranting a new review. To review the evidence published since 2017 concerning anticipatory prescribing of injectable medications for adults at the end-of-life in the community, to inform practice and guidance. Systematic review and narrative synthesis. Nine literature databases were searched from May 2017 to March 2022, alongside reference, citation and journal hand-searches. Gough's Weight of Evidence framework was used to appraise included studies. Twenty-eight papers were included in the synthesis. Evidence published since 2017 shows that standardised prescribing of four medications for anticipated symptoms is commonplace in the UK; evidence of practices in other countries is limited. There is limited data on how often medications are administered in the community. Prescriptions are 'accepted' by family caregivers despite inadequate explanations and they generally appreciate having access to medications. Robust evidence of the clinical and cost-effectiveness of anticipatory prescribing remains absent. The evidence underpinning anticipatory prescribing practice and policy remains based primarily on healthcare professionals' perceptions that the intervention is reassuring, provides effective, timely symptom relief in the community and prevents crisis hospital admissions. There is still inadequate evidence regarding optimal medications and dose ranges, and the effectiveness of these prescriptions. Patient and family caregiver experiences of anticipatory prescriptions warrant urgent investigation. CRD42016052108.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
The anticipatory prescribing of injectable medications is recommended practice in controlling distressing symptoms in the last days of life. A 2017 systematic review found practice and guidance was based on inadequate evidence. Since then, there has been considerable additional research, warranting a new review.
AIM OBJECTIVE
To review the evidence published since 2017 concerning anticipatory prescribing of injectable medications for adults at the end-of-life in the community, to inform practice and guidance.
DESIGN METHODS
Systematic review and narrative synthesis.
METHODS METHODS
Nine literature databases were searched from May 2017 to March 2022, alongside reference, citation and journal hand-searches. Gough's Weight of Evidence framework was used to appraise included studies.
RESULTS RESULTS
Twenty-eight papers were included in the synthesis. Evidence published since 2017 shows that standardised prescribing of four medications for anticipated symptoms is commonplace in the UK; evidence of practices in other countries is limited. There is limited data on how often medications are administered in the community. Prescriptions are 'accepted' by family caregivers despite inadequate explanations and they generally appreciate having access to medications. Robust evidence of the clinical and cost-effectiveness of anticipatory prescribing remains absent.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
The evidence underpinning anticipatory prescribing practice and policy remains based primarily on healthcare professionals' perceptions that the intervention is reassuring, provides effective, timely symptom relief in the community and prevents crisis hospital admissions. There is still inadequate evidence regarding optimal medications and dose ranges, and the effectiveness of these prescriptions. Patient and family caregiver experiences of anticipatory prescriptions warrant urgent investigation.
PROSPERO REGISTRATION UNASSIGNED
CRD42016052108.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37236648
pii: spcare-2022-004080
doi: 10.1136/spcare-2022-004080
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Competing interests: None declared.

Auteurs

Ben Bowers (B)

Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, UK bb527@medschl.cam.ac.uk.
Queen's Nursing Institute, London, UK.

Bárbara Costa Pereira Antunes (BCP)

Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, UK.

Simon Etkind (S)

Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, UK.

Sarah A Hopkins (SA)

Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, UK.

Isaac Winterburn (I)

Department of Psychiatry, Cambridge University, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, UK.

Isla Kuhn (I)

School of Clinical Medicine, Cambridge University, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, UK.

Kristian Pollock (K)

School of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.

Stephen Barclay (S)

Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, UK.

Classifications MeSH