Temporal expectations mediated the repetition effect in a sequence in two ways.
Expectation
Mental sets
Problem solving
Repetition effects
Journal
Cognitive processing
ISSN: 1612-4790
Titre abrégé: Cogn Process
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 101177984
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Nov 2023
Nov 2023
Historique:
received:
16
08
2021
accepted:
15
05
2023
medline:
28
9
2023
pubmed:
31
5
2023
entrez:
31
5
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The repetition priming effect generally refers to facilitated responding in instances where the same stimulus or a very similar stimulus repeats after an initial occurrence. Prior studies showed that the repetition priming effect was greater when repetitive stimuli appeared at expected times than when they appeared at less expected times. However, in addition to the expectation for repetition, the expectation for nonrepetitive stimuli may also arise in a sequence, especially after repetitive stimuli continuously appeared several times. This study was designed to further reveal how these two kinds of expectations influence the repetition effect in a sequence. Participants were asked to solve 3, 4 or 5 repetitive tasks followed by a novel task in the experimental group, a situation where the expectations for repetitive events arise in the first three serial positions but that for nonrepetitive events arise in the fourth, fifth and sixth serial positions, or were asked to continuously solve 3-5 repetitive tasks in the control group, a situation where only the expectation for repetitive events appears. The results showed that the repetition effect appeared steadily in the whole sequence for the control group, whereas the repetition effect appeared in the early serial positions but was reduced in the later serial position for the experimental group. The findings revealed the dual influences of temporal expectations on repetition effects in a sequence.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37256504
doi: 10.1007/s10339-023-01141-5
pii: 10.1007/s10339-023-01141-5
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
463-469Subventions
Organisme : national natural science foundation of china
ID : 31700956
Organisme : national natural science foundation of china
ID : 32060194
Organisme : postdoctoral research foundation of china
ID : 2018M632598
Organisme : postdoctoral research foundation of china
ID : 2018T110657
Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Marta Olivetti Belardinelli.
Références
Arenas MC, Manzanedo C (2016) Novelty seeking. In: Zeigler-Hill V, Shackelford T (eds) Encyclopedia of personality and individual differences. Springer, Cham
Asaridou SS, Takashima A, Dediu D, Hagoort P, McQueen JM (2016) Repetition suppression in the left inferior frontal gyrus predicts tone learning performance. Cereb Cortex 26(6):2728–2742
pubmed: 26113631
doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhv126
Auksztulewicz R, Friston K (2016) Repetition suppression and its contextual determinants in predictive coding. Cortex 80:125–140
pubmed: 26861557
pmcid: 5405056
doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2015.11.024
Bilalić M, Mcleod P, Gobet F (2008) Why good thoughts block better ones: the mechanism of the pernicious Einstellung (set) effect. Cognition 108(3):652–661
pubmed: 18565505
doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.05.005
Bilalić M, McLeod P, Gobet F (2010) The mechanism of the Einstellung (set) effect: a pervasive source of cognitive bias. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 19(2):111–115
doi: 10.1177/0963721410363571
Bilalić M, Mcleod P (2014) Why good thoughts block better ones. Sci Am 310(3):74–79
pubmed: 24660332
doi: 10.1038/scientificamerican0314-74
Chi RP, Snyder AW (2011) Facilitate insight by non-invasive brain stimulation. PLoS ONE 6(2):e16655
pubmed: 21311746
pmcid: 3032738
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0016655
Crooks NM, McNeil NM (2009) Increased practice with “set” problems hinders performance on the water jar task. In: Proceedings of the annual meeting of the cognitive science society, vol. 31, no. 31
DeCaro M (2016) Inducing mental set constrains procedural flexibility and conceptual understanding in mathematics. Mem Cognit 44(7):1138–1148
pubmed: 27126874
doi: 10.3758/s13421-016-0614-y
Ellis JJ, Reingold EM (2014) The Einstellung effect in anagram problem solving: evidence from eye movements. Front Psychol 5:679
pubmed: 25071650
pmcid: 4079068
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00679
Feuerriegel Churches O, Coussens S, Keage H (2019) Temporal expectations modulate face image repetition suppression of early stimulus evoked event-related potentials. Neuropsychologia 122:76–87
pubmed: 30468778
doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.11.010
Frings D (2011) The effects of group monitoring on fatigue-related Einstellung during mathematical problem solving. J Exp Psychol Appl 17(4):371–381
pubmed: 21843017
doi: 10.1037/a0025131
Francis WS, Camacho A, Lara C (2014) Words translated in sentence contexts produce repetition priming in visual word comprehension and spoken word production. Mem Cognit 42:1143–1154
pubmed: 24867824
doi: 10.3758/s13421-014-0423-0
Grotheer M, Kovács G (2016) Can predictive coding explain repetition suppression? Cortex 80:113–124
pubmed: 26861559
doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2015.11.027
Hsu YF, Hämäläinen JA, Waszak F (2014) Repetition suppression comprises both attention-independent and attention-dependent processes. Neuroimage 98:168–175
pubmed: 24821530
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.04.084
Huang F, Fan J, Luo J (2015) The neural basis of novelty and appropriateness in processing of creative chunk decomposition. Neuroimage 113:122–132
pubmed: 25797834
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.03.030
Huang F, Tang S, Hu Z (2018) Unconditional perseveration of the short-term mental set on chunk decomposition. Front Psychol 9:02568
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02568
Huang F, Han L, Jiang Y, Li F, Luo J (2019) Neural adaptation and cognitive inflexibility in repeated problem-solving behaviors. Cortex 119:470–479
pubmed: 31505438
doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2019.08.001
Jonathan G, Keren R, Nachshon M, Leonardo F (2012) “Mind the trap”: mindfulness practice reduces cognitive rigidity. PLoS ONE 7(5):e36206
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0036206
Kim H (2017) Brain regions that show repetition suppression and enhancement: a meta-analysis of 137 neuroimaging experiments. Hum Brain Mapp 38(4):1894–1913
pubmed: 28009076
doi: 10.1002/hbm.23492
Kluger AN, Siegfried Z, Ebstein RP (2002) A meta-analysis of the association between drd4 polymorphism and novelty seeking. Mol Psychiatry 7(7):712–717
pubmed: 12192615
doi: 10.1038/sj.mp.4001082
Knoblich G, Ohlsson S, Haider H, Rhenius D (1999) Constraint relaxation and chunk decomposition in insight problem solving. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 25(6):1534–1555
doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.25.6.1534
Kovács G, Schweinberger SR (2016) Repetition suppression-an integrative view. Cortex 80:1–4
pubmed: 27221646
doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2016.04.022
Lemaire P, Leclère M (2014) Strategy repetition in young and older adults: a study in arithmetic. Dev Psychol 50(2):460–468
pubmed: 23795553
doi: 10.1037/a0033527
Lovett MC, Anderson JR (1996) History of success and current context in problem solving: combined influences on operator selection. Cognit Psychol 31(2):168–217
doi: 10.1006/cogp.1996.0016
Luchins AS (1942) Mechanization in problem solving—the effect of Einstellung. Psychol Monogr 54(6):i–95
doi: 10.1037/h0093502
Luchins AS, Luchins EH (1969) Einstellung effect and group problem solving. J Soc Psychol 77(77):79–89
doi: 10.1080/00224545.1969.9919848
Martin-Arevalo E, Kingstone A, Lupianez J (2013) Is “inhibition of return” due to the inhibition of the return of attention? Q J Exp Psychol 66(2):347–359
doi: 10.1080/17470218.2012.711844
Mason MF, Norton MI, Van Horn JD, Wegner DM, Grafton ST, Macrae CN (2007) Wandering minds: the default network and stimulus-independent thought. Science 315(5810):393–395
pubmed: 17234951
pmcid: 1821121
doi: 10.1126/science.1131295
Mayrhauser L, Bergmann J, Crone J, Kronbichler M (2014) Neural repetition suppression: evidence for perceptual expectation in object-selective regions. Front Hum Neurosci 8:225
pubmed: 24860461
pmcid: 4029021
doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00225
Neroni MA, Vasconcelos LA, Crilly N (2017) Computer-based ‘mental set’ tasks: an alternative approach to studying design fixation. J Mech Des 139(7):071102
doi: 10.1115/1.4036562
Netser S, Zahar Y, Gutfreund Y (2011) Stimulus-specific adaptation: can it be a neural correlate of behavioral habituation? J Neurosci 31(49):17811–17820
pubmed: 22159097
pmcid: 6634140
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4790-11.2011
Ollinger M, Jones G, Knoblich G (2008) Investigating the effect of mental set on insight problem solving. Exp Psychol 55(4):270–282
doi: 10.1027/1618-3169.55.4.269
Ollinger M, Karin M, von Müller A, Carlos CS (2017) Expectation violation in political decision making: a psychological case study. Front Psychol 8:01761
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01761
Ricks TR, Turleyames KJ, Wiley J (2007) Effects of working memory capacity on mental set due to domain knowledge. Mem Cognit 35(6):1456–1462
pubmed: 18035641
doi: 10.3758/BF03193615
Robertson IH, O’Connell RG (2010) Vigilant attention. In: Nobre AC, Coull JT (eds) Attention and time. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Rostalski SM, Amado C, Kovács G, Feuerriegel D (2020) Measures of repetition suppression in the fusiform face area are inflated by co-occurring effects of statistically learned visual associations. Cortex 131(1):123–136
pubmed: 32858473
doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2020.07.010
Sapir A, Jackson K, Butler J, Paul MA, Abrams RA (2014) Inhibition of return affects contrast sensitivity. Q J Exp Psychol 67:1305–1316
doi: 10.1080/17470218.2013.859282
Schillemans V, Luwel K, Ceulemans E, Onghena P, Verschaffel L (2012) The effect of single versus repeated previous strategy use on individuals’ subsequent strategy choice. Psychol Belgica 52(4):307–325
doi: 10.5334/pb-52-4-307
Schillemans V, Luwel K, Bulté I, Onghena P, Verschaffel L (2010) The influence of previous strategy use on individuals’ subsequent strategy choice: findings from a numerosity judgement task. Psychol Belgica 49(4):191–205
doi: 10.5334/pb-49-4-191
Schultz P, Searleman A (2002) Rigidity of thought and behavior: 100 years of research. Genet Soc Gen Psychol Monogr 128(2):165–207
pubmed: 12194421
Segaert K, Weber K, de Lange FP, Petersson KM, Hagoort P (2013) The suppression of repetition enhancement: a review of fMRI studies. Neuropsychologia 51(1):59–66
pubmed: 23159344
doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.11.006
Sheridan H, Reingold EM (2013) The mechanisms and boundary conditions of the einstellung effect in chess: evidence from eye movements. PLoS ONE 8(10):e75796
pubmed: 24124515
pmcid: 3790829
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0075796
Sio U, Kotovsky K, Cagan J (2017) Interrupted: The roles of distributed effort and incubation in preventing fixation and generating problem solutions. Mem Cognit 45(4):553–565
pubmed: 28028782
doi: 10.3758/s13421-016-0684-x
Smallwood J, Schooler JW (2015) The science of mind wandering: empirically navigating the stream of consciousness. Annu Rev Psychol 66(1):487–518
pubmed: 25293689
doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-010814-015331
Summerfield C, Trittschuh EH, Monti JM, Mesulam MM, Egner T (2008) Neural repetition suppression reflects fulfilled perceptual expectations. Nat Neurosci 11:1004–1006
pubmed: 19160497
pmcid: 2747248
doi: 10.1038/nn.2163
Szpunar, Karl K (2017) Directing the wandering mind. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 26(1):40–44
doi: 10.1177/0963721416670320
Tang X, Pang J, Nie QY, Conci M, Luo J, Luo J (2015) Probing the cognitive mechanism of mental representational change during chunk decomposition: a parametric fMRI study. Cereb Cortex 26(7):2991–2999
pubmed: 26045566
doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhv113
Todorovic A, van Ede F, Maris E, de Lange FP (2011) Prior expectation mediates neural adaptation to repeated sounds in the auditory cortex: an MEG study. J Neurosci 31(25):9118–9123
pubmed: 21697363
pmcid: 6623501
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1425-11.2011
Vallée-Tourangeau F, Euden G, Hearn V (2011) Einstellung defused: interactivity and mental set. Q J Exp Psychol 64(10):1889–1895
doi: 10.1080/17470218.2011.605151
Wang Y, Xu Q, Liao S, Jia D (2017) Unfamiliar faces in recognition memory: spaced learning enhances subsequent recognition memory by reducing repetition priming. NeuroReport 28:872–878
pubmed: 28763377
doi: 10.1097/WNR.0000000000000847
Wiley J (1998) Expertise as mental set: the effects of domain knowledge in creative problem solving. Mem Cognit 26(4):716–730
pubmed: 9701964
doi: 10.3758/BF03211392
Wu L, Knoblich G, Luo J (2013) The role of chunk tightness and chunk familiarity in problem solving: evidence from ERPs and fMRI. Hum Brain Mapp 34(5):1173–1186
pubmed: 22328466
doi: 10.1002/hbm.21501
Wu X, He M, Zhou Y, Xiao J, Luo J (2017) Decomposing a chunk into its elements and reorganizing them as a new chunk: the two different subprocesses underlying insightful chunk decomposition. Front Psychol 8:2001
pubmed: 29184525
pmcid: 5694466
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02001
Xue G, Mei LL, Chen CS (2011) Spaced learning enhances subsequent recognition memory by reducing neural repetition suppression. J Cognit Neurosci 23:1624–1633
doi: 10.1162/jocn.2010.21532
Zhang Z, Yang K, Warren CM, Zhao G, Li P, Lei Y, Li H (2015) The influence of element type and crossed relation on the difficulty of chunk decomposition. Front Psychol 6:1025
pubmed: 26257683
pmcid: 4512108
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01025
Zhang Z, Luo Y, Wang C, Warren CM, Xia Q, Xing Q et al (2019) Identification and transformation difficulty in problem solving: Electrophysiological evidence from chunk decomposition. Biol Psychol 143:10–21
pubmed: 30763606
doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2019.02.004