Aesthetic Surgery Before-and-After Photography Bias on Instagram.


Journal

Aesthetic plastic surgery
ISSN: 1432-5241
Titre abrégé: Aesthetic Plast Surg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7701756

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
10 2023
Historique:
received: 18 02 2023
accepted: 29 04 2023
medline: 23 10 2023
pubmed: 31 5 2023
entrez: 30 5 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

This study aims to systematically assess body and facial aesthetic surgery before-and-after photography bias on Instagram. An Instagram search using the term "plastic surgeon" was conducted on October 2020. The top 11 plastic surgeons' accounts were selected, and the first 15 images were selected from these profiles pertaining to different anatomical locations. Each photo was analyzed by a blinded board-certified plastic surgeon utilizing a 5-domain clinical photography bias score. The domains covered: (1) photo quality; (2) photo background; (3) position; (4) exposure/coverage; (5) bias. The search strategy identified a total of 161 sets of before and after. The most common anatomical site posted was the nose (n=47), followed by breasts (n=37). The most common angles posted were anterior-posterior view (n=61). The majority of images showed bias toward the post-operative image (70.8%). The main culprit with photo characteristics occurred due to there being a different post-operative background which was more flattering for the post-operative result (n=46, p=0.006) and a different view or angle, which again, flattered the post-operative image (n=36, p=0.02). Other factors that influenced the post-operative bias included photos of the patient covered with clothing (n=15, p=0.014) or standing (n=20, p=0.001), compared to a supine pre-operative image. Before-and-after photography conditions in aesthetic surgery is biased toward the post-operative result on Instagram. This observation was noticed across all surgical anatomical areas. Accounts photographer tends to misrepresent the photo background, view of angle, patients pose or position, or covering certain body parts. This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Identifiants

pubmed: 37253847
doi: 10.1007/s00266-023-03398-9
pii: 10.1007/s00266-023-03398-9
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

2144-2149

Informations de copyright

© 2023. Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature and International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery.

Références

Gould DJ, Grant Stevens W, Nazarian S (2017) A primer on social media for plastic surgeons: what do I need to know about social media and how can it help my practice? Aesthet Surg J 37(5):614–619
doi: 10.1093/asj/sjw246 pubmed: 28158400
Gould DJ, Nazarian S (2018) Social media return on investment: how much is it worth to my practice? Aesthet Surg J 38(5):565–574
doi: 10.1093/asj/sjx152 pubmed: 29092030
Dorfman RG, Vaca EE, Mahmood E, Fine NA, Schierle CF (2018) Plastic surgery-related hashtag utilization on Instagram: implications for education and marketing. Aesthet Surg J 38(3):332–338
doi: 10.1093/asj/sjx120 pubmed: 29040378
Fan KL, Graziano F, Economides JM, Black CK, Song DH (2019) The public’s preferences on plastic surgery social media engagement and professionalism: demystifying the impact of demographics. Plast Reconstr Surg 143(2):619–630
doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000005205 pubmed: 30688911
Salinas CA, Kuruoglu D, Mayer HF, Huang TC, Sharaf B (2021) Who is talking about #Facelift on Instagram? Eur J Plast Surg 2:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-021-01909-y
doi: 10.1007/s00238-021-01909-y
Chopan M, Sayadi L, Clark EM, Maguire K (2019) Plastic surgery and social media: examining perceptions. Plast Reconstr Surg 143(4):1259–1265
doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000005445 pubmed: 30921153
Sorice SC, Li AY, Gilstrap J, Canales FL, Furnas HJ (2017) Social media and the plastic surgery patient. Plast Reconstr Surg 140(5):1047–1056
doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000003769 pubmed: 29068943
Vaca EE, Perez MM, Lamano JB, Turin SY, Moradian S, Fagien S, Schierle C (2021) Photographic misrepresentation on Instagram after facial cosmetic surgery: is increased photography bias associated with greater user engagement? Aesthet Surg J 41(11):NP1778–NP1785. https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjab203
doi: 10.1093/asj/sjab203 pubmed: 33942072

Auteurs

Rawan ElAbd (R)

Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada.
Division of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Jaber AlAhmed Hospital, Surra, Kuwait.

Khalifa Alghanim (K)

Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Western University, London, Canada.

Meshari Alnesef (M)

Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada.

Sara Alyouha (S)

Division of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Jaber AlAhmed Hospital, Surra, Kuwait.
Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kuwait University, Kuwait, Kuwait.

Osama A Samargandi (OA)

Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. osamargandi@dal.ca.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH