SAGES SAFE CHOLE program changes surgeons practice in France-results of the FCVD implementation of SAFE CHOLE in France.
Cholecystectomy
Education
Practice
SAFE CHOLE
Safety
Journal
Surgical endoscopy
ISSN: 1432-2218
Titre abrégé: Surg Endosc
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 8806653
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 2023
08 2023
Historique:
received:
24
03
2023
accepted:
08
05
2023
medline:
14
7
2023
pubmed:
31
5
2023
entrez:
30
5
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
With the Society of Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons supervision, the Safe Cholecystectomy Task Force (SAFE CHOLE) was translated into French by the the Federation of Visceral and Digestive Surgery (FCVD) and adopted to run on its national e-learning platform for surgical continuing medical education (CME). The objective of this study was to assess the impact of the SAFE CHOLE (SF) program on the knowledge and practice of French surgeons performing cholecystectomy and participating in the FCVD lead CME activity. To obtain CME certification, each participant must fill out three FCVD validated questionnaires regarding (1) the participants' routine practice for cholecystectomy, (2) the participants' knowledge and practice after successful completion of the program, and (3) the educational value of the SC program. From 2021 to 2022, 481 surgeons completed the program. The overall satisfaction rate for the program was 81%, and 53% of the surgeons were practicing routine cholangiography before the SC program. Eighty percent declared having acquired new knowledge. Fifty-six percent reported a change in their practice of cholecystectomy. Of those, 46% started routinely using the critical view of safety, 12% used a time-out prior transection of vital structures, and 11% adopted routine intraoperative cholangiography. Sixty-seven percent reported performing a sub-total cholecystectomy in case the CVS was unobtainable. If faced with BDI, 45% would transfer to a higher level of care, 33% would seek help from a colleague, and 10% would proceed with a repair. Ninety percent recommended adoption of SC by all general surgeons and 98% reported improvement of patient safety. Large-scale implementation of the SC program in France is feasible within a broad group of diverse specialty surgeons and appears to have a significant impact on their practice. These data should encourage other surgeons and health systems to engage in this program.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
With the Society of Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons supervision, the Safe Cholecystectomy Task Force (SAFE CHOLE) was translated into French by the the Federation of Visceral and Digestive Surgery (FCVD) and adopted to run on its national e-learning platform for surgical continuing medical education (CME). The objective of this study was to assess the impact of the SAFE CHOLE (SF) program on the knowledge and practice of French surgeons performing cholecystectomy and participating in the FCVD lead CME activity.
METHODS
To obtain CME certification, each participant must fill out three FCVD validated questionnaires regarding (1) the participants' routine practice for cholecystectomy, (2) the participants' knowledge and practice after successful completion of the program, and (3) the educational value of the SC program.
RESULTS
From 2021 to 2022, 481 surgeons completed the program. The overall satisfaction rate for the program was 81%, and 53% of the surgeons were practicing routine cholangiography before the SC program. Eighty percent declared having acquired new knowledge. Fifty-six percent reported a change in their practice of cholecystectomy. Of those, 46% started routinely using the critical view of safety, 12% used a time-out prior transection of vital structures, and 11% adopted routine intraoperative cholangiography. Sixty-seven percent reported performing a sub-total cholecystectomy in case the CVS was unobtainable. If faced with BDI, 45% would transfer to a higher level of care, 33% would seek help from a colleague, and 10% would proceed with a repair. Ninety percent recommended adoption of SC by all general surgeons and 98% reported improvement of patient safety.
CONCLUSIONS
Large-scale implementation of the SC program in France is feasible within a broad group of diverse specialty surgeons and appears to have a significant impact on their practice. These data should encourage other surgeons and health systems to engage in this program.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37253869
doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10128-4
pii: 10.1007/s00464-023-10128-4
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
6483-6490Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
Références
Bray F, Balcaen T, Baro E, Gandon A, Ficheur G, Chazard E (2019) Increased incidence of cholecystectomy related to gallbladder disease in France: analysis of 807,307 cholecystectomy procedures over a period of seven years. J Visc Surg 156:209–215
doi: 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2018.12.003
pubmed: 30573436
Slim K, Martin G (2013) Does routine intra-operative cholangiography reduce the risk of biliary injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy? An evidence-based approach. J Visc Surg 150:321–324
doi: 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2013.06.002
pubmed: 23911201
Temperley HC, O’Sullivan NJ, Grainger R, Bolger JC (2023) Is the use of a routine intraoperative cholangiogram necessary in laparoscopic cholecystectomy? Surgeon 27:S1479–S1666
Flum DR, Cheadle A, Prela C, Dellinger EP, Chan L (2003) Bile duct injury during cholecystectomy and survival in medicare beneficiaries. JAMA 290:2168–2173
doi: 10.1001/jama.290.16.2168
pubmed: 14570952
Waage A, Nilsson M (2006) Iatrogenic bile duct injury: a populationbased study of 152 776 cholecystectomies in the Swedish inpatient registry. Arch Surg 141:1207–1213
doi: 10.1001/archsurg.141.12.1207
pubmed: 17178963
Tornqvist B, Stromberg C, Akre O, Enochsson L, Nilsson M (2015) Selective intraoperative cholangiography and risk of bile duct injury during cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 102:952–958
doi: 10.1002/bjs.9832
pubmed: 25919401
Barrett M, Asbun HJ, Chien HL, Brunt LM, Telem DA (2018) Bile duct injury and morbidity following cholecystectomy: a need for improvement. Surg Endosc 32:1683–2168
doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5847-8
pubmed: 28916877
Tornqvist B, Zheng Z, Ye W, Waage A, Nilsson M (2009) Long-term effects of iatrogenic bile duct injury during cholecystectomy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 7:1013–1018
doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2009.05.014
pubmed: 19465151
Booij KAC, de Reuver PR, van Dieren S, van Delden OM, Rauws EA, Busch OR, van Gulik TM, Gouma DJ (2018) Long-term impact of bile duct injury on morbidity, mortality, quality of life, and work related limitations. Ann Surg 268:143–115
doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002258
pubmed: 28426479
Borie F, Mathonnet M, Deleuze A, Gravié JF, Gugenheim J (2021) The cost and the effectiveness of cholangiography for the diagnosis and treatment of a bile duct injury after difficult identification of the cystic duct. J Gastrointest Surg. 25(6):1430–1436
doi: 10.1007/s11605-020-04640-4
pubmed: 32410182
Pucher PH, Brunt LM, Fanelli RD, Asbun HJ, Aggarwal R (2015) SAGES expert Delphi consensus: critical factors for safe surgical practice in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 29:3074–3085
doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4079-z
pubmed: 25669635
Fédération de chirurgie viscérale et digestive (2014) Risk management to decrease bile duct injury associated with cholecystectomy: measures to improve patient safety. J Visc Surg 151:241–244
doi: 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2014.04.003
Gugenheim J, Debs T, Gravié JF, Deleuze A, Millat B, Borie F, Mathonnet M (2020) Results of the FUSE evaluation project in France. Surg Endosc 34(4):1819–1822
doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06938-0
pubmed: 31218424
Gupta V, Jain G (2019) Safe laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Adoption of universal culture of safety in cholecystectomy. World J Gastrointest Surg 11(2):62–84
doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v11.i2.62
pubmed: 30842813
pmcid: 6397793
Weis J, Brunt LM, Madani A, Telem D, Nagaraj M, Asbun H, Davis BR, Dissanaike S, Ujiki MB, Westcott CJ, Alseidi A, SAGES Safe Chole Task Force (2023) SAGES safe cholecystectomy modules improve practicing surgeons’ judgment: results of a randomized, controlled trial. Surg Endosc 37:862–870
doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09503-4
pubmed: 36006521
Avgerinos C, Kelgiorgi D, Touloumis Z, Baltatzi L, Dervenis C (2009) One thousand laparoscopic cholecystectomies in a single surgical unit using the “critical view of safety” technique. J Gastrointest Surg 13:498–503
doi: 10.1007/s11605-008-0748-8
pubmed: 19009323
Sanjay P, Fulke JL, Exon DJ (2010) ‘Critical view of safety’ as an alternative to routine intraoperative cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute biliary pathology. J Gastrointest Surg 14:1280–1284
doi: 10.1007/s11605-010-1251-6
pubmed: 20535578
Tsalis K, Antoniou N, Koukouritaki Z, Patridas D, Christoforidis E, Lazaridis C (2015) Open-access technique and “critical view of safety” as the safest way to perform laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 25:119–124
doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000055
pubmed: 24752164
Yegiyants S, Collins JC (2008) Operative strategy can reduce the incidence of major bile duct injury in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am Surg 74:985–987
doi: 10.1177/000313480807401022
pubmed: 18942628
Singh K, Ohri A (2006) Anatomic landmarks: their usefulness in safe laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 20:1754–1758
doi: 10.1007/s00464-005-0528-4
pubmed: 17001444
Ji W, Li LT, Li JS (2006) Role of laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy in the treatment of complicated cholecystitis. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 5:584–589
pubmed: 17085347
Nakajima J, Sasaki A, Obuchi T, Baba S, Nitta H, Wakabayashi G (2009) Laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy for severe cholecystitis. Surg Today 39:870–875
doi: 10.1007/s00595-008-3975-4
pubmed: 19784726
Cox MR, Wilson TG, Jeans PL, Padbury RT, Toouli J (1994) Minimizing the risk of bile duct injury at laparoscopic cholecystectomy. World J Surg 18:422–426
doi: 10.1007/BF00316827
pubmed: 8091785
Hunter JG (1991) Avoidance of bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 162:71–76
doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(91)90207-T
pubmed: 1829588
Kaya B, Fersahoglu MM, Kilic F, Onur E, Memisoglu K (2017) Importance of critical view of safety in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a survey of 120 serial patients, with no incidence of complications. Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 21:17–20
doi: 10.14701/ahbps.2017.21.1.17
pubmed: 28317041
pmcid: 5353907
Brunt LM, Deziel DJ, Telem DA, Strasberg SM, Aggarwal R, Asbun H, Bonjer J, McDonald M, Alseidi A, Ujiki M, Riall TS, Hammill C, Moulton CA, Pucher PH, Parks RW, Ansari MT, Connor S, Dirks RC, Anderson B, Altieri MS, Tsamalaidze L, Stefanidis D, and the Prevention of Bile Duct Injury Consensus Work Group (2020) Safe cholecystectomy multi-society practice guideline and state-of-the-art consensus conference on prevention of bile duct injury during cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 34:2827–2855
doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07568-7
pubmed: 32399938
Altieri MS, Yang J, Obeid N, Zhu C, Talamini M, Pryor A (2018) Increasing bile duct injury and decreasing utilization of intraoperative cholangiogram and common bile duct exploration over 14 years: an analysis of outcomes in New York State. Surg Endosc 32:667–674
doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5719-2
pubmed: 28726135
Georgiou K, Sandblom G, Alexakis N, Enochsson L (2022) Intraoperative cholangiography 2020: Quo vadis? A systematic review of the literature. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 21:145–153
doi: 10.1016/j.hbpd.2022.01.002
pubmed: 35031229
Tornqvist B, Stromberg C, Persson G, Nilsson M (2012) Effect of intended intraoperative cholangiography and early detection of bile duct injury on survival after cholecystectomy: population based cohort study. BMJ 11(345):e6457
doi: 10.1136/bmj.e6457
Z’Graggen K, Wehrli H, Metzger A, Buehler M, Frei E, Klaiber C, Swiss Association of Laparoscopic and Thoracoscopic Surgery (1998) Complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in Switzerland. A prospective 3-year study of 10,174 patients. Surg Endosc 12:1303–1310
doi: 10.1007/s004649900846
pubmed: 9788852
Ludwig K, Bernhardt J, Steffen H, Lorenz D (2002) Contribution of intraoperative cholangiography to incidence and outcome of common bile duct injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 16:1098–1104
doi: 10.1007/s00464-001-9183-6
pubmed: 12165830
Metcalfe MS, Ong T, Bruening MH, Iswariah H, Wemyss-Holden SA, Maddern GJ (2004) Is laparoscopic intraoperative cholangiogram a matter of routine? Am J Surg 187:475–481
doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2003.12.047
pubmed: 15041494
Giger U, Ouaissi M, Schmitz SF, Krähenbühl S, Krähenbühl L (2011) Bile duct injury and use of cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 98:391–396
doi: 10.1002/bjs.7335
pubmed: 21254014
Woods MS, Traverso LW, Kozarek RA et al (1995) Biliary tract complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy are detected more frequently with routine intraoperative cholangiography. Surg Endosc 9:1076–1080
doi: 10.1007/BF00188990
pubmed: 8553206
Gigot J, Etienne J, Aerts R, Wibin E, Dallemagne B, Deweer F, Fortunati D, Legrand M, Vereecken L, Doumont J, Van Reepinghen P, Beguin C (1997) The dramatic reality of biliary tract injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. An anonymous multicenter Belgian survey of 65 patients. Surg Endosc 11:1171–1178
doi: 10.1007/s004649900563
pubmed: 9373288
Slater K, Strong RW, Wall DR, Lynch SV (2002) Iatrogenic bile duct injury: the scurge of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. ANZ J Surg 72:83–88
doi: 10.1046/j.1445-2197.2002.02315.x
pubmed: 12074081