Integration of clinical sequencing and immunohistochemistry for the molecular classification of endometrial carcinoma.
Clinical sequencing
Endometrial carcinoma
Immunohistochemistry
Molecular classification
Mutation
Journal
Gynecologic oncology
ISSN: 1095-6859
Titre abrégé: Gynecol Oncol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0365304
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 2023
07 2023
Historique:
received:
14
04
2023
accepted:
16
05
2023
pmc-release:
01
07
2024
medline:
27
6
2023
pubmed:
29
5
2023
entrez:
28
5
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Using next generation sequencing (NGS), The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) found that endometrial carcinomas (ECs) fall under one of four molecular subtypes, and a POLE mutation status, mismatch repair (MMR) and p53 immunohistochemistry (IHC)-based surrogate has been developed. We sought to retrospectively classify and characterize a large series of unselected ECs that were prospectively subjected to clinical sequencing by utilizing clinical molecular and IHC data. All patients with EC with clinical tumor-normal MSK-IMPACT NGS from 2014 to 2020 (n = 2115) were classified by integrating molecular data (i.e., POLE mutation, TP53 mutation, MSIsensor score) and MMR and p53 IHC results. Survival analysis was performed for primary EC patients with upfront surgery at our institution. Utilizing our integrated approach, significantly more ECs were molecularly classified (1834/2115, 87%) as compared to the surrogate (1387/2115, 66%, p < 0.001), with an almost perfect agreement for classifiable cases (Kappa 0.962, 95% CI 0.949-0.975). Discrepancies were primarily due to TP53 mutations in p53-IHC-normal ECs. Of the 1834 ECs, most were of copy number (CN)-high molecular subtype (40%), followed by CN-low (32%), MSI-high (23%) and POLE (5%). Histologic and genomic variability was present amongst all molecular subtypes. Molecular classification was prognostic in early- and advanced-stage disease, including early-stage endometrioid EC. The integration of clinical NGS and IHC data allows for an algorithmic approach to molecularly classifying newly diagnosed EC, while overcoming issues of IHC-based genetic alteration detection. Such integrated approach will be important moving forward given the prognostic and potentially predictive information afforded by this classification.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37245486
pii: S0090-8258(23)00300-1
doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2023.05.059
pmc: PMC10402916
mid: NIHMS1904688
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Tumor Suppressor Protein p53
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
262-272Subventions
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : P30 CA008748
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Conflicts of interest N.R. Abu-Rustum reports Stryker/Novadaq and GRAIL grants paid to the institution, outside the current study. C.F. Friedman reports institutional research support from Seagen, Merck, BMS, AstraZeneca, Mersana and Hotspot Therapeutics; consulting fees from BMS, Seagen and Aadi Biosciences; honoraria for lectures from Onclive; meeting/ travel support by Puma; participation on Data Safety Monitoring or Advisory Board of Merck, Genentech and Marengo (all uncompensated). D. Zamarin reports institutional research support from AstraZeneca, Merck, Plexxikon Synthekine and Genentech; consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Synthekine, Astellas, Tessa Therapeutics, Memgen, Celldex, Crown Biosciences, Hookipa Biotech, Kalivir, Xencor and GSK; royalties from Merck; and stock options from Accurius Therapeutics, ImmunOS Therapeutics and Calidi Biotherapeutics, all outside the submitted work. V. Makker reports meeting/travel support by Eisai and Merck; participation on Data Safety Monitoring or Advisory Board of Duality, Merck, Karyopharm, Exelexis, Eisai, Karyopharm, BMS, Clovis, Faeth Immunocore, Morphosys, AstraZeneca, Novartis, GSK, Bayer (all unpaid), and study support to the institution by Merck, Eisai, AztraZeneca, Faeth, Karyopharm, Zymeworks, Duality, Clovis, Bayer and Takeda. Y. Liu reports institutional research funding from Repare Therapeutics, AstraZeneca and GSK; honoraria from Total Health and Sarah Lawrence College; and travel/meeting support by AstraZeneca, outside the submitted work. B. Weigelt reports a research grant from REPARE Therapeutics paid to the institution, outside the submitted work. D.S. Chi reports personal fees from Apyx Medical, Verthermia Inc., Biom ‘Up, and AstraZeneca, as well as recent or current stock/options ownership of Apyx Medical, Verthemia, Intuitive Surgical, Inc., TransEnterix, Inc., Doximity, Moderna, and BioNTech SE. E.L. Jewell reports personal fees from Covidien/Medtronic. M. M. Leitao is an ad hoc speaker for Intuitive Surgical, Inc.; outside the submitted work, he is on the Advisory Board of Ethicon/Johnson & Johnson and Takeda; and reports grants paid to the institution by KCI/Acelity. C. Aghajanian reports clinical trial funding paid to the institution from AstraZeneca; consulting fees (advisory board) from Eisai/Merck, Roche/Genentech, Abbvie, AstraZeneca/Merck, and Repare Therapeutics; advisory board participation (no fee) for Blueprint Medicine; and leadership/fiduciary roles for the GOG Foundation Board of Directors (travel cost reimbursement) and NRG Oncology Board of Directors (unpaid). The remaining authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Références
Histopathology. 2020 Jan;76(1):52-63
pubmed: 31846532
JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2020 Aug;4:680-690
pubmed: 32755459
Int J Mol Sci. 2019 Nov 04;20(21):
pubmed: 31689961
JCO Precis Oncol. 2017 Jul;2017:
pubmed: 28890946
Nat Med. 2017 Jun;23(6):703-713
pubmed: 28481359
Gynecol Oncol. 2016 Oct;143(1):46-53
pubmed: 27421752
Nat Genet. 2017 Jan 31;49(2):170-174
pubmed: 28138153
Clin Cancer Res. 2016 Aug 15;22(16):4215-24
pubmed: 27006490
Clin Cancer Res. 2017 Dec 1;23(23):7232-7241
pubmed: 28939739
BMJ. 2010 Mar 12;340:b5087
pubmed: 20228141
Nature. 2013 May 2;497(7447):67-73
pubmed: 23636398
Br J Cancer. 2023 Mar;128(7):1360-1368
pubmed: 36690721
Mod Pathol. 2022 Sep;35(9):1269-1278
pubmed: 35365770
Lancet Oncol. 2014 Jun;15(7):e268-78
pubmed: 24872110
CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 May;71(3):209-249
pubmed: 33538338
N Engl J Med. 2022 Jan 20;386(3):241-251
pubmed: 34534430
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2018 Feb;16(2):201-209
pubmed: 29439179
J Pathol. 2020 Mar;250(3):336-345
pubmed: 31829441
N Engl J Med. 2022 Mar 24;386(12):1143-1154
pubmed: 35320644
Clin Cancer Res. 2008 Mar 15;14(6):1692-700
pubmed: 18310315
J Clin Oncol. 2018 Jul 10;36(20):2044-2051
pubmed: 29584549
JCO Precis Oncol. 2017;2017:
pubmed: 30211344
Clin Cancer Res. 2021 May 1;27(9):2613-2623
pubmed: 33602681
Ann Oncol. 2018 May 1;29(5):1180-1188
pubmed: 29432521
Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2019 Jan;38 Suppl 1:S123-S131
pubmed: 29517499
Mod Pathol. 2023 Apr;36(4):100085
pubmed: 36788084
Gynecol Oncol. 2018 Jan;148(1):174-180
pubmed: 29132872
Am J Surg Pathol. 2018 May;42(5):561-568
pubmed: 29505428
Gynecol Oncol. 2022 May;165(2):201-214
pubmed: 35246332
Am J Surg Pathol. 2007 May;31(5):744-51
pubmed: 17460459
Gynecol Oncol. 2021 May;161(2):535-544
pubmed: 33622519
J Pathol. 2020 Mar;250(3):323-335
pubmed: 31829442
Clin Cancer Res. 2022 Oct 3;28(19):4302-4311
pubmed: 35849120
Biometrics. 1977 Mar;33(1):159-74
pubmed: 843571
N Engl J Med. 2020 Jun 18;382(25):2419-2430
pubmed: 32469182
Cancer Discov. 2018 Feb;8(2):174-183
pubmed: 29247016
Br J Cancer. 2015 Jul 14;113(2):299-310
pubmed: 26172027
J Mol Diagn. 2015 May;17(3):251-64
pubmed: 25801821