Patient-clinician dynamics in remote consultations: a qualitative study of cardiology and rheumatology outpatient clinics in the UK.
CARDIOLOGY
QUALITATIVE RESEARCH
Quality in health care
RHEUMATOLOGY
Journal
BMJ open
ISSN: 2044-6055
Titre abrégé: BMJ Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101552874
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
30 05 2023
30 05 2023
Historique:
medline:
1
6
2023
pubmed:
31
5
2023
entrez:
30
5
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Explore the experiences of patients and clinicians in rheumatology and cardiology outpatient clinics during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic, focusing on the impact of remote consultations on interpersonal dynamics. Qualitative study using semistructured interviews, conducted between February and June 2021. The rheumatology and cardiology departments of a general hospital in England, UK. All clinicians and a convenience sample of 100 patients in each department who had taken part in a remote consultation in the past month were invited to take part. Twenty-five interviews were conducted (13 with patients, 12 with clinicians). Three themes were developed through the analysis: adapting to the dynamics of remote consultations, impact on the patient's experience and impact on the clinician's experience. The majority of remote consultations experienced by both patients and clinicians had been via telephone. Both clinicians and patients found remote consultations to be more business-like and focused, with the absence of pauses restricting time for reflection. For patients with stable, well-managed conditions, remote consultations were felt to be appropriate and could be more convenient than in-person consultations. However, the loss of visual cues meant some patients felt they could not give a holistic view of their condition and limited clinicians' ability to gather and convey information. Clinicians adjusted their approach by asking more questions, checking understanding more frequently and expressing empathy verbally, but felt patients still shared fewer concerns remotely than in person; a perception with which patients concurred. These findings highlight the importance of ensuring, for each patient, that remote care is appropriate. Future research should focus on developing ways to support both clinicians and patients to gather and provide all information necessary during remote consultations, to enhance communication and trust.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37253488
pii: bmjopen-2022-070923
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070923
pmc: PMC10254951
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e070923Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: None declared.
Références
BMC Geriatr. 2023 May 5;23(1):270
pubmed: 37142989
J Patient Exp. 2021 Aug 19;8:23743735211034973
pubmed: 34435089
BMJ Open. 2021 Apr 22;11(4):e049210
pubmed: 33888531
BMJ Open Qual. 2020 May;9(2):
pubmed: 32439740
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2022 Jan;27(1):62-73
pubmed: 34337980
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Feb 20;22(2):e16694
pubmed: 32130133
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Sep 07;(9):CD002098
pubmed: 26343551
Future Healthc J. 2021 Mar;8(1):e27-e31
pubmed: 33791471
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 Apr 2;23(1):312
pubmed: 35366845
Health Expect. 2020 Feb;23(1):159-168
pubmed: 31625264
Cureus. 2020 Nov 4;12(11):e11320
pubmed: 33262918
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2022 May 30;61(6):2262-2274
pubmed: 34698822
Health Expect. 2022 Apr;25(2):775-790
pubmed: 35014124
Telemed J E Health. 2021 Aug;27(8):881-897
pubmed: 34232749
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Dec 10;22(12):e24531
pubmed: 33156806
Br J Gen Pract. 2022 Apr 28;72(718):e351-e360
pubmed: 35256385
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jun 1;22(6):e13470
pubmed: 32478658
Br J Gen Pract. 2021 Feb 25;71(704):e166-e177
pubmed: 33558332
JMIR Form Res. 2022 Mar 21;6(3):e30486
pubmed: 35311688