Local Treatment of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Is Mastectomy Superior to Breast-Conserving Surgery?
breast-conserving surgery
mastectomy
triple-negative breast cancer
Journal
Journal of personalized medicine
ISSN: 2075-4426
Titre abrégé: J Pers Med
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101602269
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
21 May 2023
21 May 2023
Historique:
received:
01
04
2023
revised:
17
05
2023
accepted:
19
05
2023
medline:
27
5
2023
pubmed:
27
5
2023
entrez:
27
5
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive type of breast cancer that lacks the expression of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2). TNBC accounts for about 15% of breast cancers and has a poorer prognosis as compared with other subtypes of breast cancer. The more rapid onset of this cancer and its aggressiveness have often convinced breast surgeons that mastectomy could provide better oncological results. However, there is no relevant clinical trial that has assessed differences between breast-conserving surgery (BCS) and mastectomy (M) in these patients. This population-based study aimed to investigate the distinct outcomes between conservative treatment and M in a case series of 289 patients with TNBC treated over a 9-year period. This monocentric study retrospectively evaluated patients with TNBC who underwent upfront surgery at Fondazione Policlinico Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, in Rome, between 1 January 2013 and 31 December 2021. First, the patients were divided in two groups according to the surgical treatment received: BCS vs. M. Then, the patients were stratified into four risk subclasses based on combined T and N pathological staging (T1N0, T1N+, T2-4N0 and T2-4N+). The primary endpoint of the study was to evaluate locoregional disease-free survival (LR-DFS), distant disease-free survival (DDFS) and overall survival (OS) in the different subclasses. We analyzed 289 patients that underwent either breast-conserving surgery (247/289, 85.5%) or mastectomy (42/289, 14.5%). After a median follow-up of 43.2 months (49.7, 22.2-74.3), 28 patients (9.6%) developed a locoregional recurrence, 27 patients (9.0%) showed systemic recurrence and 19 patients (6.5%) died. No significant differences due to type of surgical treatment were observed in the different risk subclasses in terms of locoregional disease-free survival, distant disease-free survival and overall survival. With the limits of a retrospective, single-center study, our data seem to indicate similar efficacy in terms of locoregional control, distant metastasis and overall survival with the use of upfront breast-conserving surgery as compared with radical surgery in the treatment of TNBC. Therefore, TNBC should not be considered to be a contraindication for breast conservation.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37241035
pii: jpm13050865
doi: 10.3390/jpm13050865
pmc: PMC10224186
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Références
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2006 Apr 19;98(8):521-9
pubmed: 16622121
JAMA Surg. 2014 Mar;149(3):252-8
pubmed: 24382582
Br J Surg. 2021 Jul 23;108(7):760-768
pubmed: 34057990
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Mar 01;14(5):
pubmed: 35267583
Clin Breast Cancer. 2009 May;9(2):96-100
pubmed: 19433390
Surg Oncol. 2013 Dec;22(4):247-55
pubmed: 24144808
Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2022 Jul 29;27(3):545-551
pubmed: 36186688
Breast J. 2005 Sep-Oct;11(5):355-6
pubmed: 16174159
Ann Ital Chir. 2018;89:290
pubmed: 30352955
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Nov 2;3(11):e2021881
pubmed: 33211105
Ann Surg Oncol. 2011 Oct;18(10):2858-65
pubmed: 21442346
Front Oncol. 2022 Oct 28;12:910765
pubmed: 36387138
Front Oncol. 2022 Jun 24;12:928467
pubmed: 35814467
Minerva Chir. 2007 Aug;62(4):249-55
pubmed: 17641585
Breast. 2022 Apr;62:144-151
pubmed: 35182994
Int J Surg Oncol. 2020 Feb 27;2020:8709231
pubmed: 32181017
Cancer Biol Med. 2015 Jun;12(2):106-16
pubmed: 26175926
Ann Surg Oncol. 2011 Oct;18(11):3164-73
pubmed: 21947595
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2022 Jun;20(6):691-722
pubmed: 35714673
Med Clin North Am. 2017 Nov;101(6):1099-1113
pubmed: 28992857
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Aug 23;14(17):
pubmed: 36077601
Clin Cancer Res. 2007 Aug 1;13(15 Pt 1):4429-34
pubmed: 17671126
Lancet Oncol. 2015 Mar;16(3):e113-22
pubmed: 25752562
Oncotarget. 2017 Jan 17;8(3):4773-4780
pubmed: 27999201
Front Pharmacol. 2018 Aug 21;9:909
pubmed: 30186165
JAMA Surg. 2014 Mar;149(3):267-74
pubmed: 24429935
J Clin Oncol. 2011 Oct 10;29(29):3885-91
pubmed: 21900114
Tumori. 2012 Jan-Feb;98(1):79-85
pubmed: 22495705
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2021 Feb;25(4):1910-1915
pubmed: 33660830
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Sep 21;14(19):
pubmed: 36230495
Front Oncol. 2023 Jan 18;12:1053035
pubmed: 36741700