Outcomes in patients discharged with extended venous thromboembolism prophylaxis after hospitalization with COVID-19.


Journal

Vascular medicine (London, England)
ISSN: 1477-0377
Titre abrégé: Vasc Med
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9610930

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
08 2023
Historique:
medline: 9 8 2023
pubmed: 1 6 2023
entrez: 1 6 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a known complication of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) in patients requiring hospitalization and intensive care. We examined the association between extended pharmacological VTE prophylaxis and outcomes among patients hospitalized with COVID-19. This was a retrospective cohort study of patients with an index positive SARS-CoV-2 polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test at the time of, or during hospitalization. Patients who were prescribed extended pharmacological VTE prophylaxis were compared against patients who were not. Multivariable logistic regression was used to produce odds ratio (OR) estimates and Cox proportional hazard models for hazard ratios (HR) with 95% CI to examine the association between pharmacological VTE prophylaxis and outcomes of interest. Primary outcomes were 30- and 90-day VTE events. Secondary outcomes included 30- and 90-day mortality, 30-day superficial venous thrombosis (SVT), acute myocardial infarction (MI), acute ischemic stroke, critical limb ischemia, clinically significant bleeding, and inpatient readmissions. A total of 1936 patients were included in the study. Among them, 731 (38%) were discharged on extended pharmacological VTE prophylaxis. No significant difference was found in 30- and 90-day VTE events among groups. Patients discharged on extended VTE prophylaxis showed improved survival at 30 (HR: 0.35; 95% CI: 0.21-0.59) and 90 days (HR: 0.36; 95% CI: 0.23-0.55) and reduced inpatient readmission at 30 days (OR: 0.12; 95% CI: 0.04-0.33) when compared to those without. Patients discharged on extended VTE prophylaxis after hospitalization due to COVID-19 had similar thrombotic events on follow-up. However, use of extended VTE prophylaxis was associated with improved 30- and 90-day survival and reduced risk of 30-day inpatient readmission.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a known complication of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) in patients requiring hospitalization and intensive care. We examined the association between extended pharmacological VTE prophylaxis and outcomes among patients hospitalized with COVID-19.
METHODS
This was a retrospective cohort study of patients with an index positive SARS-CoV-2 polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test at the time of, or during hospitalization. Patients who were prescribed extended pharmacological VTE prophylaxis were compared against patients who were not. Multivariable logistic regression was used to produce odds ratio (OR) estimates and Cox proportional hazard models for hazard ratios (HR) with 95% CI to examine the association between pharmacological VTE prophylaxis and outcomes of interest. Primary outcomes were 30- and 90-day VTE events. Secondary outcomes included 30- and 90-day mortality, 30-day superficial venous thrombosis (SVT), acute myocardial infarction (MI), acute ischemic stroke, critical limb ischemia, clinically significant bleeding, and inpatient readmissions.
RESULTS
A total of 1936 patients were included in the study. Among them, 731 (38%) were discharged on extended pharmacological VTE prophylaxis. No significant difference was found in 30- and 90-day VTE events among groups. Patients discharged on extended VTE prophylaxis showed improved survival at 30 (HR: 0.35; 95% CI: 0.21-0.59) and 90 days (HR: 0.36; 95% CI: 0.23-0.55) and reduced inpatient readmission at 30 days (OR: 0.12; 95% CI: 0.04-0.33) when compared to those without.
CONCLUSION
Patients discharged on extended VTE prophylaxis after hospitalization due to COVID-19 had similar thrombotic events on follow-up. However, use of extended VTE prophylaxis was associated with improved 30- and 90-day survival and reduced risk of 30-day inpatient readmission.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37259526
doi: 10.1177/1358863X231159945
pmc: PMC10235916
doi:

Substances chimiques

Anticoagulants 0

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

331-339

Auteurs

Love Patel (L)

Department of Internal Medicine, Abbott Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, MN, USA.

Ashley Stenzel (A)

Care Delivery Research, Allina Health, Minneapolis, MN, USA.

Christopher Van Hove (C)

Graduate Medical Education, Abbott Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, MN, USA.

Abbey Sidebottom (A)

Care Delivery Research, Allina Health, Minneapolis, MN, USA.

Rajesh Kethireddy (R)

Department of Internal Medicine, Abbott Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, MN, USA.

Ngoc Ha (N)

Care Delivery Research, Allina Health, Minneapolis, MN, USA.

David Beddow (D)

Department of Internal Medicine, Mercy Hospital, Coon Rapids, MN, USA.

Jesse Manunga (J)

Department of Vascular Surgery, Allina Health Minneapolis Heart Institute, Minneapolis, MN, USA.

Ghaziuddin Qadri (G)

Department of Internal Medicine, Abbott Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, MN, USA.

Justin Kirven (J)

Department of Internal Medicine, Abbott Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, MN, USA.

Nedaa Skeik (N)

Department of Vascular Medicine, Allina Health Minneapolis Heart Institute, Minneapolis, MN, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH