Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Mental Well-Being Using Health Behavior Data from University Students.
Asian population
algorithms
health behaviors
machine learning
mental well-being
university students
Journal
Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 2306-5354
Titre abrégé: Bioengineering (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101676056
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 May 2023
10 May 2023
Historique:
received:
20
04
2023
revised:
27
04
2023
accepted:
29
04
2023
medline:
27
5
2023
pubmed:
27
5
2023
entrez:
27
5
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic in early 2020, the importance of timely and effective assessment of mental well-being has increased dramatically. Machine learning (ML) algorithms and artificial intelligence (AI) techniques can be harnessed for early detection, prognostication and prediction of negative psychological well-being states. We used data from a large, multi-site cross-sectional survey consisting of 17 universities in Southeast Asia. This research work models mental well-being and reports on the performance of various machine learning algorithms, including generalized linear models, k-nearest neighbor, naïve Bayes, neural networks, random forest, recursive partitioning, bagging, and boosting. Random Forest and adaptive boosting algorithms achieved the highest accuracy for identifying negative mental well-being traits. The top five most salient features associated with predicting poor mental well-being include the number of sports activities per week, body mass index, grade point average (GPA), sedentary hours, and age. Based on the reported results, several specific recommendations and suggested future work are discussed. These findings may be useful to provide cost-effective support and modernize mental well-being assessment and monitoring at the individual and university level.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic in early 2020, the importance of timely and effective assessment of mental well-being has increased dramatically. Machine learning (ML) algorithms and artificial intelligence (AI) techniques can be harnessed for early detection, prognostication and prediction of negative psychological well-being states.
METHODS
METHODS
We used data from a large, multi-site cross-sectional survey consisting of 17 universities in Southeast Asia. This research work models mental well-being and reports on the performance of various machine learning algorithms, including generalized linear models, k-nearest neighbor, naïve Bayes, neural networks, random forest, recursive partitioning, bagging, and boosting.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Random Forest and adaptive boosting algorithms achieved the highest accuracy for identifying negative mental well-being traits. The top five most salient features associated with predicting poor mental well-being include the number of sports activities per week, body mass index, grade point average (GPA), sedentary hours, and age.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Based on the reported results, several specific recommendations and suggested future work are discussed. These findings may be useful to provide cost-effective support and modernize mental well-being assessment and monitoring at the individual and university level.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37237644
pii: bioengineering10050575
doi: 10.3390/bioengineering10050575
pmc: PMC10215693
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Subventions
Organisme : NCATS NIH HHS
ID : UM1 TR004404
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : R01 CA233487
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIMH NIH HHS
ID : R01 MH126137
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCATS NIH HHS
ID : UL1 TR002240
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIGMS NIH HHS
ID : T32 GM141746
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIMH NIH HHS
ID : R01 MH121079
Pays : United States
Commentaires et corrections
Type : UpdateOf
Références
Ann Transl Med. 2016 Jan;4(2):30
pubmed: 26889483
Psychol Med. 2019 Jul;49(9):1426-1448
pubmed: 30744717
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jun 22;18(13):
pubmed: 34206579
Nat Hum Behav. 2021 May;5(5):631-652
pubmed: 33875837
Annu Rev Public Health. 2013;34:119-38
pubmed: 23514317
Am J Public Health. 2010 Dec;100(12):2366-71
pubmed: 20966364
Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2016 Jun;18(2):163-9
pubmed: 27489456
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 12;19(14):
pubmed: 35886375
BMJ. 2019 Jan 28;364:l295
pubmed: 30692081
BMC Psychiatry. 2016 May 28;16:171
pubmed: 27236478
J Med Syst. 2018 Apr 3;42(5):88
pubmed: 29610979
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Mar 18;8(3):e17046
pubmed: 32186518
BMC Psychiatry. 2020 Aug 26;20(1):422
pubmed: 32847539
Brain Inform. 2021 Feb 15;8(1):2
pubmed: 33590388
Healthcare (Basel). 2020 Sep 12;8(3):
pubmed: 32932613