Assessment of Chemical Facility Ethylene Oxide Emissions Using Mobile and Multipoint Monitoring.

Ethylene Oxide Fenceline Monitoring Fugitive Emissions Next Generation Emission Measurements

Journal

Atmospheric Environment: X
ISSN: 2590-1621
Titre abrégé: Atmos Environ X
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101754900

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Apr 2023
Historique:
pmc-release: 01 04 2024
medline: 1 6 2023
pubmed: 1 6 2023
entrez: 1 6 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Ethylene oxide (EtO) is a hazardous air pollutant that can be emitted from a variety of difficult to measure industrial sources, such as fugitive leaks, wastewater handling, and episodic releases. Emerging next generation emission measurement (NGEM) approaches capable of time-resolved, low parts per billion by volume (ppbv) method detection limits (MDLs) can help facilities understand and reduce EtO and other air pollutant emissions from these sources yielding a range of environmental and public health benefits. In October 2021, a first of its kind 4-day observational study was conducted at an EtO chemical facility in the midwestern United States. The study had dual objectives to both improve understanding of EtO emission sources within the facility and advance NGEM methods. Using cavity ring-down spectroscopy (CRDS) instruments, a combination of mobile surveys and stationary multipoint process unit monitoring assessed EtO concentrations in and near facility operations, while testing and comparing measurement methods. The study concluded that four main areas of EtO source emissions existed within the facility, each possessing unique emission characteristics. Episodic EtO emissions from supply railcar switchovers and batch reactor washouts, lasting seconds to minutes in duration, produced EtO concentrations exceeding 500 ppbv inside the process unit in some cases. In one instance, EtO at ~30 ppbv was briefly observed hundreds of meters from the process unit. Lower level but more sustained EtO concentrations were observed near an EtO transfer pump and wastewater tank outfall and drain system. Overall, 4.6% of mobile survey data were above the 1.2 ppbv mobile test MDL while the nine stationary sampling locations ranged from 17.7% to 82.8% of data above the 1.0 ppbv multipoint test MDL. This paper describes the EtO emissions observed in and near the four defined source areas within the facility and provides details of the NGEM method development advances accomplished as part of the study.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37260630
doi: 10.1016/j.aeaoa.2023.100214
pmc: PMC10228146
mid: NIHMS1891856
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

1-11

Subventions

Organisme : Intramural EPA
ID : EPA999999
Pays : United States

Références

Dose Response. 2019 Dec 11;17(4):1559325819888317
pubmed: 31853235
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 May 16;16(10):
pubmed: 31100939
Environ Sci Technol. 2013 Oct 15;47(20):11369-77
pubmed: 23980922
Environ Sci Technol. 2020 Nov 3;54(21):13926-13934
pubmed: 33058723
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Dec 19;17(1):
pubmed: 31861610
Toxicol Mech Methods. 2018 Jun;28(5):386-396
pubmed: 29210319
J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2020 Dec;70(12):1324-1339
pubmed: 32915694
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jan 12;18(2):
pubmed: 33445726
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jun 08;16(11):
pubmed: 31181783
Analyst. 2010 May;135(5):994-1003
pubmed: 20419248
Curr Environ Health Rep. 2020 Mar;7(1):48-57
pubmed: 31970715
J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 2021 Jan 2;24(1):1-29
pubmed: 33323046
Environ Sci Technol. 2014 Dec 16;48(24):14508-15
pubmed: 25375308

Auteurs

Eben D Thoma (ED)

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Center for Environmental Measurement and Modeling, 109 TW Alexander Dr., RTP, NC 27711, USA.

Ali Gitipour (A)

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Center for Environmental Measurement and Modeling, 109 TW Alexander Dr., RTP, NC 27711, USA.

Ingrid George (I)

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Center for Environmental Measurement and Modeling, 109 TW Alexander Dr., RTP, NC 27711, USA.

Peter Kariher (P)

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Center for Environmental Measurement and Modeling, 109 TW Alexander Dr., RTP, NC 27711, USA.

Megan MacDonald (M)

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Center for Environmental Measurement and Modeling, 109 TW Alexander Dr., RTP, NC 27711, USA.

Gustavo Queiroz (G)

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 7, U.S. EPA Region 7, 11201 Renner Blvd. Lenexa, KS 66219, USA.

Parikshit Deshmukh (P)

Jacobs Technology Inc., 109 TW Alexander Dr., RTP, NC 27711, USA.

Josh Childers (J)

CleanAir Engineering Inc., 110 Technology Drive, Pittsburgh, PA 15275, USA.

Tim Rodak (T)

CleanAir Engineering Inc., 110 Technology Drive, Pittsburgh, PA 15275, USA.

Volker Schmid (V)

CleanAir Engineering Inc., 110 Technology Drive, Pittsburgh, PA 15275, USA.

Classifications MeSH