Ulipristal acetate versus levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system for heavy menstrual bleeding (UCON): a randomised controlled phase III trial.
Adenomyosis endometrium
Amenorrhoea
Drug induced liver injury
Fibroid
Heavy menstrual bleeding
Leiomyoma
Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system
Progesterone receptor modulator associated endometrial changes
Quality of life
Randomised controlled trial
Selective progesterone receptor modulator
Ulipristal acetate
Ultrasound
Urgent safety measures
Uterus
Journal
EClinicalMedicine
ISSN: 2589-5370
Titre abrégé: EClinicalMedicine
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101733727
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jun 2023
Jun 2023
Historique:
received:
23
12
2022
revised:
16
04
2023
accepted:
19
04
2023
medline:
30
5
2023
pubmed:
30
5
2023
entrez:
30
5
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Heavy menstrual bleeding affects one in four women and negatively impacts quality of life. Ulipristal acetate is prescribed to treat symptoms associated with uterine fibroids. We compared the effectiveness of ulipristal acetate and the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system at reducing the burden of heavy menstrual bleeding, irrespective of the presence of fibroids. This randomised, open-label, parallel group phase III trial enrolled women over 18 years with heavy menstrual bleeding from 10 UK hospitals. Participants were centrally randomised, in a 1:1 ratio, to either three, 12-week treatment cycles of 5 mg ulipristal acetate daily, separated by 4-week treatment-free intervals, or a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system. The primary outcome, analysed by intention-to-treat, was quality of life measured by the Menorrhagia Multi-Attribute Scale at 12 months. Secondary outcomes included menstrual bleeding and liver function. The trial is registered with ISRCTN, 20426843. Between June 5th, 2015 and February 26th, 2020, 236 women were randomised, either side of a recruitment suspension due to concerns of ulipristal acetate hepatoxicity. Subsequent withdrawal of ulipristal acetate led to early cessation of recruitment but the trial continued in follow-up. The primary outcome substantially improved in both groups, and was 89, (interquartile range [IQR] 65 to 100, n = 53) and 94, (IQR 70 to 100, n = 50; adjusted odds ratio 0.55, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.26-1.17; p = 0.12) in the ulipristal and levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system groups. Rates of amenorrhoea at 12 months were higher in those allocated ulipristal acetate compared to levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (64% versus 25%, adjusted odds ratio 7.12, 95% CI 2.29-22.2). Other outcomes were similar between the two groups and there were no cases of endometrial malignancy or hepatotoxicity due to ulipristal acetate use. Our findings suggested that both treatments improved quality of life. Ulipristal was more effective at inducing amenorrhoea. Ulipristal has been demonstrated to be an effective medical therapeutic option but currently its use has restrictions and requires liver function monitoring. UK Medical Research Council and National Institute of Health Research EME Programme (12/206/52).
Sections du résumé
Background
UNASSIGNED
Heavy menstrual bleeding affects one in four women and negatively impacts quality of life. Ulipristal acetate is prescribed to treat symptoms associated with uterine fibroids. We compared the effectiveness of ulipristal acetate and the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system at reducing the burden of heavy menstrual bleeding, irrespective of the presence of fibroids.
Methods
UNASSIGNED
This randomised, open-label, parallel group phase III trial enrolled women over 18 years with heavy menstrual bleeding from 10 UK hospitals. Participants were centrally randomised, in a 1:1 ratio, to either three, 12-week treatment cycles of 5 mg ulipristal acetate daily, separated by 4-week treatment-free intervals, or a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system. The primary outcome, analysed by intention-to-treat, was quality of life measured by the Menorrhagia Multi-Attribute Scale at 12 months. Secondary outcomes included menstrual bleeding and liver function. The trial is registered with ISRCTN, 20426843.
Findings
UNASSIGNED
Between June 5th, 2015 and February 26th, 2020, 236 women were randomised, either side of a recruitment suspension due to concerns of ulipristal acetate hepatoxicity. Subsequent withdrawal of ulipristal acetate led to early cessation of recruitment but the trial continued in follow-up. The primary outcome substantially improved in both groups, and was 89, (interquartile range [IQR] 65 to 100, n = 53) and 94, (IQR 70 to 100, n = 50; adjusted odds ratio 0.55, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.26-1.17; p = 0.12) in the ulipristal and levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system groups. Rates of amenorrhoea at 12 months were higher in those allocated ulipristal acetate compared to levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (64% versus 25%, adjusted odds ratio 7.12, 95% CI 2.29-22.2). Other outcomes were similar between the two groups and there were no cases of endometrial malignancy or hepatotoxicity due to ulipristal acetate use.
Interpretation
UNASSIGNED
Our findings suggested that both treatments improved quality of life. Ulipristal was more effective at inducing amenorrhoea. Ulipristal has been demonstrated to be an effective medical therapeutic option but currently its use has restrictions and requires liver function monitoring.
Funding
UNASSIGNED
UK Medical Research Council and National Institute of Health Research EME Programme (12/206/52).
Identifiants
pubmed: 37251622
doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.101995
pii: S2589-5370(23)00172-4
pmc: PMC10209678
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
101995Informations de copyright
© 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
LHRW, LJM, JPD, LP, SO, VC, CES, MAL, PPS, EPN, NR, SIS and JW all have no conflicts of interest to declare. ARWW has received consultancy fees (divided with the University of Edinburgh) from Bayer AG and Mithra. TJC has received honoraria from Gedeon Richter and Orbis. DKH has received grant funding from Wellbeing of Women, MRC and North West Cancer Research, and honoraria from the Canadian Society of Fertility and Andrology. SB receives grant funding from NHS Grampian Endowments Funding and NIHR, and royalties from Cambridge University Press and payment (to University of Aberdeen) for speaking at 11th Singapore International Congress on Obstetrics & Gynaecology, and invited lectures to Merck, Organon a and Ferring. He participates on the METAFOR Data Monitoring Committee and ANODE trial. He is board member of NHS Grampian for which University of Aberdeen receive payment. He receives an honorium from Oxford University Press for his role as Editor in Chief, (Human Reproduction Open) is special Senior Editor Cochrane Gynaecology and Infertility (no honorarium). LS has received grant funding from NIHR and EU Horizon 2020 and has received consultancy fees from Gideon Richter. RRC has been supported as a Clinical Research Fellow by Bayer AG between April 2018 to February 2021. HODC receives grant funding from Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council, grants from Medical Research Council/NIHR to support salaries for research staff & study consumables and a Research collaboration grant from Bayer AG, Berlin with salaries for research staff & study consumables. She has personal receipt of royalties from "Up-To-Date" for an article on Abnormal Uterine Bleeding. She has received consulting fees to the University of Edinburgh from Bayer AG (Consultancy and Scientific Advisory Board advice; paid to institution), Gedeon Richter (Consultancy advice; paid to institution) and Myovant Sciences GmbH (Consultancy and Scientific Advisory Board advice; paid to institution). She has received speaking fees to the University of Edinburgh from Vifor Pharma UK Ltd for speaking at a meeting on abnormal uterine bleeding and iron deficiency anaemia (paid to institution) and travel expenses from SAB (Scientific Advisory Board) in March 2020. She is Chair (from 2022) of the Committee for Menstrual Disorders and Related Health Impacts of the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO; no payment received).
Références
Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2022 May;18(5):290-308
pubmed: 35136207
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jun 12;6:CD002126
pubmed: 32529637
Br J Gen Pract. 2004 May;54(502):359-63
pubmed: 15113519
Drug Saf. 2020 Dec;43(12):1277-1285
pubmed: 32748236
ChemMedChem. 2018 Nov 6;13(21):2271-2280
pubmed: 30407750
Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Feb;99(2):290-300
pubmed: 11814511
N Engl J Med. 2020 Jan 23;382(4):328-340
pubmed: 31971678
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Feb 28;(2):CD008994
pubmed: 23450594
N Engl J Med. 2012 Feb 2;366(5):409-20
pubmed: 22296075
Health Technol Assess. 2015 Oct;19(88):i-xxv, 1-118
pubmed: 26507206
Br J Gen Pract. 2016 Dec;66(653):e861-e870
pubmed: 27884916
Med Care. 2003 May;41(5):582-92
pubmed: 12719681
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Jun;220(6):569.e1-569.e7
pubmed: 30885768
Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1990 Aug;97(8):734-9
pubmed: 2400752
Qual Life Res. 1996 Feb;5(1):81-90
pubmed: 8901370
Lancet. 2019 Oct 19;394(10207):1425-1436
pubmed: 31522846
Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1998 Nov;105(11):1155-9
pubmed: 9853763
Br J Gen Pract. 2022 Nov 24;72(725):e857-e864
pubmed: 36376071
Qual Life Res. 2011 Dec;20(10):1727-36
pubmed: 21479777
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2018 Dec;143(3):393-408
pubmed: 30198563
Fertil Steril. 2016 Jan;105(1):165-173.e4
pubmed: 26477496
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2021 Jul;87(7):2685-2697
pubmed: 33341097
N Engl J Med. 2012 Feb 2;366(5):421-32
pubmed: 22296076