The impact of electrosurgical devices on electromyography-based neuromuscular monitoring during abdominal laparotomy: a case series.
Electromyography
Electrosurgical device
Neuromuscular monitoring
TetraGraph
Journal
Journal of clinical monitoring and computing
ISSN: 1573-2614
Titre abrégé: J Clin Monit Comput
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 9806357
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 2023
08 2023
Historique:
received:
03
03
2023
accepted:
20
05
2023
medline:
28
7
2023
pubmed:
27
5
2023
entrez:
27
5
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The present study aimed to evaluate the effect of electrosurgical devices on neuromuscular monitoring using an electromyography (EMG)-based neuromuscular monitor during abdominal laparotomy. Seventeen women (aged 32-64 years) undergoing gynecological laparotomy under total intravenous general anesthesia were enrolled in the study. A TetraGraph™ was placed to stimulate the ulnar nerve and to monitor the abductor digiti minimi muscle. After device calibration, train-of-four (TOF) measurements were repeated at intervals of 20 s. Rocuronium 0.6 to 0.9 mg/kg was administered for induction, and additional doses of 0.1 to 0.2 mg/kg were administered to maintain TOF counts ≤ 2 during the surgery. The primary outcome of the study was the ratio of measurement failure. The secondary outcomes of the study were the total number of measurements, the number of measurement failures, and the most extended consecutive number of measurement failures. The data are expressed as median (range). Of the 3091 (1480-8134) measurements, the number of measurement failures was 94 (60-200), resulting in a failure ratio of 3.5% (1.4-6.5%). The most extended consecutive number of measurement failures was 8 (4-13). All attending anesthesiologists were able to maintain and reverse neuromuscular blocks under EMG guidance. This prospective observational study demonstrated that the use of EMG-based neuromuscular monitoring does not seem to be heavily affected by electrical interference during lower abdominal laparotomic surgery. Trial registration This trial was registered in the University Hospital Medical Information Network under registration number UMIN000048138 (registration date; June 23, 2022).
Identifiants
pubmed: 37243953
doi: 10.1007/s10877-023-01039-9
pii: 10.1007/s10877-023-01039-9
doi:
Substances chimiques
Androstanols
0
Types de publication
Observational Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1111-1114Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V.
Références
Iwasaki H, Yamamoto M, Sato H, Doshu-Kajiura A, Kitajima O, Takagi S, Luthe SK, Suzuki T. A comparison between the Adductor Pollicis muscle using TOF-Watch SX and the Abductor Digiti Minimi muscle using TetraGraph in Rocuronium-Induced Neuromuscular Block: a prospective observational study. Anesth Analg. 2022;135(2):370–5. https://doi.org/10.1213/ane.0000000000005897
doi: 10.1213/ane.0000000000005897
pubmed: 35061641
Nemes R, Lengyel S, Nagy G, Hampton DR, Gray M, Renew JR, Tassonyi E, Fülesdi B, Brull SJ. Ipsilateral and simultaneous comparison of responses from Acceleromyography- and Electromyography-based neuromuscular monitors. Anesthesiology. 2021;135(4):597–611. https://doi.org/10.1097/aln.0000000000003896
doi: 10.1097/aln.0000000000003896
pubmed: 34329371
Giudici G, Piccioni F, Proto P, Valenza F. A comparison of accelerometric monitoring by TOF Watch® SX and electromyographic monitoring by Tetragraph® for recovery from neuromuscular blockade. J Clin Anesth. 2021;75:110481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinane.2021.110481
doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2021.110481
pubmed: 34388509
Bowdle A, Michaelsen K. Quantitative twitch monitoring: what works best and how do we know? Anesthesiology. 2021;135(4):558–61. https://doi.org/10.1097/aln.0000000000003950
doi: 10.1097/aln.0000000000003950
pubmed: 34499107
Iwasaki H, Nemes R, Brull SJ, Renew JR. Quantitative neuromuscular monitoring: current Devices, NewTechnological advances, and use in clinical practice. Curr Anesthesiology Rep. 2018;8(2):134–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40140-018-0261-x
doi: 10.1007/s40140-018-0261-x
Sato H, Iwasaki H, Doshu-Kajiura A, Katagiri S, Takagi S, Luthe SK, Suzuki T. Comparison of two electromyography-based neuromuscular monitors, AF-201P and TetraGraph, in rocuronium-induced neuromuscular block: a prospective comparative study. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. 2022;41(6):101145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accpm.2022.101145
doi: 10.1016/j.accpm.2022.101145
pubmed: 36057386