Assessment of asymmetry at different intensities between conventional and paralympic powerlifting athletes.
Biomechanical
Disabled persons
Strength
Journal
Heliyon
ISSN: 2405-8440
Titre abrégé: Heliyon
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101672560
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
May 2023
May 2023
Historique:
received:
24
03
2023
revised:
09
05
2023
accepted:
10
05
2023
medline:
30
5
2023
pubmed:
30
5
2023
entrez:
30
5
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Powerlifting competitions require consistent and symmetric lifting of heavy loads and maximal effort, in which, asymmetric lifting results in trial invalidation. Symmetry during this very high intensity movement is determinant to athletes' performance and success in competitions. This study aimed to compare the asymmetry between Conventional Powerlifting athletes (CP) and Paralympic (PP) athletes at intensities of 45 and 80% 1RM before and after a training session. Twenty-two male athletes (11 CP: 29.84 ± 4.21 and 11 PP: 30.81 ± 8.05 years old) participated in this study. Mean Propulsive Velocity (MPV), Maximum Velocity (Vmax) and Power during the concentric and eccentric phases were evaluated at 45%-1RM before and after a training session. For the intensity of 80%-1RM, MPV, Vmax and Power were measured in the first and last series (5 series of 5 repetitions: 5X5) of a training session. PP athletes demonstrated lower velocity and greater symmetry at 45%-1RM, but higher velocity and less asymmetry at 80%-1RM, when compared to CP. The data indicated that PP athletes tend to be slower at lower intensities, faster at higher intensities in absolute values, and have greater symmetry than CP.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37251905
doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16211
pii: S2405-8440(23)03418-7
pmc: PMC10213187
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e16211Informations de copyright
© 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Références
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jun 01;17(11):
pubmed: 32492829
J Strength Cond Res. 2020 Aug 27;:
pubmed: 32868675
Physiol Behav. 2020 Dec 1;227:113144
pubmed: 32822710
Sports Med. 2018 Apr;48(4):765-785
pubmed: 29372481
Hum Mov Sci. 2019 Apr;64:67-74
pubmed: 30660073
J Biomech. 2021 Jun 9;122:110478
pubmed: 33964576
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 May 31;18(11):
pubmed: 34072883
J Strength Cond Res. 2023 Feb 1;37(2):452-456
pubmed: 35438674
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2016 Jul;48(7):1379-87
pubmed: 26871989
PLoS One. 2021 Oct 13;16(10):e0257810
pubmed: 34644331
J Strength Cond Res. 2019 Sep;33(9):2579-2593
pubmed: 29742749
Biol Sport. 2019 Dec;36(4):351-356
pubmed: 31938006
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2021 Aug 1;131(2):702-715
pubmed: 34166110
J Biomech. 2021 Jun 23;123:110523
pubmed: 34029786
Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2019 Apr 1;14(4):531-535
pubmed: 30204509
Sports (Basel). 2019 Mar 04;7(3):
pubmed: 30836680
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 May 13;18(10):
pubmed: 34067984
Sports Med. 2017 Apr;47(4):663-675
pubmed: 27638040
Sports Biomech. 2023 Jun;22(6):784-785
pubmed: 32319856
Knee. 2021 Mar;29:520-529
pubmed: 33756262
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2020 Nov;120(11):2517-2524
pubmed: 32856145
J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2021 Oct;28:42-48
pubmed: 34776173
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2020 Jul;120(7):1681-1688
pubmed: 32472418
J Sports Sci. 2018 May;36(10):1135-1144
pubmed: 28767317
J Hum Kinet. 2022 Sep 08;83:223-234
pubmed: 36157940
Int J Sports Med. 2022 Nov;43(12):1033-1042
pubmed: 35468640
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2006 Apr;96(6):722-8
pubmed: 16506058
Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:193741
pubmed: 26543850
J Sports Sci. 2016;34(4):289-302
pubmed: 26055387