Assessment of the psychometric properties of the Vietnamese version of the Critical Thinking Disposition Scale.


Journal

Nurse education today
ISSN: 1532-2793
Titre abrégé: Nurse Educ Today
Pays: Scotland
ID NLM: 8511379

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Aug 2023
Historique:
received: 01 03 2023
revised: 21 04 2023
accepted: 13 05 2023
medline: 12 6 2023
pubmed: 1 6 2023
entrez: 31 5 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The Critical Thinking Disposition Scale is a valid and reliable tool for assessing an individual's attitudes towards critical thinking. However, it is unclear if the scale can be used with Vietnamese nursing students. This study aimed to translate the scale into Vietnamese and examine the psychometric properties of the Vietnamese version of the Critical Thinking Disposition Scale (CTDS-V). Data were collected from senior nursing students at four universities in southern Vietnam in October and December 2022. In total, 398 senior nursing students participated in this study. A cross-cultural adaptation of the CTDS-V was carried out with participants obtained through convenience sampling. Data were collected through an online survey. The study evaluated the validity of the CTDS-V by examining the content validity, concurrent validity, and construct validity, employing both Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analyses. The study also reported the internal consistency reliability using Cronbach's alpha and test-retest stability of the CTDS-V. The CTDS-V had a good content validity index with a score of at least 0.85 for each item and an excellent overall content validity index of 0.96. Exploratory Factor Analysis identified two factors, critical openness, and reflective scepticism, with 11 items. Confirmatory Factor Analysis provided an acceptable fit model and supported the factor structure of the original scale. Cronbach's alpha coefficient of the scale was 0.88, and those of the two subscales were each 0.84. The test-retest stability of the CTDS-V was good with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.98 (95 % confidence interval = 0.96, 0.99). This study indicated that the CTDS-V is a valid and reliable tool for assessing the critical thinking disposition of nursing students. The scale is short, rendering it feasible for regular use in education and research.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
The Critical Thinking Disposition Scale is a valid and reliable tool for assessing an individual's attitudes towards critical thinking. However, it is unclear if the scale can be used with Vietnamese nursing students.
OBJECTIVES OBJECTIVE
This study aimed to translate the scale into Vietnamese and examine the psychometric properties of the Vietnamese version of the Critical Thinking Disposition Scale (CTDS-V).
SETTINGS METHODS
Data were collected from senior nursing students at four universities in southern Vietnam in October and December 2022.
PARTICIPANTS METHODS
In total, 398 senior nursing students participated in this study.
METHODS METHODS
A cross-cultural adaptation of the CTDS-V was carried out with participants obtained through convenience sampling. Data were collected through an online survey. The study evaluated the validity of the CTDS-V by examining the content validity, concurrent validity, and construct validity, employing both Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analyses. The study also reported the internal consistency reliability using Cronbach's alpha and test-retest stability of the CTDS-V.
RESULTS RESULTS
The CTDS-V had a good content validity index with a score of at least 0.85 for each item and an excellent overall content validity index of 0.96. Exploratory Factor Analysis identified two factors, critical openness, and reflective scepticism, with 11 items. Confirmatory Factor Analysis provided an acceptable fit model and supported the factor structure of the original scale. Cronbach's alpha coefficient of the scale was 0.88, and those of the two subscales were each 0.84. The test-retest stability of the CTDS-V was good with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.98 (95 % confidence interval = 0.96, 0.99).
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
This study indicated that the CTDS-V is a valid and reliable tool for assessing the critical thinking disposition of nursing students. The scale is short, rendering it feasible for regular use in education and research.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37257290
pii: S0260-6917(23)00142-9
doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2023.105848
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

105848

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

Auteurs

Trung V Nguyen (TV)

School of Nursing, College of Nursing, Taipei Medical University, Taipei City, Taiwan; Nursing Department, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Tra Vinh University, Tra Vinh City, Vietnam. Electronic address: trungnguyen@tvu.edu.vn.

Chien-Lin Kuo (CL)

Department of Allied Health Education & Digital Learning, National Taipei University of Nursing and Health Sciences, Taipei City, Taiwan. Electronic address: chienlin@ntunhs.edu.tw.

Chih-Yu Wang (CY)

School of Nursing, College of Nursing, Taipei Medical University, Taipei City, Taiwan. Electronic address: yuyuwang1206@gmail.com.

Ngoc Tuyet Le (NT)

Faculty of Nursing and Medical Technology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. Electronic address: lntuyet@ump.edu.vn.

Mai Trinh T Nguyen (MTT)

Faculty of Nursing and Medical Technology, Can Tho University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Can Tho City, Vietnam. Electronic address: nguyenthimaitrinh1101@gmail.com.

Yeu-Hui Chuang (YH)

School of Nursing, College of Nursing, Taipei Medical University, Taipei City, Taiwan; Department of Nursing, Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei City, Taiwan; Research Center in Nursing Clinical Practice, Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei City, Taiwan. Electronic address: yeuhui@tmu.edu.tw.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH