The Cost-Effectiveness of a Novel Online Social Therapy to Maintain Treatment Effects From First-Episode Psychosis Services: Results From the Horyzons Randomized Controlled Trial.

economic evaluation online intervention psychosis quality of life social functioning youth

Journal

Schizophrenia bulletin
ISSN: 1745-1701
Titre abrégé: Schizophr Bull
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0236760

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 Jun 2023
Historique:
medline: 1 6 2023
pubmed: 1 6 2023
entrez: 1 6 2023
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Digital interventions have potential applications in promoting long-term recovery and improving outcomes in first-episode psychosis (FEP). This study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of Horyzons, a novel online social therapy to support young people aged 16-27 years following discharge from FEP services, compared with treatment as usual (TAU) from a healthcare sector and a societal perspective. A cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA), based on the change in social functioning, and a cost-utility analysis (CUA) using quality-adjusted life years were undertaken alongside a randomized controlled trial. Intervention costs were determined from study records; resources used by patients were collected from a resource-use questionnaire and administrative data. Mean costs and outcomes were compared at 18 months and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were calculated. Uncertainty analysis using bootstrapping and sensitivity analyses was conducted. The sample included 170 participants: Horyzons intervention group (n = 86) and TAU (n = 84). Total costs were significantly lower in the Horyzons group compared with TAU from both the healthcare sector (-AU$4789.59; P < .001) and the societal perspective (-AU$5131.14; P < .001). In the CEA, Horyzons was dominant, meaning it was less costly and resulted in better social functioning. In the CUA, the Horyzons intervention resulted in fewer costs but also yielded fewer QALYs. However, group differences in outcomes were not statistically significant. When young people engaged more with the platform, costs were shown to decrease and outcomes improved. The Horyzons intervention offers a cost-effective approach for improving social functioning in young people with FEP after discharge from early intervention services.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Digital interventions have potential applications in promoting long-term recovery and improving outcomes in first-episode psychosis (FEP). This study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of Horyzons, a novel online social therapy to support young people aged 16-27 years following discharge from FEP services, compared with treatment as usual (TAU) from a healthcare sector and a societal perspective.
STUDY DESIGN METHODS
A cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA), based on the change in social functioning, and a cost-utility analysis (CUA) using quality-adjusted life years were undertaken alongside a randomized controlled trial. Intervention costs were determined from study records; resources used by patients were collected from a resource-use questionnaire and administrative data. Mean costs and outcomes were compared at 18 months and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were calculated. Uncertainty analysis using bootstrapping and sensitivity analyses was conducted.
STUDY RESULTS RESULTS
The sample included 170 participants: Horyzons intervention group (n = 86) and TAU (n = 84). Total costs were significantly lower in the Horyzons group compared with TAU from both the healthcare sector (-AU$4789.59; P < .001) and the societal perspective (-AU$5131.14; P < .001). In the CEA, Horyzons was dominant, meaning it was less costly and resulted in better social functioning. In the CUA, the Horyzons intervention resulted in fewer costs but also yielded fewer QALYs. However, group differences in outcomes were not statistically significant. When young people engaged more with the platform, costs were shown to decrease and outcomes improved.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
The Horyzons intervention offers a cost-effective approach for improving social functioning in young people with FEP after discharge from early intervention services.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37261464
pii: 7188050
doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbad071
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Subventions

Organisme : Mental Illness Research Fund
Organisme : Australian National Health and Medical Research Council
Organisme : Telstra Foundation

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Maryland Psychiatric Research Center.

Auteurs

Lidia Engel (L)

School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

Mario Alvarez-Jimenez (M)

Orygen, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

Daniela Cagliarini (D)

Orygen, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

Simon D'Alfonso (S)

School of Computing and Information Systems, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

Jan Faller (J)

School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

Lee Valentine (L)

Orygen, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

Peter Koval (P)

Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

Sarah Bendall (S)

Orygen, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

Shaunagh O'Sullivan (S)

Orygen, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

Simon Rice (S)

Orygen, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

Chris Miles (C)

Orygen, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

David L Penn (DL)

Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.
Healthy Brain and Mind Research Centre and School of Behavioural and Health Sciences, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

Jess Phillips (J)

Orygen, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

Penni Russon (P)

School of Communication, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NWS, Australia.

Reeva Lederman (R)

School of Computing and Information Systems, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

Eoin Killackey (E)

Orygen, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

Shalini Lal (S)

School of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Health Innovation and Evaluation Hub, University of Montreal Hospital Research Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Douglas Mental Health University Institute, Montreal, QC, Canada.

Sue Maree Cotton (S)

Orygen, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

Cesar Gonzalez-Blanch (C)

Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
University Hospital Marques de Valdecilla-IDIVAL, Santander, Spain.

Helen Herrman (H)

Orygen, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

Patrick D McGorry (PD)

Orygen, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

John F M Gleeson (JFM)

Healthy Brain and Mind Research Centre and School of Behavioural and Health Sciences, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

Cathrine Mihalopoulos (C)

School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Deakin Health Economics, Deakin University, Burwood, VIC, Australia.

Classifications MeSH