Congenital rubella syndrome surveillance in India, 2016-21: Analysis of five years surveillance data.
Congenital Rubella Syndrome
India
Surveillance
Journal
Heliyon
ISSN: 2405-8440
Titre abrégé: Heliyon
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101672560
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
May 2023
May 2023
Historique:
received:
25
07
2022
revised:
19
04
2023
accepted:
28
04
2023
medline:
30
5
2023
pubmed:
30
5
2023
entrez:
30
5
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
In India, facility-based surveillance for congenital rubella syndrome (CRS) was initiated in 2016 to estimate the burden and monitor the progress made in rubella control. We analyzed the surveillance data for 2016-2021 from 14 sentinel sites to describe the epidemiology of CRS. We analyzed the surveillance data to describe the distribution of suspected and laboratory confirmed CRS patients by time, place and person characteristics. We compared clinical signs of laboratory confirmed CRS and discarded case-patients to find independent predictors of CRS using logistic regression analysis and developed a risk prediction model. During 2016-21, surveillance sites enrolled 3940 suspected CRS case-patients (Age 3.5 months, SD: 3.5). About one-fifth (n = 813, 20.6%) were enrolled during newborn examination. Of the suspected CRS patients, 493 (12.5%) had laboratory evidence of rubella infection. The proportion of laboratory confirmed CRS cases declined from 26% in 2017 to 8.7% in 2021. Laboratory confirmed patients had higher odds of having hearing impairment (Odds ratio [OR] = 9.5, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 5.6-16.2), cataract (OR = 7.8, 95% CI: 5.4-11.2), pigmentary retinopathy (OR = 6.7, 95 CI: 3.3-13.6), structural heart defect with hearing impairment (OR = 3.8, 95% CI: 1.2-12.2) and glaucoma (OR = 3.1, 95% CI: 1.2-8.1). Nomogram, along with a web version, was developed. Rubella continues to be a significant public health issue in India. The declining trend of test positivity among suspected CRS case-patients needs to be monitored through continued surveillance in these sentinel sites.
Sections du résumé
Background
UNASSIGNED
In India, facility-based surveillance for congenital rubella syndrome (CRS) was initiated in 2016 to estimate the burden and monitor the progress made in rubella control. We analyzed the surveillance data for 2016-2021 from 14 sentinel sites to describe the epidemiology of CRS.
Method
UNASSIGNED
We analyzed the surveillance data to describe the distribution of suspected and laboratory confirmed CRS patients by time, place and person characteristics. We compared clinical signs of laboratory confirmed CRS and discarded case-patients to find independent predictors of CRS using logistic regression analysis and developed a risk prediction model.
Results
UNASSIGNED
During 2016-21, surveillance sites enrolled 3940 suspected CRS case-patients (Age 3.5 months, SD: 3.5). About one-fifth (n = 813, 20.6%) were enrolled during newborn examination. Of the suspected CRS patients, 493 (12.5%) had laboratory evidence of rubella infection. The proportion of laboratory confirmed CRS cases declined from 26% in 2017 to 8.7% in 2021. Laboratory confirmed patients had higher odds of having hearing impairment (Odds ratio [OR] = 9.5, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 5.6-16.2), cataract (OR = 7.8, 95% CI: 5.4-11.2), pigmentary retinopathy (OR = 6.7, 95 CI: 3.3-13.6), structural heart defect with hearing impairment (OR = 3.8, 95% CI: 1.2-12.2) and glaucoma (OR = 3.1, 95% CI: 1.2-8.1). Nomogram, along with a web version, was developed.
Conclusions
UNASSIGNED
Rubella continues to be a significant public health issue in India. The declining trend of test positivity among suspected CRS case-patients needs to be monitored through continued surveillance in these sentinel sites.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37251844
doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15965
pii: S2405-8440(23)03172-9
pmc: PMC10209330
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e15965Informations de copyright
© 2023 The Authors.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Références
PLoS One. 2019 Nov 15;14(11):e0225253
pubmed: 31730633
J Infect Dis. 2011 Sep 1;204 Suppl 2:S683-9
pubmed: 21954267
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2022 Dec 16;71(50):1569-1575
pubmed: 36520657
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2020 Feb 3;14(2):e0007982
pubmed: 32012162
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2018 Sep 14;67(36):1012-1016
pubmed: 30212443
J Prev Med Hyg. 2009 Dec;50(4):221-6
pubmed: 20812517
Lancet. 2022 Apr 2;399(10332):1336-1346
pubmed: 35367004
Lancet. 2015 Jun 6;385(9984):2297-307
pubmed: 25576992