Improving value for underserved populations with a community-based intervention: a retrospective cohort study.

Closing gaps Community based health Higher value Inequity Lower costs Member outcomes Social Determinants of Health

Journal

Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique
ISSN: 0778-7367
Titre abrégé: Arch Public Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9208826

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
29 May 2023
Historique:
received: 12 12 2022
accepted: 23 05 2023
medline: 30 5 2023
pubmed: 30 5 2023
entrez: 29 5 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Healthcare inequity drives high costs, worse outcomes and is heavily influenced by social determinants of health (SDOH). Addressing health behaviors and SDOH through a culturally competent community-based exposure may be effective in improving value for Medicaid enrollees. This study aims to evaluate whether such an exposure lowers costs at equal or improved quality. A retrospective cohort study leveraging claims data was conducted in Detroit, Michigan from April 2021 to April 2022 to examine the impact of a community-based peer support program on clinical, utilization and financial outcomes. A one-to-one propensity matching of 738 pairs of African American Medicaid enrollees was generated, and compared the difference of differences between inpatient, emergency department, prescription and outpatient paid amounts, utilization, and available claims-based quality metrics. Compared to controls, peer support recipients generated significantly lower per member per month costs ($115, (95% CI $20.2 to $210)). Recipients showed a significant increase in the Adult Access to Preventative/Ambulatory Health Services 20-44 year old quality metric (8.31% (95% CI 0.35-16.3%)). Member retention in the health insurance plan was significantly higher for peer support recipients vs. the control group by 3.62% (p < 0.05). Peer support recipients displayed non-significant improvement on all other utilization and actuarial measures. No significant difference was found for any of the other examined quality metrics. Among a population of African American Medicaid enrollees, a culturally competent community-based intervention was associated with lower cost and better member retention with preserved or improved quality.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Healthcare inequity drives high costs, worse outcomes and is heavily influenced by social determinants of health (SDOH). Addressing health behaviors and SDOH through a culturally competent community-based exposure may be effective in improving value for Medicaid enrollees. This study aims to evaluate whether such an exposure lowers costs at equal or improved quality.
METHODS METHODS
A retrospective cohort study leveraging claims data was conducted in Detroit, Michigan from April 2021 to April 2022 to examine the impact of a community-based peer support program on clinical, utilization and financial outcomes. A one-to-one propensity matching of 738 pairs of African American Medicaid enrollees was generated, and compared the difference of differences between inpatient, emergency department, prescription and outpatient paid amounts, utilization, and available claims-based quality metrics.
RESULTS RESULTS
Compared to controls, peer support recipients generated significantly lower per member per month costs ($115, (95% CI $20.2 to $210)). Recipients showed a significant increase in the Adult Access to Preventative/Ambulatory Health Services 20-44 year old quality metric (8.31% (95% CI 0.35-16.3%)). Member retention in the health insurance plan was significantly higher for peer support recipients vs. the control group by 3.62% (p < 0.05). Peer support recipients displayed non-significant improvement on all other utilization and actuarial measures. No significant difference was found for any of the other examined quality metrics.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Among a population of African American Medicaid enrollees, a culturally competent community-based intervention was associated with lower cost and better member retention with preserved or improved quality.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37248512
doi: 10.1186/s13690-023-01117-z
pii: 10.1186/s13690-023-01117-z
pmc: PMC10225756
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

96

Informations de copyright

© 2023. The Author(s).

Références

BMC Public Health. 2011 Aug 15;11:647
pubmed: 21843337
Matern Child Health J. 2013 Oct;17(8):1518-25
pubmed: 23065298
Am J Public Health. 2015 Jul;105 Suppl 3:S452-4
pubmed: 25905851
JAMA. 2018 Mar 13;319(10):1024-1039
pubmed: 29536101
JAMA. 2018 Mar 13;319(10):983-985
pubmed: 29536081
Am J Epidemiol. 1979 Feb;109(2):186-204
pubmed: 425958
Psychol Aging. 2010 Mar;25(1):132-41
pubmed: 20230134
PLoS Med. 2010 Jul 27;7(7):e1000316
pubmed: 20668659
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Nov 2;3(11):e2024984
pubmed: 33151319
Semin Perinatol. 2017 Aug;41(5):258-265
pubmed: 28888263
Psychiatr Serv. 2005 Dec;56(12):1600-2
pubmed: 16339626
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2018 Apr;97(4):407-416
pubmed: 29415329

Auteurs

Claude Pinnock (C)

Wider Circle, Redwood, CA, USA. cpinnock@widercircle.com.

John Rothen (J)

Wider Circle, Redwood, CA, USA.

Tom Carlough (T)

Wider Circle, Redwood, CA, USA.

Nirav R Shah (NR)

Clinical Excellence Research Center, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.

Classifications MeSH