Student perceptions of the use of three-dimensional (3-D) virtual reality (VR) simulation in the delivery of radiation protection training for radiography and medical students.

Radiation protection Radiation safety training Virtual reality simulation

Journal

Radiography (London, England : 1995)
ISSN: 1532-2831
Titre abrégé: Radiography (Lond)
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 9604102

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
07 2023
Historique:
received: 23 03 2023
revised: 08 05 2023
accepted: 11 05 2023
medline: 28 6 2023
pubmed: 28 5 2023
entrez: 27 5 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

VR simulation-based learning is increasingly used in healthcare education to prepare students for clinical practice. This study investigates healthcare students' experience of learning radiation safety in a simulated interventional radiology (IR) suite. Radiography students (n = 35) and medical students (n = 100) were introduced to 3D VR radiation dosimetry software designed to improve the learners' understanding of radiation safety in IR. Radiography students underwent formal VR training and assessment, which was complemented with clinical placement. Medical students practiced similar 3D VR activities informally without assessment. An online questionnaire containing Likert questions and open-ended questions was used to gather student feedback on the perceived value of VR-based radiation safety education. Descriptive statistics and Mann-Whitney U tests were used to analyse Likert-questions. Open-ended question responses were thematically analysed. A survey response rate of 49% (n = 49) and 77% (n = 27) was obtained from radiography and medical students respectively. Most respondents (80%) enjoyed their 3D VR learning experience, favouring the in-person VR experience to online VR. 73% felt that VR learning enhanced their confidence across all relevant learning outcomes. Whilst confidence was enhanced across both cohorts, VR learning had a greater impact on confidence levels amongst medical students with respect to their understanding of radiation safety matters (U = 375.5, p < 0.01). 3D VR was deemed a valuable assessment tool. Radiation dosimetry simulation-based learning in the 3D VR IR suite is perceived to be a valuable pedagogical tool by radiography and medical students and enhances curricula content.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
VR simulation-based learning is increasingly used in healthcare education to prepare students for clinical practice. This study investigates healthcare students' experience of learning radiation safety in a simulated interventional radiology (IR) suite.
METHOD
Radiography students (n = 35) and medical students (n = 100) were introduced to 3D VR radiation dosimetry software designed to improve the learners' understanding of radiation safety in IR. Radiography students underwent formal VR training and assessment, which was complemented with clinical placement. Medical students practiced similar 3D VR activities informally without assessment. An online questionnaire containing Likert questions and open-ended questions was used to gather student feedback on the perceived value of VR-based radiation safety education. Descriptive statistics and Mann-Whitney U tests were used to analyse Likert-questions. Open-ended question responses were thematically analysed.
RESULTS
A survey response rate of 49% (n = 49) and 77% (n = 27) was obtained from radiography and medical students respectively. Most respondents (80%) enjoyed their 3D VR learning experience, favouring the in-person VR experience to online VR. 73% felt that VR learning enhanced their confidence across all relevant learning outcomes. Whilst confidence was enhanced across both cohorts, VR learning had a greater impact on confidence levels amongst medical students with respect to their understanding of radiation safety matters (U = 375.5, p < 0.01). 3D VR was deemed a valuable assessment tool.
CONCLUSION
Radiation dosimetry simulation-based learning in the 3D VR IR suite is perceived to be a valuable pedagogical tool by radiography and medical students and enhances curricula content.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37244141
pii: S1078-8174(23)00115-3
doi: 10.1016/j.radi.2023.05.009
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

777-785

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Conflict of interest statement None.

Auteurs

L Rainford (L)

Radiography and Diagnostic Imaging, School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Ireland. Electronic address: Louise.rainford@ucd.ie.

A Tcacenco (A)

School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Ireland. Electronic address: antonina.tcacenco@ucdconnect.ie.

J Potocnik (J)

Radiography and Diagnostic Imaging, School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Ireland. Electronic address: Jaka.potocnik@ucd.ie.

C Brophy (C)

Radiology Department, Blackrock Clinic, Dublin, Ireland. Electronic address: carmel.harding@blackrock-clinic.com.

A Lunney (A)

Radiography and Diagnostic Imaging, School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Ireland. Electronic address: aine.lunney@ucd.ie.

D Kearney (D)

Radiology Department, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland. Electronic address: dkearney@mater.ie.

M O'Connor (M)

Radiography and Diagnostic Imaging, School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Ireland. Electronic address: michelle.o'connor@ucd.ie.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH