Review of clinical trials addressing the Boston Keratoprosthesis.


Journal

Canadian journal of ophthalmology. Journal canadien d'ophtalmologie
ISSN: 1715-3360
Titre abrégé: Can J Ophthalmol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0045312

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
27 May 2023
Historique:
received: 27 03 2022
revised: 24 05 2022
accepted: 10 05 2023
pubmed: 31 5 2023
medline: 31 5 2023
entrez: 30 5 2023
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

The Boston Keratoprosthesis (KPro) has gained recognition as an alternative for patients with severe corneal disease and a poor probability of success with traditional penetrating keratoplasty. This review summarizes the knowledge clinical trials have brought to KPro and discusses ongoing trials. Systematic review. A literature review across PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, Cochrane CENTRAL, and ClinicalTrials.gov was performed to identify relevant published clinical trials reporting on the KPro from all years up until September 2021. All published trials were included. There are 6 published and 6 ongoing clinical trials studying the Boston KPro. The number of patients included per trial ranged from 8 to 37. The average age of patients included per trial ranged from 39 to 62 years. Patients were followed for an average of 36.3 ± 41.8 months. Fifty percent (3 of 6) of KPro clinical trials were randomized. Indication for KPro was reported in 67% of trials (4 of 6), with primary KPro accounting for 22% of unique eyes (13 of 58) and KPro after corneal graft failure accounting for 41% of unique eyes (24 of 58), when reported. Using version 2 of the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials (RoB 2) to assess quality and risk of bias, 50% of trials (3 of 6) had a low risk of bias, 33% (2 of 6) had some bias concerns, and 17% (1 of 6) had a high risk of bias. There are few clinical trials published and underway on the Boston KPro, and none directly compare KPro outcomes with repeat corneal transplantation. There is a need for long-term clinical trials on the KPro to provide quality evidence for clinical decision making.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37253429
pii: S0008-4182(23)00166-7
doi: 10.1016/j.jcjo.2023.05.003
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 Canadian Ophthalmological Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Daniel Milad (D)

Department of Ophthalmology, University of Montreal Health Centre (CHUM), Montreal, QC.

Yelin Yang (Y)

Department of Ophthalmology, University of Montreal Health Centre (CHUM), Montreal, QC.

Kerolos Eisa (K)

Department of Public Health, Queens University, Kingston, ON.

Mona Harissi-Dagher (M)

Department of Ophthalmology, University of Montreal Health Centre (CHUM), Montreal, QC. Electronic address: monadagher@hotmail.com.

Classifications MeSH