Inter-Rater Reliability of Scoring Systems for Abomasal Lesions in Quebec Veal Calves.
abomasal lesions
reliability
scoring system
veal calves
Journal
Animals : an open access journal from MDPI
ISSN: 2076-2615
Titre abrégé: Animals (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101635614
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
17 May 2023
17 May 2023
Historique:
received:
04
04
2023
revised:
12
05
2023
accepted:
15
05
2023
medline:
27
5
2023
pubmed:
27
5
2023
entrez:
27
5
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The objective of this study was to determine the inter-rater reliability of current scoring systems used to detect abomasal lesions in veal calves. In addition, macroscopic lesions were compared with corresponding histological lesions. For this, 76 abomasa were retrieved from veal calves in a slaughterhouse in Quebec and scored by four independent raters using current scoring systems. The localisations of the lesions were separated into pyloric, fundic, or torus pyloricus areas. Lesions were classified into three different types, i.e., erosions, ulcers, and scars. To estimate the inter-rater reliability, the coefficient type 1 of Gwet's agreement and Fleiss
Identifiants
pubmed: 37238094
pii: ani13101664
doi: 10.3390/ani13101664
pmc: PMC10215123
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Subventions
Organisme : Sector Development Program (SDP) of the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (MAPAQ)
Organisme : transition program for the milk-fed veal calves sector (Programme de transition pour le secteur veau de lait) of the financial agriculture of Quebec (Financière Agricole du Québec).
Références
Vet J. 2011 May;188(2):166-70
pubmed: 20570535
J Anim Sci. 2002 Feb;80(2):367-75
pubmed: 11881926
Tijdschr Diergeneeskd. 1985 Oct 1;110(19):755-61
pubmed: 4071512
J Dairy Sci. 2011 Feb;94(2):853-63
pubmed: 21257054
J Dairy Sci. 2019 Feb;102(2):943-960
pubmed: 30591333
N Z Vet J. 2016 Jul;64(4):243-7
pubmed: 26878417
J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Jan;64(1):96-106
pubmed: 21130355
J Vet Intern Med. 2021 Jan;35(1):571-579
pubmed: 33284465
Aust Vet J. 2007 Sep;85(9):356-61
pubmed: 17760937
J Dairy Sci. 2014 Oct;97(10):6475-84
pubmed: 25129492
J Chiropr Med. 2016 Jun;15(2):155-63
pubmed: 27330520
PeerJ. 2014 Nov 11;2:e651
pubmed: 25401054
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013 Apr 29;13:61
pubmed: 23627889
Acta Vet Scand. 2018 Apr 13;60(1):24
pubmed: 29653546
Vet Rec. 2013 Mar 9;172(10):269
pubmed: 23349249
J Anim Sci. 2012 Oct;90(10):3538-46
pubmed: 22585794
Equine Vet J. 2021 May;53(3):495-502
pubmed: 32808328
Psychol Bull. 1979 Mar;86(2):420-8
pubmed: 18839484
Res Vet Sci. 2010 Apr;88(2):352-60
pubmed: 19793601
Animals (Basel). 2020 Dec 09;10(12):
pubmed: 33317186
Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract. 2009 Mar;25(1):209-20, viii
pubmed: 19174290
Zentralbl Veterinarmed A. 1991 Jun;38(5):357-66
pubmed: 1910238
Vet Rec. 1987 Dec 19-26;121(25-26):586-90
pubmed: 3438993
J Clin Epidemiol. 2018 Jun;98:89-97
pubmed: 29522827
Can Vet J. 1996 Jan;37(1):23-6
pubmed: 8746415
BMC Vet Res. 2012 Mar 14;8:26
pubmed: 22414223
Res Vet Sci. 2012 Feb;92(1):162-8
pubmed: 21094507
J Dairy Sci. 2013;96(12):7765-76
pubmed: 24094537
Tierarztl Prax Ausg G Grosstiere Nutztiere. 2016 Oct 12;44(5):279-285
pubmed: 27272498