Cervical Cancer Detection Techniques: A Chronological Review.

CAD cervix review tumor

Journal

Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 2075-4418
Titre abrégé: Diagnostics (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101658402

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
17 May 2023
Historique:
received: 03 05 2023
revised: 12 05 2023
accepted: 15 05 2023
medline: 27 5 2023
pubmed: 27 5 2023
entrez: 27 5 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Cervical cancer is known as a major health problem globally, with high mortality as well as incidence rates. Over the years, there have been significant advancements in cervical cancer detection techniques, leading to improved accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity. This article provides a chronological review of cervical cancer detection techniques, from the traditional Pap smear test to the latest computer-aided detection (CAD) systems. The traditional method for cervical cancer screening is the Pap smear test. It consists of examining cervical cells under a microscope for abnormalities. However, this method is subjective and may miss precancerous lesions, leading to false negatives and a delayed diagnosis. Therefore, a growing interest has been in shown developing CAD methods to enhance cervical cancer screening. However, the effectiveness and reliability of CAD systems are still being evaluated. A systematic review of the literature was performed using the Scopus database to identify relevant studies on cervical cancer detection techniques published between 1996 and 2022. The search terms used included "(cervix OR cervical) AND (cancer OR tumor) AND (detect* OR diagnosis)". Studies were included if they reported on the development or evaluation of cervical cancer detection techniques, including traditional methods and CAD systems. The results of the review showed that CAD technology for cervical cancer detection has come a long way since it was introduced in the 1990s. Early CAD systems utilized image processing and pattern recognition techniques to analyze digital images of cervical cells, with limited success due to low sensitivity and specificity. In the early 2000s, machine learning (ML) algorithms were introduced to the CAD field for cervical cancer detection, allowing for more accurate and automated analysis of digital images of cervical cells. ML-based CAD systems have shown promise in several studies, with improved sensitivity and specificity reported compared to traditional screening methods. In summary, this chronological review of cervical cancer detection techniques highlights the significant advancements made in this field over the past few decades. ML-based CAD systems have shown promise for improving the accuracy and sensitivity of cervical cancer detection. The Hybrid Intelligent System for Cervical Cancer Diagnosis (HISCCD) and the Automated Cervical Screening System (ACSS) are two of the most promising CAD systems. Still, deeper validation and research are required before being broadly accepted. Continued innovation and collaboration in this field may help enhance cervical cancer detection as well as ultimately reduce the disease's burden on women worldwide.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37238248
pii: diagnostics13101763
doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13101763
pmc: PMC10217496
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Références

J Med Syst. 2019 Aug 1;43(9):301
pubmed: 31372766
Int J Cancer. 2004 Aug 20;111(2):278-85
pubmed: 15197783
Am J Nurs. 2019 Jul;119(7):53-54
pubmed: 31232777
J Nanobiotechnology. 2020 Jan 13;18(1):11
pubmed: 31931815
Artif Intell Med. 1996 Feb;8(1):67-90
pubmed: 8963382
Comput Med Imaging Graph. 2022 Apr;97:102052
pubmed: 35299096
Comput Biol Med. 2022 May;144:105392
pubmed: 35299043
J Electr Bioimpedance. 2021 Dec 27;12(1):153-162
pubmed: 35069951
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2020 Nov;39(11):3403-3415
pubmed: 32406830
Biomed Eng Online. 2019 Feb 12;18(1):16
pubmed: 30755214
Ann Biomed Eng. 2012 May;40(5):1192-204
pubmed: 22215277
PeerJ Comput Sci. 2021 Feb 18;7:e348
pubmed: 33816998
Crit Rev Biomed Eng. 2018;46(2):135-145
pubmed: 30055530
Med Image Anal. 2021 Oct;73:102197
pubmed: 34403932
J Biomed Opt. 2014 May;19(5):057011
pubmed: 24853147
Comput Biol Med. 2021 Dec;139:104985
pubmed: 34735942
J Nanosci Nanotechnol. 2015 Sep;15(9):6423-8
pubmed: 26716195
CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 May;71(3):209-249
pubmed: 33538338
Biomed Phys Eng Express. 2020 Feb 18;6(2):025011
pubmed: 33438637
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2019 Aug;66(8):2306-2318
pubmed: 30575526
J Biomed Opt. 2010 Mar-Apr;15(2):026001
pubmed: 20459246
Sensors (Basel). 2017 Dec 19;17(12):
pubmed: 29257043
Sensors (Basel). 2020 May 15;20(10):
pubmed: 32429090
J Med Syst. 2019 Jun 27;43(8):250
pubmed: 31250121
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2020 Jun 11;8:590
pubmed: 32596230
NPJ Digit Med. 2022 Feb 15;5(1):19
pubmed: 35169217
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2012 Jun;31(6):1213-27
pubmed: 22328178
J Gen Intern Med. 2004 Mar;19(3):243-50
pubmed: 15009779
Biosens Bioelectron. 2015 Aug 15;70:145-52
pubmed: 25801955
Front Public Health. 2021 Dec 23;9:788376
pubmed: 35004588
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2010;11(4):943-51
pubmed: 21133606
J Xray Sci Technol. 2016 Apr 7;24(4):531-6
pubmed: 27061798
Bioconjug Chem. 2018 Nov 21;29(11):3606-3613
pubmed: 30247899
Biosens Bioelectron. 2014 Apr 15;54:634-9
pubmed: 24333936
J Biomed Opt. 2014 Dec;19(12):127003
pubmed: 25504494
Stat Anal Data Min. 2015 Apr;8(2):65-74
pubmed: 26617681
J Biophotonics. 2017 Feb;10(2):242-252
pubmed: 26929106
Int J Mol Sci. 2017 Sep 22;18(10):
pubmed: 28937589
Med Image Anal. 2021 Oct;73:102167
pubmed: 34333217
Nanomedicine. 2015 Oct;11(7):1667-75
pubmed: 25959926
Appl Opt. 2020 Feb 1;59(4):1237-1248
pubmed: 32225267
CA Cancer J Clin. 2023 Jan;73(1):17-48
pubmed: 36633525
Biosens Bioelectron. 2015 Dec 15;74:673-9
pubmed: 26201985
J Biomed Opt. 2008 Nov-Dec;13(6):064016
pubmed: 19123662
J Biophotonics. 2021 Jan;14(1):e202000237
pubmed: 32864849
J Biophotonics. 2018 May;11(5):e201700245
pubmed: 29205885
PeerJ Comput Sci. 2018 May 14;4:e154
pubmed: 33816808
J Biomed Opt. 2012 Sep;17(9):98001-1
pubmed: 23085927

Auteurs

Wan Azani Mustafa (WA)

Faculty of Electrical Engineering Technology, Campus Pauh Putra, Universiti Malaysia Perlis, Arau 02600, Perlis, Malaysia.
Advanced Computing (AdvComp), Centre of Excellence (CoE), Universiti Malaysia Perlis, Arau 02600, Perlis, Malaysia.

Shahrina Ismail (S)

Faculty of Science and Technology, Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia (USIM), Bandar Baru Nilai 71800, Negeri Sembilan, Malaysia.

Fahirah Syaliza Mokhtar (FS)

Faculty of Business, Economy and Social Development, Universiti Malaysia Terengganu, Kuala Nerus 21300, Terengganu, Malaysia.

Hiam Alquran (H)

Department of Biomedical Systems and Informatics Engineering, Yarmouk University, 556, Irbid 21163, Jordan.

Yazan Al-Issa (Y)

Department of Computer Engineering, Yarmouk University, Irbid 22110, Jordan.

Classifications MeSH