Evaluation of motion artefact reduction depending on the artefacts' directions in head MRI using conditional generative adversarial networks.


Journal

Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
26 05 2023
Historique:
received: 10 09 2022
accepted: 24 05 2023
medline: 29 5 2023
pubmed: 27 5 2023
entrez: 26 5 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Motion artefacts caused by the patient's body movements affect magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) accuracy. This study aimed to compare and evaluate the accuracy of motion artefacts correction using a conditional generative adversarial network (CGAN) with an autoencoder and U-net models. The training dataset consisted of motion artefacts generated through simulations. Motion artefacts occur in the phase encoding direction, which is set to either the horizontal or vertical direction of the image. To create T2-weighted axial images with simulated motion artefacts, 5500 head images were used in each direction. Of these data, 90% were used for training, while the remainder were used for the evaluation of image quality. Moreover, the validation data used in the model training consisted of 10% of the training dataset. The training data were divided into horizontal and vertical directions of motion artefact appearance, and the effect of combining this data with the training dataset was verified. The resulting corrected images were evaluated using structural image similarity (SSIM) and peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR), and the metrics were compared with the images without motion artefacts. The best improvements in the SSIM and PSNR were observed in the consistent condition in the direction of the occurrence of motion artefacts in the training and evaluation datasets. However, SSIM > 0.9 and PSNR > 29 dB were accomplished for the learning model with both image directions. The latter model exhibited the highest robustness for actual patient motion in head MRI images. Moreover, the image quality of the corrected image with the CGAN was the closest to that of the original image, while the improvement rates for SSIM and PSNR were approximately 26% and 7.7%, respectively. The CGAN model demonstrated a high image reproducibility, and the most significant model was the consistent condition of the learning model and the direction of the appearance of motion artefacts.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37237139
doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-35794-1
pii: 10.1038/s41598-023-35794-1
pmc: PMC10220077
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

8526

Informations de copyright

© 2023. The Author(s).

Références

Neuroimage. 2021 Apr 15;230:117756
pubmed: 33460797
Med Phys. 2021 Jun;48(6):2973-2990
pubmed: 33890681
Sci Rep. 2020 Mar 16;10(1):4786
pubmed: 32179823
Neuroimage. 2022 Apr 1;249:118830
pubmed: 34965454
Magn Reson Med. 2019 Sep;82(3):901-910
pubmed: 31006909
Med Phys. 2019 Sep;46(9):3998-4009
pubmed: 31206709
Radiology. 2020 Jun;295(3):552-561
pubmed: 32286192
Med Phys. 2018 Dec;45(12):5659-5665
pubmed: 30341917
Phys Med Biol. 2016 Mar 7;61(5):R32-56
pubmed: 26864183
PLoS One. 2015 Jul 30;10(7):e0133921
pubmed: 26226146
Neuroimage. 2018 Apr 15;170:456-470
pubmed: 28450139
Eur Radiol. 2020 Nov;30(11):5923-5932
pubmed: 32556463
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi. 2021;77(5):463-470
pubmed: 34011789
Magn Reson Med. 2019 Oct;82(4):1527-1540
pubmed: 31081955
Med Phys. 2019 Sep;46(9):3906-3923
pubmed: 31306488
Technol Health Care. 1997 Dec;5(6):419-35
pubmed: 9696161
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2019 Jan;38(1):167-179
pubmed: 30040634
IEEE Trans Image Process. 2016 May;25(5):2117-29
pubmed: 26978824
J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2017 Jul;4(3):035501
pubmed: 28924574
Magn Reson Med. 2016 Apr;75(4):1484-98
pubmed: 25996443
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2021 Dec;40(12):3686-3697
pubmed: 34242163
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2015 Oct;42(4):887-901
pubmed: 25630632
Magn Reson Med. 2020 Feb;83(2):427-437
pubmed: 31400036
Top Magn Reson Imaging. 2004 Aug;15(4):267-75
pubmed: 15548957

Auteurs

Keisuke Usui (K)

Department of Radiological Technology, Faculty of Health Science, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan. k-usui@juntendo.ac.jp.

Isao Muro (I)

Department of Radiological Technology, Faculty of Health Science, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan.

Syuhei Shibukawa (S)

Department of Radiological Technology, Faculty of Health Science, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan.

Masami Goto (M)

Department of Radiological Technology, Faculty of Health Science, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan.

Koichi Ogawa (K)

Faculty of Science and Engineering, Hosei University, Tokyo, Japan.

Yasuaki Sakano (Y)

Department of Radiological Technology, Faculty of Health Science, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan.

Shinsuke Kyogoku (S)

Department of Radiological Technology, Faculty of Health Science, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan.

Hiroyuki Daida (H)

Department of Radiological Technology, Faculty of Health Science, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH